 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I guess what I would suggest is that the US start using air bases in the desert, away from population centers so that they can maintain a defensive perimeter wide enough to allow the aircraft time to climb above the range of these missles.
Arming the Shiites looks better all the time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BKWM
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I guess what I would suggest is that the US start using air bases in the desert, away from population centers so that they can maintain a defensive perimeter wide enough to allow the aircraft time to climb above the range of these missles. |
Why don't we use an aircraft-carrier in the ocean.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BKWM
|
|
Where were they taking them?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO
The parralells to Vietnam are easy to say, but the situation is totally different. In Vietnam you were facing a much larger resistence that was augmented by a national army applying pressure in the north. This was coupled with large support of arms and training by USSR. That is not the case in Iraq.
Polls show that the vast majority of the Iraqi people support the American presence. Many of the insurgents are foriegn nationals and not indeginous population. Strong political control is being excersized by the US. The troops enjoy strong support from the American people. There are no areas that attacks are coming from that the troops are being barred from.
Any invasion of a country will meet resistence. That does not make it a parralell to Vietnam. |
1) The situation is totally different, yet eerily similar. Vietnam was supplied by China mostly. But they (VC) didn't believe they were gonna live forever with allah and 17 virgins either. They (VC) didn't cherish martyrdom, plus, the people making their way to Iraq are the mujahadeen who fought the Russians in Afghanistan. It is almost as if OBL is hunting America as his next big game. Right now, the generals of this war are being created in the streets of Fallujah and Tikrit. Every time they have a success, they learn a great deal, and, they gain a little more momentum.
2) How can you believe a poll taken in a country asking peopel how they feel about the force in town that takes people away at night for being Baathist sympathizers. These are Iraqis we are talking about, not Americans. I bet if there is one thing every Iraqi knows is, "say nice things about the guy in power" Polls in Iraq mean nothing.
3) Just because resistance is being led by foreign nationals, how does that make it any easier? Because they speak a different language. As a poor muslim Iraqi, who would you help, the white Christian guy who brought the war to your country, or the "freedom fighter" who faces the east and prays with you ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BKWM
|
|
Probably the freedom-fighter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BKWM
|
|
What's that got to do with anything?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:31
|
|
How many non-Iraqi terrorists have been arrested in Iraq yet?
I ask this, since I have the feeling that this talk of the resistance being led by foreigners and/or al Qaeda is more a guess, or wishfull thinking, than fact.
I'm truely curious. Does anybody have anything solid on these foreigners?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeOmega
Yes, some Syrian Nationals were caught or killed.... I believe a Yemenese/Yemenite/Yemeni.... but in all truth, you may be right. Regardless, it is only the next logical step, right? |
I don't see why it would be a 'logical' step.
For one, if the iraqi's themselves are making life difficult for the American troops, there is not much need to go there as an al Qaeda operative, you could focus on goals elsewhere.
From the US perpective, if foreigners are the ones causing the troubles in Iraq, it means they are doing a good job, since then the Iraqi's are appeased. In Vietnam and Korea (in the 50's) it has also been romoured Soviets and Chinese 'foreigners' were the ones responsible for the stiff resistance. In both those cases it is clear the nationals themselves were largely responsible for the US losses.
I'm afraid (for the US) that it is the Iraqi's themselves are the ones fighting them, and that foriegners play an insignificant part in it. The US would do wise to acknoledge that, since knowing who your enemy is, is the key to winning a war. Blaming it on outside influence, and thereby more or less saying it is out of their control, could well be sticking your head in the sand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:31
|
|
Yes, i admit the suicide bombers are a strange factor in the equation.
However, the bulk of the attacks (as the shooting of this chopper) do not involve suicide tactics.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|