 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
I just looked it up, and you're right, of course.
For anyone interested, this website provides a nice visual representation of the world's language families:
http://www.ship.edu/~psych/languagefamilies.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
Bullshit. States dont have the right to infringe on the rights of others, or to coerce them into working for free. And btw, your fearless leaders dont believe in states rights either: they just play any fiddle to keep more power to themselves. Take John Ashcroft, a true American patriot. While he was governor, he was pro states rights. Now that hes attorney general, hes trying to prosecute medical weed users in California, when the people of california have ratified the use of it. Smooth move Asscroft.
And btw, slavery wasnt legal, it just wasnt illegal. Maybe people forgot to read the constitution since it states that all men are created equal. That was a real bugger to plantation owners, and the southern business class. So to get around it, the southern states said that slaves arnt people, they are property. But then to get more representation in congress, they counted each slave as 3/5th of a person. What a sham. |
Lawrence, of course slavery was made legal in the Constitution by any number of provisions including a provision for the remand of escaped slaves that Northern States were ignoring. The bit about "all men are created equal" is not in the constitution, but in the Declaration of Independence.
But your point about weed is well taken. I think that the Feds are really trampling on States Rights to the extent they declare illegal that which the states declare legal in the area of traditional police powers. This draws into constitutional question Federal Drug laws that deal in more than just interstate transportation of illegal drugs.
But it is Ashcroft's duty to enforce the laws of the United States. It is the courts who have to say that the laws or unconstitution. This has nothing to do with Aschroft's personal views on States Rights.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
GePap,
quote: Since the monicker of states right was defeated, the rights of individuals have increased greatly, specially becuase the rights of states could be overcome. |
This is actually a very positive thing.
Although I still believe that secession was and is Constitutional.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Yet, incredibley, the existence of slavery in the South was not under attack. |
It most definitely was. The Republicans wanted to end immediately foreign commerce in slaves, to declare territories free, to abolish Dred Scot and in the end abolish slavery in the South. How can anyone interpret the ultimate objective as anything other than the complete abolition of slavery in the US. Here is a quote from Linclon's House Diveded speach:
Springfield, Illinois, June 16, 1858
MR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN OF THE CONVENTION:
If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South.
...
[W]e may, ere long, see filled with another Supreme Court decision, declaring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a State to exclude slavery from its limits....
Such a decision is all that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all the States. Welcome, or unwelcome, such decision is probably coming, and will soon be upon us, unless the power of the present political dynasty shall be met and overthrown. We shall lie down pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the verge of making their State free, and we shall awake to the reality instead, that the Supreme Court has made Illinois a slave State. To meet and overthrow the power of that dynasty, is the work now before all those who would prevent that consummation. That is what we have to do. How can we best do it?"
http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/divided.htm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
not.
quite.
true.
1. a lot of people are proud of their southern heritage.
2. the confederate flag is the only real symbol left of that southern heritage.
3. not all people who fly the confederate flag are racists.
4. unfortunately, the meaning of the confederate flag has been hijacked by racists.
5. not unlike the swastika, because of this hijacking, the flag is now forever tainted, even if those that have respect for it do not agree with those who hijacked it.
6. the japanese rising sun flag was once not offensive at all.
7. however, because of the events that transpired under it, for example, the bombing of pearl harbor, the rape of nanjing, and the occupation of korea, it has become offensive.
8. its meaning has been hijacked, meaning that even those who like the flag but deplore the actions cannot easily profess their like of the flag without having others come to the wrong conclusion.
9. the american flag stands for many things. it stands for freedom, for instance.
10. it also stands for the destruction of the native americans.
11. or the occupation of the philippines.
12. or the invasion and annexation of many mexican lands.
13. if the american flag were hijacked by extremists, its meaning would also change.
14. not all southerners hate jews.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Q cubed, from your posts here, you should be a Republican. |

does the fact that i detest bush, despise how he's handled foreign policy, have no problem with raising taxes, would like to see both more regulation of businesses coupled with more responsibility from business, and absolutely despise party politics doesn't count for too much?

quote: However, I strongly disagree with you about people who fly the Stars and Bars and defend its display. They flaunt their racism. |
i know of plenty of people who feel the stars and bars reflects their heritage; they feel that the sculpture of robert e. lee that graces stone mountain speaks of his honor in battle and not so much some of the things his battle was defending; who have no problem with other races, and let their relatives marry them; who are flat out not racist--
who fly that flag because their great great great great great great great great great granddaddy was one of the first settlers who came over on one of those british boats.
therefore, i have to come to the conclusion that no matter what the flag means to the general public (that of racism), even if that meaning wasn't quite the original meaning of the flag, some of those who fly it fly it for reasons that are completely non-racist.
could they have a better symbol? probably. is there one? i can't think of any.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Q Cubed
in any case, while that was what the republicans rebelled against, the political positions of both parties kinda reversed. like earth's magnetic poles. |
No it hasn't. The Republican Party is not for slavery, for segregation, or for States Rights in the sense that the South was for Stated Rights. The Republican party is for private enterprise, for patriotism and for a foreign policy designed to spread democracy, for family rights and for more conservative social practices, and for freedom of religion. Most Southerners today identify with the Republicans because they agree with these core issues.
You should also understand that the Republican Party was always in favor of civil rights legislation while the Democrat Party opposed it. Johnson allied with Dirksen, the Republican leader in the Senate, to get the Civil Rights act of 1964 through the Democrat filibuster lead by Al Gore's dad.
Democrats are truly fond of rewriting history to somehow paint themselves as holier than thou, when in truth, the history of that party has largely been despicable.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|