 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"but to compare them to my inlaws at Auschwitz IS a vile trivializations"
Which is why I said "It's far from the holocaust". Did you overread that?
But your "Gitmo is a detention camp for people caught on the battlefield" is a travialization, I stand by that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Mionrs - what 17 year olds?"
I think 15 or 16 for the youngest.
"Youre comparing this to people who murdered 4 year olds."
I'm not comparing Guantanomo to Auschwitz. Read again.
"Driven to suicide - youre comparing this to being murdered?"
Depending on the circumstances, it can be murder.
"How many people commit suicide in european prisons?"
Less than in the US, I'd assume.
"yet we're told that theres a huge moral difference between the US and europe cause we have the death penalty."
I don't know what this has to do with the issue, but that's definately correct.
"These men were caught on battlefields."
Or in some medreasa. How do you know?
"Theyre illegal combatants"
As established under which procedure, by whom?
"not POWS cause they are not part of a recognized army"
Irrelevant.
"Do you really think theyre NOT members of AQ?"
I don't know. That's why I want an independent tribunal to establish that. Next time someone accuses you of something, will you be happy with the prosecutor saying "nah, i don't treally think he's innocent" to lock you up indefinately?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
"I don't know. That's why I want an independent tribunal to establish that. Next time someone accuses you of something, will you be happy with the prosecutor saying "nah, i don't treally think he's innocent" to lock you up indefinately? |
we're at war. An independent tribunal would be an opportunity for them to gain info to use in defeating interrogation, and to pass on information to the outside. We possess Al Qaeda documents showing how they attempt to counter interrogation, etc. We know they attempt to pass info in and out (er didnt you hear that there were alleged spies among the chaplains down there) Is it possible that the Bush admin is using this to arrest political dissidents, etc? er, I havent noticed any missing. Chomsky- check. Ramsey Clark - check. etc. Or maybe political types in pakistan? Doubtful. Pakis would wanna keep those. And in the cases where political islamist types have been arrested, like Abu bashir in Indonesia, hes being held and tried there, not at Gitmo. So i dont think this is being used politically no. So the risk is that they have taken innocents by mistake. Thats bad if it happens, but given the nature of the war we're fighting i can accept that risk.
To make it personal. I know a lot of folks who study at Jewish yeshivas. I know that there are yeshivas that are aligned with the terrorist Kahanist movement. If the US or Israeli govt expected an imminent threat from the kahanists, and detained someone i knew from those yeshivas without trial, and it turned out that they were innocent and just got caught up - id say thats too bad, mistakes happen, and they should have known better than to go to a yeshiva aligned with terrorists.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"The folks there have been caught in battlefields (including shootouts in pakistani cities and elsewhere)"
How do you know that? Even the names are in part not documented.
"And theyre not being mistreated"
You're dreaming.
"on of the individuals there is probably Khalid Sheik mohammed"
Probably? But you know for certain that everyone there is guilty. Please.
It's pissing in the face of habeas corpus for no good reason. It's just as useless as the British suspension of habeas corpus in NI and the arbitrary arrests of IRA suspects.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"we're at war."
Fundamental error. The war only exists as a marketing ploy. I still wait for those rules being extended to the war on drugs and the war on obesity.
"An independent tribunal would be an opportunity for them to gain info to use in defeating interrogation"
Oh the horror. It's called the right to defend yourself.
"To make it personal. I know a lot of folks who study at Jewish yeshivas. I know that there are yeshivas that are aligned with the terrorist Kahanist movement. If the US or Israeli govt expected an imminent threat from the kahanists, and detained someone i knew from those yeshivas without trial, and it turned out that they were innocent and just got caught up - id say thats too bad, mistakes happen, and they should have known better than to go to a yeshiva aligned with terrorists."
Now that's monumentally ****ed up. I don't like to bring up that analogy, but you know what Schutzhaft was? You know the arguments of Best on legal counsel, judicial review etc?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"but can you really think that is a "trivialization" such as comparing it to Auschwitz?"
Of course it's not. What is your problem? that I did not respond to techusomething? Simple, I think you have a genuine view worthy of debating it. I do not think that of techuguy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"that way, when one of their cells goes quiet, they wont have to guess who we've got."
Oh please, you really think they can't figure that out?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"My problem is that you called what i did trivialazation,"
I don't care about people who throw around the Nazi attribute generously. People like you who undermine fundamental rights by claiming wars, security needs etc and trivializing the first signs of the plague are much more dangerous.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
techumseh
|
 |
of the frozen North.
