 |
|  |
 |
|
Aramis
|
|
Not where I was tomorrow, nor will be yesterday.
Dec 2002 time: 23:31
|
|
With the impending release of C3C, and my ardent anticipation, I've been thinking about the wonder and fascination of my 1st game, and hoping I'll get that same feeling back. Since we have a few weeks let's talk about that first experience. I'd really like to know what the game was like for you.
For myself, I had never played earlier versions and was somewhat daunted by the manual. I tried to read it, but I wanted hands-on experience ('impatience" I belive that's called), so I jumped right in, on Monarch level, having no idea what to expect. I played as the Aztecs, for no reason beyond they seemed somewhat cool, and promptly treated the game like the board game 'Risk.' I had zero idea what to do with the workers beyond building roads, had no idea how to manage the economy, and attacked everyone I met. Diplomacy (novice that I was) was not an issue. I was trounced very fast, but had a blast the whole time. I remember thinking that I'd never get the hang of the game, but I kept at it and I'm glad I did.
The game fascinates me. Tell something about your first experiences w/CivIII. What did you expect? What went right or wrong? Why did you stick with it?
We've got some time to kill before C3C.
--Rob
|
|
|  |
 |
|
PrinceBimz
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rob_S
With the impending release of C3C, and my ardent anticipation, I've been thinking about the wonder and fascination of my 1st game, and hoping I'll get that same feeling back. Since we have a few weeks let's talk about that first experience. I'd really like to know what the game was like for you.
For myself, I had never played earlier versions and was somewhat daunted by the manual. I tried to read it, but I wanted hands-on experience ('impatience" I belive that's called), so I jumped right in, on Monarch level, having no idea what to expect. I played as the Aztecs, for no reason beyond they seemed somewhat cool, and promptly treated the game like the board game 'Risk.' I had zero idea what to do with the workers beyond building roads, had no idea how to manage the economy, and attacked everyone I met. Diplomacy (novice that I was) was not an issue. I was trounced very fast, but had a blast the whole time. I remember thinking that I'd never get the hang of the game, but I kept at it and I'm glad I did.
The game fascinates me. Tell something about your first experiences w/CivIII. What did you expect? What went right or wrong? Why did you stick with it?
We've got some time to kill before C3C.
--Rob |
Well I first discovered civilization on the SNES. This was before I even had a computer. When I played it, that was my favorite game, me and a friend of mind were seriously hooked! It was downright addicting! Not long after I noticed Civ2 for the PC. As you guess, not long after I got a PC. Civ2 was the first game I purchased for my new PC, the very first game out of nearly 100 that would come afterwards. I had so much fun with it. Several years later, when SMAC and the CtP series came around, I had even more fun with those. Now when Civ3 was released in the last quarter of 2001 and I got that one, WOW, this was the best. Let me tell you my favorite hands down.
So my first game of Civ3, don't remember all of the details but man was it fun. I was loving (and still do) the graphics and all of the awesome animations. The resources and luxuries, trading, diplomacy, nearly all of it was improved. Now this was a sequel! Look here it is almost exactly 2 years later and to no surprise it is still as fun or even more fun as it was when I first played it. Probably more fun now that I know how to play better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
In my first game I was stuck on a large peninsula with nothing but Plains and Forests (with Plains underneath, of course!), but no access to fresh water. It's a good thing I was awestruck by the game, because that's the kind of starting location that would make most players quit in disgust.
After flipping through the Civilopedia for about half and hour, I figured out I would have to wait until Electricity to make my cities productive. Yeah right! Quit, restart.
I played the Persians, mainly because 'Immortal' sounded cool (and still does, although somewhat misleading).
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
PeaSoup
|
|
Vancouver, BC
Nov 2001 time: 21:31
|
|
heh, I remember keeping a copy of the PDF manual on my computer so I can read it at school..
ya, my first game was India, monarch, standard map.. I think I won via a diplomatic victory.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
eris
|
|
I had played CTP for a while, as a somewhat mild addiction. I tried Civ2, but it seemed like a step backward, primarily because of the lack of stack moves. I moved on to other thngs for a while. The loved ones bought me a copy of PTW for Winter Solstice. I had to avoid explaining that it wasn't a whole package and tactfully went to the store to buy Civ3 so I could use the PTW gift.
