 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS
NYC district denies
birth of Jesus?
Nativity scene barred as not 'historically accurate representation of an event'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 12, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
In a dispute over display of holiday symbols, New York City schools are allowing Jewish menorahs and Islamic crescents but barring Christian nativity scenes, alleging the depiction of the birth of Christ does not represent a historical event.
In pleadings with a federal court in defense of the ban, New York City lawyers asserted the "suggestion that a crèche is a historically accurate representation of an event with secular significance is wholly disingenuous."
The Jewish and Islamic symbols are allowed, the district says, because they have a secular dimension, but the Christian symbols are "purely religious."
Robert J. Muise, who will challenge the school policy at a federal court hearing tomorrow in Brooklyn, told WorldNetDaily be believes most Americans don't see it that way.
"The birth of Jesus is a historical event which serves as the basis for celebration of Christmas," Muise stated. "It's of importance for both Christians and non-Christians."
Muise's Michigan-based Thomas More Law Center filed a motion to temporarily restrain the city from enforcing its ban on nativity scenes. The center asserts New York's policy "promotes the Jewish and Islamic faiths while conveying the impermissible message of disapproval of Christianity in violation of the U.S. Constitution."
The Michigan group says one public-school principal issued a memo encouraging teachers to bring to school "religious symbols" that represent the Islamic and Jewish religions, but made no mention of Christianity.
Jewish menorahs adorned the halls of the school as part of the authorized displays, the More Center said, but students were not allowed to make and similarly display nativity scenes
A parent who wrote a letter of complaint to her son's teacher received a copy of the school's "Holiday Displays" policy in response.
Kate Ahlers, communications director for New York City's law department, says schools can use things that are secular like menorahs, stars and snowflakes, but the crèche is considered religious.
"There is a separation of church and state that is part of the Constitution," she claimed. "It's a clear belief that people try to follow in schools and public office, and schools are saying they adhere to that belief."
The point of schools, she added, "is not to debate religion; the point of schools is to teach children."
The federal civil-rights lawsuit was filed on behalf of Andrea Skoros and her two elementary-school children against the city of New York and several school officials.
Skoros and her children are devout Roman Catholics.
"Can Christianity be erased from a public school?" Muse asked in a statement. "Can 'Christ' be removed from Christmas? We will soon find out."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/a...RTICLE_ID=35544
also...
School bans saying 'christmas'
Christmas in America becomes battleground
--------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me that christians are increasingly being discriminated against. Christian traditions are derided and in some cases punished. Is this 'tolerance'?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: And how can anyone claim that the birth of Jesus Christ is not a historical event |
Christmas is a pagan observance, from the X-mas tree on down to Santa Claus and the yule log. And no serious researcher would claim Jesus was born on Dec 25, a date falling suspiciously ~3 days after the winter solstice as the sun first makes it's northward climb toward spring, the same day as a Roman observance...hmm... I mention this only because many Christians look down their noses at pagans. 
My religion involves cannabis, will they let me bring thy holy bong and sacramental bud? Well, I'm sure there are Rastafarians in NY... But their religion has been outlawed by Christians and Christians are complaining about religious persecution? But hey, if it isn't the 10 Commandments it's nativity scenes. When these zealous restorers of the true faith say the depiction of Jesus' birth is not historically accurate, aren't they saying Christianity is somewhat of a false religion? That seems to be message... It doesn't matter if the depiction is an accurate portrayal of the birth of Christ, only that some/most Christians accept it as at least a symbolic if not historical depiction . But by all means, let the city of NY inform Christians everywhere just what would constitute an accurate depiction. Strange position for city bureaucrats to be putting themselves in, they will decide if your religion is historically accurate. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: So showing favoritism to every religion other than christianity is not persecuting christians? Okayyy... |
It's showing favoritism to two religions other than Christianty, not every other religion. And yes, it isn't. Freedom of religion isn't gone. You can still be Christian. You just can't decorate a few schools a certain way.
When I was in school, I wasn't allowed to put up whatever I wanted all over the building. Did that mean my beliefs were being persecuted?
quote: Let's see, you can bring your religion... but not you guys... |
I thought you were fine with that. After all, only Congress is subject to the establishment clause, right? Wasn't that your argument wrt the religious display in front of that court?
quote: Like I said, no one is being torched on a pyre of wood, but telling people their religion is not valid enough to be displayed is a form of persecution. |
They're not losing their freedom of religion. This ain't "persecution."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
It's showing favoritism to two religions other than Christianty, not every other religion. |
Judaism and Islam pretty much covers all other major religions in the US.
quote:
And yes, it isn't. Freedom of religion isn't gone. You can still be Christian. You just can't decorate a few schools a certain way. |
Persecution is characterized by discrimination. In this case, the christians are being discriminated against.
quote:
When I was in school, I wasn't allowed to put up whatever I wanted all over the building. Did that mean my beliefs were being persecuted? |
If everyone else was allowed to, then yes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I don't see how the star of David or the crescent and star represents a historical event.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
Christmas is a pagan observance, from the X-mas tree on down to Santa Claus and the yule log. And no serious researcher would claim Jesus was born on Dec 25, a date falling suspiciously ~3 days after the winter solstice as the sun first makes it's northward climb toward spring, the same day as a Roman observance...hmm... I mention this only because many Christians look down their noses at pagans. 
My religion involves cannabis, will they let me bring thy holy bong and sacramental bud? Well, I'm sure there are Rastafarians in NY... But their religion has been outlawed by Christians and Christians are complaining about religious persecution? But hey, if it isn't the 10 Commandments it's nativity scenes. When these zealous restorers of the true faith say the depiction of Jesus' birth is not historically accurate, aren't they saying Christianity is somewhat of a false religion? That seems to be message... It doesn't matter if the depiction is an accurate portrayal of the birth of Christ, only that some/most Christians accept it as at least a symbolic if not historical depiction . But by all means, let the city of NY inform Christians everywhere just what would constitute an accurate depiction. Strange position for city bureaucrats to be putting themselves in, they will decide if your religion is historically accurate. |
Hey super genius -- I was not talking about the DATE that Jesus Christ was born. But if we Christians have chosen a date based on traditons and custom, there is no harm with that.
MY QUESTION WAS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
how can people claim that Jesus was never born at all -- it WAS an actual historic event, regardless of WHEN it happened.
And saying that "Christians are being persecuted" is sensationalizing this incident. But clearly, Christians are being pushed into the mud while the jerks leave Muslim and Jewish symbols to shine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|