 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:31
|
|
quote: I think I agree, (everybody is better off without welfare, except seriously ill and disabled people!! I don't believe helping those are part of the libertarian agenda?) |
Sure, freedom includes helping those you believe are worthy of help, just don't steal from others.
quote: I also have doubts regarding legalizing drugs. Drugs are dangerous to your body and you should seek HELP instead of the "I'm free to use my body" BS. No offence to a certain person in this thread. |
You think the state (politicians) owns your body? Would you maintain that view if the state was banning products you like to use? Calling other people's freedom "BS" and adding "no offense" is... BS, offense intended. Oh, and drugs are dangerous? No, over-indulging can be dangerous, but I see nothing inherently dangerous about drugs. Now, if you say some people can't help but over-indulge, that's true. And using them as an excuse to "punish" everyone else who doesn't over-indulge is immoral. It's called punishing the innocent because of the "guilty" and you sure wouldn't extoll the virtues of such a principle if you were punished because I committed murder...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
Anyone who believes it is right to help those less fortunate than themselves and protect them from oppression is not a libertarian. I am not a libertarian.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
You guys are barking up the wrong tree. Libertarians and Anarchists are totally different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MikeH
Ok, say I kill a poor guy a tramp/bum. For no reason, just for fun.
He's got no family, there are a few people who know him but they haven't got any money either only what they can beg/steal. So who's going to pay a small fortune for police call out fees, trial and many years of inprisonment. Or do we just have summary justice meeted out by 200AD style judges? In which case who pays for them? |
Libertarians believe in having a police force. I don't see why this case would be treated any differently in a libertarian world.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MikeH
What, they believe in making everyone pay for a police force? You'd need a government for that, and taxes! What if I want to pay for my own protection? You can't make me contribute, it's immoral! |
That's what an anarchist would say. Libertarians still believe in government, just limited government. Basically the government should be limited to a police force, a military, and a justice system.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MikeH
And obviously you need to add tax collection (general treasury) to that as well and some kind of electoral system, so that the people can choose who spends their money on defence and justice.
How do you deal with other governments? You might believe in free trade etc but they probably won't, also wars are expensive so best to avoid those as much as possible. That'll require some kind of diplomatic section to the government.
You're going to need some way for people to find out what the government are doing as well. That'd be some kind of press corps. |
I think you still have the wrong idea about how things work under a libertarian government. Perhaps 'libertarian' means something different in europe. Have a look at the American libertarian website if you're curious.
I can't say I agree with everything the libertarians propose, but mostly I do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
Part of the problem is how you define 'hurting someone'. Things like murder and assault are fine, but what about blackmail? Probably fine too, but is it not my right to make money from someone else's misfortune?
If I am born into a poor family who cannot afford to pay my education is that my fault? Why should I be penalised? Is my freedom not removed by other people having a better education, since I won't have such a high standard of living?
If I deny someone a job because of the colour of their skin, am I not hurting them? If you make me hire them, are you not restricting my freedom?
We all have to make compromises to live in a comunal society - but what if I don't want to compromise? What if I want to live the life of a native American and hunt wild buffalo and live in a tent? Are you not impeding my freedom by saying I cannot? Is your insistence in the existence of private property not impeding my freedom?
Almost every facet of government which exists in our society today was put there in oder (in principle) to protect someone's freedoms. While some of them may have gone over the top, are you not removing freedom by taking them away?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I think you guys need to talk to a true libertarian if you want answers to these questions. Someone like David Floyd or Berzerker.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|