 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
No, what it means is I'll take Bush plus an additional 5 points. So, for instance, if Dean wins 52/48, I win (48+5>52).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I know. Easiest $20 I've made all year.
...only $20 I've made all year...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:33
|
|
"Why do you say that? Both Ohio and WV were tight races in 2000. Jobs usually determine who wins, and steel is very imporant in both states."
They were reasonably close, but not very. That Jobs determine who wins is conventional wisdowm that used to be alot more true than it is now. Contemporary research shows that social issues are far more important then ever before. With recent legislative action on partial birth abortion and with gay right issues being all over the news, expect this factor increase. Research has also shown that OH and WV rank up with the South in terms of more traditional values. Foreign policy being a major issue will crowd out economics even more.
"
IIRC, those polls were taken in September. That doesn't tell you anything."
it tells you what people thought at the time, and the numbers were similar for all democratic candidates.
"More recent national polls (like the CNN one a little while ago) show the gap to be much smaller."
Do you have a link showing to a more recent poll in Ohio?
"The midwest isn't that socially conservative. Not anything like that South, anyways. That's why Dems are perfectly competitive there, even have advanges in places like Iowa. And if farm subsidies go, so will their support for Shrub"
The Dems are competitive in the upper midewest, comprising much of the so called "rust belt", and in fact except for Indiana and Ohio they mostly won there. In the Great Plains they are not very competetive at all, though.
"Links to polls?"
www.dcpoliticalreport.com
"Dean is so far ahead fiscally that I think he's virtually bagged it."
I can't say I agree with you. There is alot of concern in the Democratic Party about Dean's viability and electability, and I suspect those supporting other candidates will coalesece around another candidate.
"Dean is much closer to Bush than Gore was at this time four years ago. Gore came behind from a 17-point defict to beat Bush in the popular vote (only to have victory snatched). Dean's only behind 8 points, and Bush still has a sucky job situation to deal with, three million jobs down . . . still."
You're making a mistake that early polls always benefit The Democrats. Not so. In 2000, the Democrats were the incumbent party and they narrowed the lead. Leading up to the 1996 and and 1984, Clinton and Reagan were both polling poorly yet won re-election handily. In 1998 Dukakis had a large lead over Bush I initally but came back to win in the end. Bush II is polling stronger then either Clinton or Reagan did coming into their re-election campaigns.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|