 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
BTW I don't think I've ever heard of any other european country having a problem with that except France. How come?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
The whole obsession with secularism in France has something to do with a long and painful history. France, "the eldes daughter of the Church" tried to escape the clutches of the catholic Church for a long time, and was only successful at it under the 3rd Republic, with 20 years of constant struggles between both sides.
School was an especially important battlefield between both sides. In the end, a status quo was found, and private schools (up to 20% of the total students) were allowed to be religious. Everytime a government tries to change the status quo in one sense or another, you can bet the education minister will be driven out by the unrest.
The reasons why the French views of separation of Church and State are so different with the US' (or of most other European countries' for that matter) comes from this history specific to us.
The real question that is asked by the Islamic Scarf is "Is school supposed to be a place where all religions are free to be expressed, or is school supposed to be a place devoid of religious proselytism?"
Chirac considers schools ought to be devoid of religious proselytism, and our lengthy debate has shown there are good arguments for each side.
I personally support Chirac on this one. I share with him a deep concern about seeing our country becoming more and more torn apart between radicalizing communities. Now, if we don't do anything else to promote integration, this law will end up being counterproductive. However, if we have a real encompassing program to promote integration, this law will be a complement to it. |
"promoting integration" just sounds wrong and dirty.
must be that damn american individualism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mazarin
The state needs to actively promote integration: we haven't been doing this during the last decades and what we got are paralel societies where children are raised without learning the language properly and therefor deprived of many of the freedoms our societies grant. Just leave these people behind and let them do the dirty and badly-paid jobs would be much more convenient, of course. |
why would that be more convenient?
freedom includes the freedom to fail.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DAVOUT
|
 |
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
STANDARDIZED - FACTORY - UNIFORM
Dear Freedom-minded Brits, Norwegians, Finns, Swiss, Poles, etc - be VERY careful what you're commiting yourselves to. |
Yes, these words are politically incorrect; I see that you get it.
Of course, in the US the children are individually educated, and your are pleased with excellent results. Here, we have only a mass education system in which the individual have to adapt themselves to the limitations due to the life in society. There is no room for medieval behaviours hiding political objectives.
But the freedom enjoyed by islamists in the US is likely known by them, and they certainly appreciate to be welcome by you if they ever decided to emigrate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mazarin
yavoon,
Sure, but I don't want children to be deprived of the chances to succeed because of the family they were born into. That's why we have a madantory and free school system; that's why we help students from poor families during their university studies. Don't tell me that blacks in the US are overrepresented in prisons due to all the freedoms they've had.
Ned,
So, what is the US society based upon? What values is the US trying to spread all over the world? If I go to the US, apply for citizenship later and claim, I think it should be governed by a Saddam-type dictator and the sharia
is the only law I'm willing to follow, will I be accepted as clearly as someone showing that he understood and respected US constitution and its laws? |
freedom isnt acceptance.
and opportunity and coercion are different things.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
Polygamous Mormons might disagree, Ned. Besides which, it isn't as if the United States reached this supposed state of perfection without having had anti-Catholic laws, and apartheid. Gosh, what was the Civil Rights movement about? Astonishing that it took nearly a hundred years to reach the conclusion that perhaps their citizens of African origin might not be getting the same deal as caucasian ones, despite having fought a civil war over it.
And please- don't give me a boring lecture on Australia's history, because I'm not Australian and I'm perfectly aware of it.
Everybody can crow about how wonderful their own country is, but when our houses are made even partially out of glass, then we shouldn't throw stones. |
Molly, I have no disagreement with this post. We progressed and still much to do on relations with minorities of all kinds. But our ideals today are to integrate, not to segregate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|