 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Mercator
|
 |
Sorekara no Nanimo
Jan 1970 time: 06:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Yes he WROTE the hobbit first. But he conceived of LOTR first, which your source does not note. I beleive i saw that in Tolkiens own preface to LOTR, where he talks of putting aside the "unpublishable" LOTR to write the Hobbit, then spends the next several years writing LOTR. |
I think you're mixing up the Silmarillion and LOTR...
quote: Foreword to the Second Edition of "Lord of the Rings"
This tale grew in the telling, until it became a history of the Great War of the Ring and included many glimpses of the yet more ancient history that preceded it. It was begun soon after The Hobbit was written and before its publication in 1937 [...] |
Just nitpicking... 
quote: And of course Silm was written first, but published later - thats what i meant when i said silm was the reverse. sorry if my wording was unclear. |
Ah yes... I misread.
Anyway, The Hobbit is definitely my favourite of the books I've read (Hobbit, LOTR, Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales). LOTR is probably second.
I'll probably go see ROTK in January, I'm in no rush.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
I'm seeing this 3 hour and 42 minute behemoth tonight at 7:30 pm!
And I love the Silmarillion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
I promised to watch it with my wife. We're taking off Monday (daytime) to watch it, hopefully so the theatre isn't quite as packed.
This does mean my abstaining from just going in the meantime... ahh.. the things we do for love.
I heard there is an IMAX print. I wonder if Lowes Time Square will be showing it... and when?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
my name is mentioned as Denethor's father
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Brilliant. Absolutely ****ing brilliant.
See it ASAP.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:32
|
|
as a whole, the trilogy is pretty well done, if full of changes compared to the books though. the debate is irrelevant though, since a 1-1 translation of the book would have made for a boring movie. however I detest most scenes showing civilian suffering. call me a cynic, but that's too emotion-based and too far away from the whole fantasy thing. I can only enjoy an orc storm onto a human city if I don't have to see crying mothers with little babies. too close to reality, as silly as it sounds... fantasy is an escapist genre after all, not a critical one.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|