 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Ok. I'm reading Al Franken (Jewish BTW) and I think he makes a pretty strong case that many famous media personalities who where until this moment totally unbeknownst to me, are in fact "greedy, evil, warmongering bigots.
And the funny thing is that they all support the Republican Party.
So:
For instance when Richard Mellon Scaife, a giver of 35$ million to the Heritage foundation, funded numerous other institutions like the Cato institute, the Hoover institution,the American enterprise Institute, and many more, called a journalist, and I quote:
"You ****ing commuist cvnt" and said, she was ugly and her teeth terrible, and when he bid her good-bye said to her "Don't look behind you!".
, well then i would just have to ask whether the socallled liberal segment of the American society is going to stand to accept this bvllsheet.
And what about push polls. Those who know are in the "know".
Well. As a European I would just have to say that the Republican Perty now stands for me as the most ultimate form of evil the world has ever seen. More evil than the Nazi party because it has more power, and it is much more dishonest. You just don't treat a woman that way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
"And the funny thing is that they all support the Republican Party."
And why is this odd, coming from Al Franken? It would be like complaining that all Limbaugh does is bash Democrats - well, duh! |
All I know about mr. Limbaugh is that he had a pimple on his behind so that he could not take over from us during the war in Indochine. Please do not sidetrack the issue.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
You are Sava's DL, aren't you?
But you're right - one person calling a woman a **** is so much worse than another killing 6 million people because of their religion. |
Hitler didn't give a fvck about these guy's religion. Don't start me on the Holocaust, because it can get ugly.
Hitler was a shithead and genocidic bastard, true. But he was part of a MAJOR European crisis that ran from 1914 to 1945.
On the other hand, American imperialism is much more dangerous in that it springs from itself with no other reason than pleasing its huge corporations. And it is winning, while Hitler was obviously doomed to failure.
In such a way, we can consider it more dangerous. Remember, danger is about potential threat, not past one.
But still, we could run a "death-statistics" contest. Trust me, if we considered the death toll of Vietnam + all US supported wars and despotic regimes, and then add indirect deaths caused by their economic policy (starvations caused in part by agricultural subsidies, refusal to let African countries manufacture generic medications), America would not be very far from the top, along with such great leaders as Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: I am saying that a person who calls a respectable woman "a fvcking communkst cvnt", because she discloses his ties to the Republican Party is not a real gentleman. |
And what if he didn't want those ties disclosed for business reasons or something? Then the woman was out of line and deserved being called what she was. |
But firstly he had not had time for a true philosophical discussion with her on the nature of communism, secondly if he did not want to have those tie to the Republican Party denied he could have invited her for a dinner. Clearly he had no experience in how to handle a feisty woman. And I thinK that has to do that he is homosexual.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
No-one answer my hypothesis.
Is:
Republican supporters are homosexual.
Thesis rest on. They don't know how to treat women correctly. Not even when it is startegic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Permit me to 
Of course agricultural subsidies by other nations kill no-one, just American subsidies?
And how does Bayer feel about allowing African countries manufacture their latest meds?
Of course, if you want to pull statistics out of your ass, please, by all means, do so. |
I said "caused in part". IN PART.
Never said the others are any better. USA are the worse because they are the most powerful, that's all. Nothing else. Throughout history, the worst usually came from the most powerful ones. Now that doesn't come out of my ass. Plain logics, that is.
And Bayer? Remember "indirect deaths caused by economic policy". Indirect. Which means USA is valuing Bayer's profits over the life of millions. Fine. Now they are working to make it stay that way. Increase the length of patents duration. Impose economic sanctions against governments trying to manufacture their own drugs. Now I love the way you put it: "how does Bayer feel?". That's correct.
US government=Bayer. I call this a threat.
Personnally, how do YOU feel? would you rather allow millions to be cured, or see Bayer's president get a few more millions in stock-options?
Saying "all right, countries with X AIDS problems or X poverty can make their own" is not hard at all.
But since US GOVERNMENT=BAYER+MEDIA TRUSTS, they'll make sure you don't even want this to happen. If ever you do, they still have the police and the army.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Homosexuals can't treat women correctly? Considering you seem to have a problem with treating human beings correctly, making this charge is laughable.
I'm hoping this is all just a troll, because if you're really this brayingly stupid, I have to wonder how you survived this long without poisoning yourself on lead paint chips at some point. |
I never said that homosexuals can't treat woman correctly. Homosexual can treat woman very good.
However many socalled 'butch' homosexuals have very bad experience with woman. They stay in trenches too long. Or they are in strange schools. Or they are too long with stockbrokers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|