Apr 1999 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
this is a repeated trope from the far left - ashcroft is Heydrich.
Mr, tecumseh, my great grandfather was murdered by the Nazis. My parents in law were in Auschwitz. 3 of my wifes 4 grandparents were murdered by the Nazis.
I can assure you, that all rather have dealt with the ashcroft Justice dept.
Gitmo is a detention camp for people caught on the battlefield. No children. No women, afaik. No one is killed there. No one has to back breaking labor. No prisoner has to do ANY labor, AFAIK. Harsh interrogation techniques perhaps, but then these are people who have been involved in terrorist orgs and have actually turned over terrorist plans under interrogation. These are not innocents, not vicitims of racial persecution. And their treatment, as far as i can tell, is something that my inlaws and their fellow inmates would have dreamed of receiving.
The comparison is not only wrong, it is vile, and - yes - trivializes the holocaust. |
Never claimed it was Auschwitz, or the holocaust. Said the current regime in the US had commonalities with Nazi Germany, including attacks on the civil rights of their own people. And concentration camps. Gitmo IS a concentration camp, NOT an extermination camp. BTW concentration camps were developed first by the British, during the Boer War. They were intended to isolate the Boer Kommandos from the civilian population which supported them.
Conditions at Gitmo - people held without charges, no rights, denied the status of Prisoners of War, under threat of execution by military tribunal - has produced many attempted suicides. The American government will not dissavow the use of torture there. It is noteworthy that these conditions would not be considered legal within the US proper.
BTW, how do you know that all prisoners at Gitmo are terrorists? Because the US government says so? I guess we'll never really know, will we, since there has never been formal charges or a trial.
Racial profiling is another odius practice of the Bush regime. Many people of Arabic descent have been arrested for no other reason than their national origin. One Canadian citizen who was born in Syria was arrested by American officials when his plane stopped over at JFK while returning from a Carribean vacation. He was deported to Syria, where he was imprisoned and tortured for months before the Canadian government secured his release. Many Canadians of Arab or Iranian descent will no longer travel to the US because they are afraid. It's an emotion I'm sure your relatives would understand.
quote: He is not the only one with his opinion, it is not by any means the first time i have seen it. I think it is worth debating, and thats why I CHOSE to debate it. | Thank you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Yup - mtg IS quite harsh on Rummy, Wolfie and Feith. He doesnt mention Rice and Cheney alot, perhaps because they are not directly in the way of the military people who he respects more.
|
I just lump them in with the rest.
quote:
I think MTG has a tendency which he shares with the left to lump Rummy and Wolfie together. Which i can understand, since Wolfie publicly supports Rummy and hasnt resigned or anything. (of course you could say the same for Powell vis a vis Bush, etc) My sense is that the Rummy-Cheney view is quite different from the Wolfie-Bolton neo con view, despite past shared affiliations in PNAC, etc. Wolfie I think is a more or less genuine hard line neo-wilsonian - he honestly thinks we can build a democracy in Iraq, and that we need to to win the WOT. Rummy and Cheney, I think, share the general conservative skepticm of nation-building and neo-wilsonianism in general. I have no proof, and i know that it was Wolfie, not Rummy who dressed down Shinseki in public on the number of occupation troops, but I the reluctance to use more troops seems more in line with Rummys goals (make the army lean and mean, make it more "usable") then Wolfies ("reinvent the Middle East") I suspect this leads to tension on a number of occupation related issues.
I would suggest reading an interview with Wolfie by Dave Ignatius of the WaPo. Sorry , i dont have the link handy. |
I'd lump Aspin in with the same bunch, if he were still around. I'm a results oriented sort of guy. I don't care about the labels put on the ideology, I care about the assigned mission, the means and obstacles, and the feasibility of overcoming the obstacles with the means allocated. Kind of the Pathfinder squad leader's point of view, what a coincidence. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Under the 3rd reich a person in "protective custody", apparently someone held for eugenic reasons of some kind.
|
Not quite. Anyone called an internal enemy by police or party officials could be arrested and isolated. No review, no appeal, no reasons. The justifications cooked up sound exactly like the ones for Guantanamo.
As for democracy, well, somewhat.
As for war, it's a crime problem, not a war.
As for terrorism, it is a plague. And you are infected, too.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|