 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I think most hetero men who have a problem with gays can't get past the idea of anal sex.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I think it has more to do with not being able to look at someone else's hairy, sweaty genitals. |
But I don't have a problem with gays, and I don't want to see that!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Does the fundamental root of homophobia lie in individual-oriented psychology, or within a broader sociological factor??
I have thought about this the past few days, and here is what I think.
The root of homophobia lies in conservative heterosexuals' desire to externalize an internal problem that is perceived to exist within heterosexual society. In other words, that these particular heterosexuals want to scapegoat homosexuals for what they perceive as being problematic but is originating from within heterosexual society.
|
I think that this might be true from some. But most of them come from a religous view point that it is just moraly wrong. This may be simple, but that is how many who dont want gay marrage feel for example.
quote:
The problem that these conservative heterosexuals perceive, is that marriage as how it has traditionally been held in high-esteem (whether that is mythical history, or historical reality is another question) has degenerated to a mere pact of convenience that can be disavowed if it becomes "inconvenient" to maintain that marriage.
Whether or not the sacredeness of marriage was EVER a reality in some past period, is another question. Here, I'm talking about conservative heterosexuals who PERCEIVE this idealized vision of what marriage used to be like, compared to what they perceive the state of marriage today, as an institution.
So, this perceived degradation of marriage is not happening because of homosexuals -- it is within heterosexual society that marriage has been degraded -- based on the biased perceptions of conservative heterosexuals. Marriage/family within heterosexual society has long-since changed:
1) 50% or more heterosexuals divorce rather than working out issues that could be worked out in many of these marriages.
2) Heterosexuals are part of the social phenomenon of drive-through, Las Vegas style weddings.
3) There are an increasing number of non-traditional, but still heterosexual-oriented families (foster families, children raised by grandparents, single parent families, and so on)
It seems like society might be in a transitional period, where the traditional, agrarian-based family has ultimately failed to adapt to post-industrial, modern society and as a result, there will be fundamental changes in the future (we can't foresee what the results will be though).
|
First I dont think that they family unit as we know has failed to adapt to changing times. It just show the weakness in character of humans. People always want an easy way out. This has happened in the past as well, not just during our time, allthough I think it is now a much bigger problem. Most people dont have a clue to what marrage is about. Also some people when they pick someone to marry dont make a very good choice.
quote:
So, it could be that conservative heterosexuals who are mortified by the above societal factors and developments, see these changes as being completely problematic. Instead of advocating for adapting to new concepts of family to stabliize our society, they argue for holding onto what MIGHT be anachronistic values that no longer apply to the reality of post-industrial modern society.
And they seek to hold onto what might be anachronistic concepts of family by externalizing these internal problems within heterosexual society, onto a group of people they can scapegoat -- homosexuals. Rather than face what they perceive to be problems within heterosexual society through adaptation, they want to scapegoat homosexuals to hold onto what might be just sentimental, anachronistic concepts of family.
These conservative heterosexuals may be venting their anger about these internal problems of heterosexual society by lashing out against homosexuals.
|
First off I think this is a generalization that you are making. There are some that try to help people understand what marrage is all about, and that one should not view it so lightly. Also you have to remember, that as far as the government is concerned, many conservivates and I think leberals as well would not like the government telling people what to do.
quote:
What does anyone think about these thoughts? Do you have ideas on how this idea can be further reinforced, or do you have a completely different idea from this?
And are the changes within heterosexual society towards concept of family simply PERCEIVED as degradation, and is it really just transitory change that could bring either good OR bad results?? |
I think you have made too many generalizations.
I think that homophobia is much simpler that what you make it out to be. It I think is the same as racism. People fear what is different and thus hate it. And since they hate it, they try to find reasons to hate it. Like people blaming Jews for all kinds of problems the have nothing to do with.
I dont think homophobia is arround because conservatives are looking for a escape goat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
The fundamental root of homophobia is homophobia being unnatural.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
You've obviously never seen them, so please...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Uh . . . . this was not my argument. |
u say that lesbians rock cuz men dominate society. but lesbians would rock either way. cuz men and women are different. and that difference doesn't stem from who gets paid more.
case in point, women are not sexually satisfied by watching 2 guys go at it.
so to say that the only reason women who are bi(more accurately) are not disdained is cuz guys rule is pure nonsense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
This thread is ***
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Nah. sexism was present even when homosexuality wasn't that frowned upon, like ancient greece, etc.
And vice versa, btw. |
That doesn't dispute what I wrote, because in that particular case, it was within defined male roles to want young men/teen boys for particuar forms of sexual pleasure. Even in this socety, however, it was still frowned upon to prefer men sexually to women (if you were a man). In man/boy sex, the penis was put between the thighs of the boy. Anal and oral sex was out, unless the boy wanted to be known as a girl man. Men do not allow themselves to be penetrated. To be penetratd was to become a woman, and to be in for some serious social disapproval.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|