 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
MTG do you buy the theory that if we can locate the ringleaders and either kill them or jail them, that most of this will stop? |
Not really, no. Two reasons - one is there's no indication of large scale command and control in most of the areas these guys are operating. It's an IED here, an RPG there, some opportunistic small arms fire. I think it's spreading not due to larger scales of operations or command persona, but due to the fact that every success goes through the popular grapevine, and more people are encouraged to act.
Second thing is we tend too much in this country (in the war on drugs, organized crime, and in warfighting) to concentrate a lot of resources on decapitation. In reality, organizations grow new heads, and/or learn to function without heads. But if you remove the arms and the legs and the viscera, the head can't do much on it's own, whether you find it or not.
That's why I think we need to up the manpower, but not tie the newly arrived units (all light infantry/airborne) to physical occupation zones. I think we also need to free up 101 ABD and replace it with another heavy division, attach 25 LID (Tropical Lightning) to XVIII Airborne Corps, and bring 82 ABD from brigade to divisional strength, and give XVIII Airborne Corps the operational responsibility to move into one hot city or sector at a time, and shut the **** down. 30-40,000 new troops spread out is an increase in overall density of only 20-25%. 30-40,000 new light and airmobile troops concentrated in a trouble spot for 2-3 weeks at a time, then moved elsewhere as needed) is an increase in density of hundreds of times in those trouble spots. Fallujah has been a pain in the ass from the get go, so we need to start there.
Bush will never do it though, because increasing the force in country and going to a large, concentrated reaction force would be an admission that the present plans and policy aren't working.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
This is why I've been saying for a while we need to put in two more divisions into the Sunni triangle, and take it apart one city and one area at a time. When we concentrated an entire brigade in Fallujah, the *******s quited down. Let's see what they do with two full divisions taking the town apart, uncovering these weapons caches, stripping them bare of unauthorized weapons, and arresting and removing every ******* we find.
Then secure the town, and move on to the next one. |
I agree completely, and Fallujah has to become the example. If we don't have the guts to do it, we need to arm and mobilize a force of Shiites to set up shop there and remind the locals of how Saddam ran things. They might see the value of the rule of law once they themselves have been outlawed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
I assume if MtG were emperor, we still be in Vietnam searching for the enemy tunnels and never doing anything decisive to win the war. If the population supports the resistance, it can go on indefinitely.
|
The trolling is getting a bit old, Ned and my brother died as a result of Agent Orange, so you can **** off now with the what I would have done in 'Nam commentary. If I'd been emperor, I never would have gotten involved in the war, from 1946 on, and certainly wouldn't have felt the need to kiss French shlong wrt their former empire and national ego to get them to go along with NATO and oppose the Russkies. So, you heard right, we never would have been there.
All you're doing is sugarcoating the fiasco of "Vietnamization" as excuse to say, "Gee, we invaded, but you haven't welcomed us with open arms and we can't hack it, so we're looking for an excuse to get the hell out while still being able to rationalize to ourselves we won even if we can't convince anyone else." Sorry, but your Commander in Chief said things would be a bit different. We don't have the option of watching our proxies lose two years after we pull out.
Your buddy Bush of the noble and glorious Republican party said the goal was to make Iraq a "model" and a "beacon of hope" for the ME. And what about all that talk about basing American troops in Iraq so we can exert leverage on Saudi, Iran, and Syria? What about all that talk?
Hard to make sure we get those contracts and get Iraq to play swing producer on oil prices if the new Iraqi government gets knocked over in a coup by former Baathists, or goes into a sectarian civil war. We're stuck with a mess, whether you like it or not.
quote:
We have to have a new Iraqi government with both the resources and the balls to do what is necessary to win.
|
And you're a good two to three years from that, depending on what you get for a representative government scheme, assassinations, and the diverging interests of different Iraqi interest groups.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|