 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I have to admit that I don't know what to think. I know that I don't think that it is an unforgiveable sin. I think that generally there are better choices which can be made, but understand that some people can't see them.
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
tried it, can't recommend
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:32
|
|
People can live without me, I cant live without people. Its a case of feather and birds. Besides, I'm not majorly sociable so its not like thousands of people will lay flowers outside my door and chuck lillies at my hurst!
Nonetheless, your argument makes the fallacious assumption that I do not care about the effect it would have on those who love me, whereas that is of course not the case. It is a predicament that leaves me two solutions. Reduce the number of people that love me, or die regardless. Both is good!
Last edited by Whaleboy on 24-11-2003 at 02:42
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
we can tell by your avatar icon...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:32
|
|
quote:
Yes Whaleboy, I have. Her death had the effect of making me look at my own life and realise what i was becoming. Dont assume me to be so naive that i am unable to realise the harm losing someone you love can do; not telling you about it doesnt mean I wasnt hurt.
|
I am well aware of the harm that losing someone can do, I am very well aware the harm it can do when you feel a sense of responsibility for that death. Do not assume I am making the assumption that you are naive merely because I ask you a question whose response would contribute to such a critical analysis. Connotations are notoriously hard to express and receive accurately through hastily written text, as a result, I try to rarely assume they are there, unless clearly deliberate. If that appeared the case, it was not.
Back on topic. When ones reasons for outweigh the reasons against for taking a particular action, that action becomes logical. The means for defining that is down to the individual, and it is not up to outside individuals to deride that logic and personal disposition, merely because it disagrees with their own. That is not how communication works. Instead, one must attempt to understand the logic of the beholder, and either work within that to change their views or use a two-way discourse to interact with their own (shared assumptions to expose faulty reasoning). You will have little success changing someones mind when it is made up, unless (like in most suicides I presume), the action has not been thought out. As you know, I like to think that the latter is not the case, otherwise it would fluctuate from day to day.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|