I read the manual. I often read manuals, and it often helps, too. I browsed the Civilopedia while trying a couple of practice runs. I decided I was ready for a game. I played Cleopatra on Chieftan. Knowing what I know now, I made terrible mistakes. I let the workers automate, etc. However, I had a good starting position and a bit of stubborness and had picked a huge map so I had room to work in. I found out I was a builder. Every city had everything in it I could build. Every city had troops in it. Diplomacy and Trade seemed like a great game concept, but all the deals offered seemed like highway robbery, and nobody liked me. (That hurt! I had been playing nice!) Then someone got uppity and declared war. I had a good time using my over-developed military to trounce them. I found out that taking over cities made for a bigger empire. This was fun! Let's go take out some other little Civ! I stumbled through the tech tree, having some idea of what it was all about and what I would want. I did find the science slider and kept it pushed up, so I did keep a big tech lead. Then, when I was busily crushing some poor helpless Civ who had mistakenly declared war, I suddenly got a culture win. (I had been building every possible thing in my cities, remember?) I was kinda disappointed at first. Then I liked that I had done a "peaceful" win (not counting the three Civs I had eliminated).
I liked the graphics, and the epic story feel. I missed Wonder movies as eye candy because I had enjoyed them in CTP. I was glad I started at the easiest level, but I knew those Civs were smarter than the ones I was used to. I knew that I would have fun working with them as things got up in levels. The complexities looked easy enough to work with (I had just won!) and complex enough to offer a variety of opportunites.
I was hooked.
I'm glad I jumped in at PTW. I have played a bit with vanilla Civ3, and much prefer PTW, especially because of the stacked unit movements. Also, I think the earlier versions were buggy enough to affect gameplaying enjoyment. I'm glad I missed that.
I became a builder, going for Spaace and Diplo and Cilture winds in different ways. Then I found these forums. Then I became a more aggresive builder. Sometimes, much more aggresive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
First game was Caesar on Regent level. Legions just sounded so cool so I had to try them. I've played CivII enough to beat diety easily and I have to say, it handicapped my playing. I tried the typical CivII strategy of booting everyone off my continent early although I waited until I got Legions. "Golden Age"? What's that? I'll just ignore it...
Boy was I surprised to see my Legions lose against Spearmen, not just in a rare event but pretty regularily. Also shocked at that first stack of 4 AI Swordsman taking my Spearman guarded city. Hey, wait! I had city walls! What's that? Only a 50% bonus now? Oh.
Built the FP in a city right next to the capital (dumb dumb dumb!). Tried sending Settlers in Triremes over the ocean. Lost 'em all.
Ordered my very strong neighbor out of my territory instead of meekly allowing the intrusion. War declared. My empire wiped out. Game over.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
G'Kar
|
|
St. Louis, USA
Aug 2003 time: 23:31
|
|
It was chieftain and I got crushed; the AIs are much more aggressive (and better programmed) than in other 4X games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The_Aussie_Lurker
|
|
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
May 2001 time: 05:31
|
|
Hi, All I can remember about MY first game was that I tried to play using my old Civ2 tactics-and got soundly THRASHED !!! It wasn't that I lost, more that I was sooo far behind everyone else, and stuck in a horrible losing war!!! I slowly started to adapt my play style, and was doing much better when CRASH-one day my computer died, and I haven't been able to play Civ3 since ! I have an older computer, though, and I was playing Civ2 ToT a lot, but it just wasn't the same !!! In particular, I keep expecting to see my borders and get strategic resources ! I will have a new computer in the new year, however, and plan to get C3:C as soon as that happens!!!
Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
p.s.: Even in it's earliest stages, I was VERY impressed with the new AI, as compared to that of civ2 (another disappointing step backwards for me, as I keep overvaluing the AI's 'intelligence in ToT!!) If what I've heard about the AI improvements is anything to go by, I think I'll be even more amazed when I start the game anew!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solomwi

|
 |
Don King of the Apolyton HLA Movement
Dec 2002 time: 23:31
|
|
I'm pretty sure this was my first game, but I played Russia on Warlord, choosing them based on traits alone after skimming through what was new in the manual.
