 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by bfg9000
Yeah that is rather insensitive, but I think this one might be more tastless and insensitive.
Hitler praying |
What exactly is tasteless and insensitive here?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kropotkin
I'm not at all disturbed by the exihibit itself, some of the visitors seems to be quite tasteless and insensitive in my humble opinion. ****ing moron, like any (with the possible existance of a few exceptions) of the civilians victims at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had anything to do with Perl Harbor or the Nanjing massacre. Why is it so damn hard for some people to tell the difference between individual civilians and the acts of governments and armies? ****ing ****ers I say. |
Yes but you forget that at the time Americans were very racist towards the Japanese. For instance they thought that the Japanese because of their slanted eyes, could not fly airplanes properly. Also the Japanese Americans were put into concentration camps because they were more succesful than white Americans. So at that time all Japanese were simply 'Japs' or 'Gooks', and the average American citizen could not distinguish between a military 'gook' and a civilian 'gook'. Just like today is difficult for the average American to distinguish between the terrorist 'raghead' and the civilian 'raghead'.
Of course in turn the Japanese were very racist towards the Chinese, who they believed were inheriently dirty.
So in short while its is easy for almost all civilized nations today to distinguish and not be racist it was perhaps not as easy then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by bfg9000
Hitler never showed any remorse for his actions. So he must be praying for the chance to kill 6 million more Jews. Even if he's not praying about that, does he deserve whatever forgiveness he's asking from you? The idea that he would deserve that forgiveness is tasteless and insensitive. |
Everything he did was perfectly legal, so I don't think he is asking for forgiveness.
Maybe he is asking for mercy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Oh no, there are lots more tasteless museum exhibits than that... Napoleon's penis, for example.
My gut reaction is that EG should not be an exhibit, although there is a good argument for having it around as a warning for future generations.
I mean, your argument that "this killed a lot of civilians" could be used as an excuse to tear down Auschwitz and turn it into a shopping mall.
I can understand A-bomb survivors being furious - but I would rather wait to see the finished exhibit before condermning it.
Last edited by Cruddy on 17-12-2003 at 21:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
From the article:
"They (Japan) started the war by bombing our servicemen in Pearl Harbor. They should go and stand on the deck of the Arizona," said one man referring to a US ship sunk in the raid, now a memorial.
But this is not representative of how the majority of Americans feel today. In fact there was a program on National geographic were some Japanese airmen who served in the attack on Pearl habour visited the Arizona. They met with a group of American sailors who were also at there at the time. There was no bad feelings between them, and they agreed that they had all been involved in something which was beyond their control.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
I fail to see how this is insensitive, that plain symbolized the end of world war 2 and the entering of the atomic era..... anything historically true deserves to be in a museum, just done tastefully.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
it wasn't America that dropped the Bomb. The responsibility rests with Truman. He made the call.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|