 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
I don't see it as either tasteless or insensitive.
How many people died in the firebombing of Tokyo? In Japanese labour camps?
Weapons kill people because other people choose, or are forced, to use them. EG is just a piece of metal. Should we close all museums that display guns, military aircraft, tanks, warships, etc? I don't think so. Pretending these weapons never existed isn't helpful.
We should stop apologising, or expecting others to apologise, for wars and atrocities ordered by people long dead. But then it is harder to face current issues than argue over the past.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
The most tasteless and insensitive museum exhibit ever?
I guess that would be V.I. Lenin's mummified corpse on permanent display in a glass coffin for ahistoric lefties to worship.
But maybe that's just me. |
I've seen Lenin's Mausoleum and I don't think it was tasteless. I thought it was done rather well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
Of course you didn't think it was tasteless, since you didn't give his countless victims one single thought while you were there.
|
How exactly do you know that. Are you a mindreader?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JimmyCracksCorn
|
|
Macedonia - Sovereign country north of Greece.
Dec 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
I agree and while that may be disturbing, it's not such a big deal. This is like the Brits displaying a Lancaster and noting that it was used over Dresden without further comment, or the Japanese showing off an artillery piece that was used at Nangking.
Hiroshima is the supreme horror of the modern age, to soften it in any way is akin to denying the holocaust - whatever one thinks of the rightness of the attack. |
Death is death, dude. It doesn't really matter how you die, just so long as you're dead.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
I agree and while that may be disturbing, it's not such a big deal. This is like the Brits displaying a Lancaster and noting that it was used over Dresden without further comment, . |
Pretty sure S for Sugar at Hendon was used on Dresden - so what?
Most of the fatalities there were accidental - we couldn't have predicted a firestorm.
Would you rather we forgot these events? It's hard to tell from your posts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
would it be good to put the Enola Gay in historical context - yes. But a large number of americans, probably the majority, would not consider simply discussing the Japanese vicitims to be a complete context. They would want some discussion of the entire war, including Japanese atrocities, the possible costs of an invasion of Japan, etc. To present the casualties at Hiroshima without that context would be seen by them as a unbalanced presentation. This is precisely the issue that came up when parts of the Enola Gay were previously displayed.
again, the majority of americans do not see this as analogous to Auschwitz. You may disagree, but there it is.
Also the air and space museum displays a number of warplanes, including German, British, etc. It does not discuss civilian victims in those cases, and most Americans would question making an exception for the Enola Gay. As was said above this is an air and space flight museum, not a general history museum.
Of course there you have a larger issue - this museum does glorify aviation, and implicitly air power. and as everyone know, airpower since 1943 and for the foreseeable future is an area of American dominance and a key component of American power. Unfortunately no discussion of the morality of strategic bombing is possible in a veil of ignorance from that fact.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
I oppose the atomic bombings (and the entire war) as much as anybody, but I fail to see how displaying a VERY FAMOUS historical artifact from the war is wrong. It may be insensitive to people who lived through the war, but then again no one forces them to look at it. Personally, I'd definitely go see the Enola Gay - I was disappointed at having missed it at the National Air and Space Museum a few years ago.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Of course there you have a larger issue - this museum does glorify aviation, and implicitly air power. and as everyone know, airpower since 1943 and for the foreseeable future is an area of American dominance and a key component of American power. Unfortunately no discussion of the morality of strategic bombing is possible in a veil of ignorance from that fact. |
I don't think everyone knows that airpower is the key to succes and power. I know that dissenting scholars will argue that the key is people's armies. Always has been and always will be. The reason that airpower get so much attention is that it is profitable for scientists to imply that it is.
No nation has been forced by aireal bombardment of strategic assets to surrender. Only when landforces have occupied the centre have nations surrendered. And not even then in all cases.
The reason the Japanese surrendered was that 75 percent of their fishing fleet was sunk and their oil suppply cut off. They had also used up all their reserves of bauxite, used to make alluminium from.
The nukes were simply icing on the cake.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
From the article.
"The Enola Gay bears a label describing it as the "most sophisticated propeller-driven bomber of World War II".
History sans any value judgment?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|