 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Actually I think communism and christianity are the closest a socioeconomic ideology and a metaphysical dogma can go in economic terms.
Help those in need etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
In a way it "forces" you if you wanna go to heaven. Also we're talking about the "preachings" of the two, which appear to be very similar.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
Ramo,
quote: As they ought to own the means of production, Micheal Dell is using state power to enforce appropriation of the computers from his employees, and I thus bought unjustly confiscated goods. |
1)The workers should only own the means of production is a)the signed a contract giving them control, or b)they created the means of production, using their own resources, with no voluntary contract giving the means of production over to someone else.
The workers, by and large, are also incompetent to own and operate a corporation such as Dell 
2)As Berz pointed out, they agreed to give the results of their labor to Dell.
You say this was a coerced agreement, but it, in fact was not. Coercion means somebody forced you to do something. You wouldn't consider the need to eat to be coercive, would you? Natural necessities are not coercive, they are facts of life. The need to eat is a fact of life, and if you want to fulfill that need, you have to find some way to get food. That way to get food is to either grow the food, steal the food, or buy the food. If you can grow all that you need, great. But most people have gotten past that hunter-gatherer nomadic mentality, and don't wanna do it anymore. If you want to, though, go ahead. As for outright stealing, surely you don't think it's OK for people to randomly raid cornfields that belong to others, right? And as for buying food, you need money for that. The way to get money is to perform a service for someone who has money, which is exactly what the workers of Dell are doing. How this is immoral is beyond me - it is only immoral and coercive if a)the will to survive is immoral, or b)you believe a natural need is coercive in the same way that an interaction between humans can be coercive. If you take option B, that's your prerogative, naturally, but it doesn't really get you anywhere, so there it is.
I'll deal with the rest of that nonsense about how Christianity's ultimate goal is socialism later, after class/work. Suffice it to say I've dealt with monkspider before on this issue, using the text of the New Testament, and if he wants to go down that road again, fine by me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
The next reincarnation of Jesus was Che but noone realized it. They even looked the same.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|