 |
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:32
|
|
Am I the only one who thinks Rumsfeld's comment makes perfect sense?
quote: LONDON, England (Reuters) -- A comment last year by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on the hunt for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was awarded the "Foot in Mouth" prize Monday by Britain's Plain English Campaign.
Rumsfeld, renowned for his uncompromising tough talking, received the prize for the most baffling comment by a public figure.
"Reports that say something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know," Rumsfeld told a news briefing.
"We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know."
John Lister, spokesman for the campaign, which strives to have public information delivered in clear, straightforward English, said: "We think we know what he means. But we don't know if we really know."
Although Rumsfeld's comments were made at a news briefing in February 2002, they were nominated for this year's award.
Rumsfeld, whose boss, President Bush, is often singled out by language critics for his sometimes unusual use of English, defeated actor-turned-politician Arnold Schwarzenegger for the booby prize.
"I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman," the new California governor said. |
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europ...reut/index.html
So, are the British really too stupid to understand what Rummy was saying? Or are they just using this award to criticize Rumsfeld and his policies? Either way, I think it is pretty clear that American English is the new world standard and the Brits should just do us all a favor (not favour), stop whining (not whinging) and conform already. Discuss...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
I'm disappointed. While had-too-much-Rum-sfeld's quote was pretty stupid, there must have been far, far worse ones out there.
Ahnold's was better, although it was just a garbled speech. I think Rumsfeld probably meant to say his quote.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Languages change over time and distance, especially in the centuries (3 or so) that we've been separated without the benefit of mass communications. Did they not teach this in school?
However, if you truly believe that "American" is a separate language or dialect (as the above quote implies), then you too must be irritated at these people because they are awarding their award to people who don't even speak the same language. |
A dialect of a language, in this instance, English, is still English. Mr. Rumsfeld's speech, whilst not being on the same level of verbal leadenness as the regulations for the ground nut scheme in Africa, or varieties of management speak in business manuals or government agencies, is still a dense thicket of badly thought through unnecessarily repetitious prose.
Not exactly the lucidity of the Gettysburg Address, is it?
I happen to believe that professional manglers of clear English, such as academics, post modernist culture commentators and politicians all deserve skewering on the lance of their own prolixity.
There is usually a point for repetition in public speaking: incantatory, emphatic use of terms helps put a point across, or clarifies a situation, or helps stir a crowd. Can you truly say that any of these was achieved by Rumsfeld's cloud of unknowing?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|