"Expansionists get a unit NOBODY else gets?!? COOL!"
"Scientifics get FREE TECH?!? Somebody pinch me! No way there's a better civ combination than these!"
The rest of the game went as could be expected. I kept using my Civ 2 tactics, and getting frustrated when they wouldn't work, but still in awe of the improvements over Civ 2. I remember just south of Moscow was a large desert, and on the southern end of that attached the bulk of my continent, with a large jungle separating me from Lizzy. I put my FP just two cities south of Moscow, with no intention of ever moving the palace, and sent a lone settler deep into the jungle to claim a patch of Dyes. Not long after that, I saw an orange SOD (swords and longbows, mainly), and no matter how many Riflemen I rushed, couldn't seem to find the end of her forces that were hell-bent on taking that city. I had a worker already building a road to it and tried to rush Cossack reinforcements. IIRC, though, I was rushing one at a time out there, so that was a LOT of help. I don't think I played much past that point, as I just HAD to keep that Dye city. I wish I had kept a save of that game.
I just fired up old school Civ 3 and loaded one of the few saves I have left, one of the first games I won (I think), on Warlord, with Babylon. I own over half the world on a huge map and have eliminated the Iroquois, Americans and Zulu. I also obviously had no cxlue what I was doing. Though I own all of my home landmass, I've still got considerable garrisons in most of the cities there. I've built no marines, one paratrooper, two helicopters, 18 artillery units and nearly 200 each of MI and MA. I scanned the map, and was aghast at my neophyte brute force tactics and abysmal force concentration, no style whatsoever. Also, it's 1964 and I only have 6 luxuries (with a 7th just one battle away)! Probably the most jaw-dropping aspect to me was having only three cities producing over 100 shields, even with manufacturing plants, and only one of those producing over 105 (Persepolis at 141). Then I looked at my core and saw why. Babylon is size 41 and growing. Ugh.
Actually, checking the HoF, I think my first win was with America on Chieftain, and it was Diplomatic with a whopping score of 936. I don't remember anything about the game, though.
Lord, this is like looking back at all my goofy middle school yearbook pictures. Thankfully, I've shed the Civ 2 mindset, learned many finer points of the game, and developed a sense of style to my empires and war plans. Probably 90% of the credit for that goes to 'Poly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aramis
|
|
Not where I was tomorrow, nor will be yesterday.
Dec 2002 time: 23:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Solomwi
Lord, this is like looking back at all my goofy middle school yearbook pictures. Thankfully, I've shed the Civ 2 mindset, learned many finer points of the game, and developed a sense of style to my empires and war plans. Probably 90% of the credit for that goes to 'Poly. |
I give 'Poly a lot of the credit, too. Early games were mostly disasters (tho' fun) even AFTER I read the manual. Winning strategies developed soon after and were fine-tuned by what I read in different threads.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:31
|
|
It was a lowly Chieftain game, playing as America on a huge Pangaea map. I was completely hemmed in by both the Aztecs and Iroquois (attributed to building up improvements and wonders at the expense of settlers, and my being located on a peninsula in the south-west corner of the map).
I might have continued, and gladly made a stab at wiping the Aztecs out had my computer back then not been a lowly PII 350mHz PC with 64MB RAM and unable to manage huge maps.
Most games after that, I kept winning Cultural victories playing as all the Industrious civs (since back then I was addicted to the Industrious trait and had difficulty managing without it).
Upon moving up to Regent, the real fun of this game began.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
ugly
very ugly
My egyptians got roasted on monarch.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nuther
|
|
The first game I can remember was a standard continent monarch game, I was france. I had spain and scandinavia on my continent. I took half of spain and stopped. Then culture flipping took away some of their cities. Scandinavia was number one so I built cavalry, muskets and cannon and invaded before they got way too big. But, I didnt know how to fight and I lost the war becuase they had riflemen. Then I gave up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|