 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Defiant
|
 |
WISCONSIN
Aug 1999 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Yes, Europe and Japan are notorious for having such low-wage steel workers with horrendous working conditions and crappy benefits.

Is what you're "defiant" of rational thought? |
It is not just the steel workers, all imports, look at the back of the items you buy in the next week, I doubt you will see anything from Europe or Japan, try Asia, Phillipines and Mexico, this steel tarriff is the beginning to where Bush wants to go with this. You want to know why this country is losing jobs, you can try and blame Bush but you're an idiot if you do, job loss started long before Bush, it is the pushing of US jobs across seas, because it can be done cheaper. The United States is in a horrific trade imbalance and it doesn't go well for us US workers.
A fairer system to all would be fair trade equilivent to differences in wages, that would go both ways.
Look, if the USA is on top of the economic pinnacle and we want world trade and somebody is at the bottom, it is a fair assessment that the top as to give in order for the bottom to gain, and I don't particuarly want to give up something just so China is better off. Now if you want to say that the US imposed a 30% trade on China because their wages are 30% of the US, all fair now in love, war and economics. I think America should protect her jobs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Defiant
It is not just the steel workers, all imports, look at the back of the items you buy in the next week, I doubt you will see anything from Europe or Japan, try Asia, Phillipines and Mexico, this steel tarriff is the beginning to where Bush wants to go with this. You want to know why this country is losing jobs, you can try and blame Bush but you're an idiot if you do, job loss started long before Bush, it is the pushing of US jobs across seas, because it can be done cheaper. The United States is in a horrific trade imbalance and it doesn't go well for us US workers.
A fairer system to all would be fair trade equilivent to differences in wages, that would go both ways.
Look, if the USA is on top of the economic pinnacle and we want world trade and somebody is at the bottom, it is a fair assessment that the top as to give in order for the bottom to gain, and I don't particuarly want to give up something just so China is better off. Now if you want to say that the US imposed a 30% trade on China because their wages are 30% of the US, all fair now in love, war and economics. I think America should protect her jobs. |
This rant is a non-sequitur. If you think Bush was concerned with human rights and wages, you're defiantly delusional. Bush was pulling a cheap stunt to woo blue-collar voters in industrial states. If he was concerned with wages and rights, why include Europe and Japan, which have arguably better conditions for workers?
It backfired, largely because Bush's corporate cronies got steamed at their increased costs, so now he has to wipe the egg off his face and deal with the steel workers. How he could reconcile these tariffs with his election stances on free trade, I don't know.
Protecting steel worker jobs is an impossible, losing scenario and will only lead to economic problems for both the U.S. and other countries. The rising costs to corporations won't be tolerated either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:32
|
|
no way rah... these tariffs were retarded. If the American steel industry is too inept to adapt and compete, it should deserve to fail. And in addition, it's terribly hypocritical of Bush to be imposing these tariffs when he's constantly championing for a free-trade zone.
Having said that... if America's steel industries are suffering because of the exploitation of cheap labor, then I wouldn't have such an objection to such tariffs. The tariffs then, would be a product of the flawed aspects of free-trade agreements not containing standards for labor wages, unionization, and slave/child labor. But, as Boris pointed out, the tariffs were aimed at European countries and Japan... countries that have high labor standards.
Plus, look at the motives of Bush. He was pandering to two states he lost in the 2000 election: Michigan and Pennsylvania. As with just about everything, Bush's actions were entirely self-serving.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
aaglo
|
 |
the contradiction is filled with holes...
Aug 2001 time: 07:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Defiant
Q,
Some can say a lack of tariffs can kill business, it is your idea of what kind of business. I saw in the news a while back that Japan tried to have lumber cut in Washington state and Oregon in the US, then have it shipped to Japan turned it into the final product, whether paper, lumber, whatever and they were going to do it cheaper than the US, I can't believe they have that much of a technological advantage in thata field on the US, it has to be labor intensive. |
The Japanese factory production systems are very efficient. Just believe it. The working culture in Japan is different from USA, that affects too. Instead of lay-offs, they allways re-train the old employees (which causes huge saves in severance pays and lawsuits).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Q,
Some can say a lack of tariffs can kill business, it is your idea of what kind of business. |
the lack of tariffs, yes, will kill business. the business that die will die because they were unable to adapt and compete, and therefore it's their own damn fault.
quote: I saw in the news a while back that Japan tried to have lumber cut in Washington state and Oregon in the US, then have it shipped to Japan turned it into the final product, whether paper, lumber, whatever and they were going to do it cheaper than the US, I can't believe they have that much of a technological advantage in thata field on the US, it has to be labor intensive. |
perhaps they were going to use the burakumin. they need work anyhow. if they weren't dumping, and they can do it cheaper, why not let them?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|