09-01-2004 06:55									#1
	Powell: No evidence of al-Qaida link Inflate your Upload Space

Powell admits what we all know...No concrete evidence of a link between Iraq and al-Qaida. However...where there is smoke there is fire. Powell also says that he believes their was a link.

quote: Powell: No ‘smoking gun’ Jan. 8: But the secretary of state insisted the United States was right to invade Iraq. NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports. Nightly News No proof links Iraq, al-Qaida, Powell says Chief weapons inspector reportedly about to quit NBC, MSNBC and news services Updated: 8:11 p.m. ET Jan. 08, 2004WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell reversed a year of administration policy, acknowledging Thursday that he had seen no “smoking gun [or] concrete evidence” of ties between former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida. Powell, speaking at a news conference at the State Department, stressed that he was still certain that Iraq had dangerous weapons and needed to be disarmed by force, and he sharply disagreed with a private think tank report that maintained that Iraq was not an imminent threat to the United States. “I have not seen smoking gun, concrete evidence about the connection, but I do believe the connections existed,” he said. Powell’s observation marked a turning point in administration arguments in support of the U.S. invasion of Iraq last spring. The assertion that Saddam and the terrorist network led by Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden were working in concert was a primary justification for the war. As recently as September, President Bush declared that there was “no question” that Saddam had ties to al-Qaida. Powell himself made the case most strongly in February, when he urged the U.N. Security Council to back U.S. military action in Iraq. “Iraqi officials deny accusations of ties with al-Qaida,” Powell said then. “These denials are simply not credible.” Powell defended those comments Thursday, even as he cast doubt on their conclusions. He said that at the time, he was referring specifically to the presence of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Baghdad for medical treatments. The United States has accused al-Zarqawi of being a close associate of bin Laden’s, but intelligence agencies in France and other European countries that opposed the U.S. war argued that al-Zarqawi was an independent operator. “I'm confident of what I presented last year,” Powell said. “The intelligence community is confident of the material they gave me. I was representing them. It was information they presented to the Congress. It was information they had presented publicly, and they stand behind it. And this game is still unfolding.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ID/3909150/

	09-01-2004 07:18									#2
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Well, it is good that Powell tries to restore his credibility, after the disgrace of last year in the UN

As for the administration blatantly lying to favor the war: is it still a surprise to anybody?
And if not, I wonder what Bush enthusiastics can say to justify the fact that he had to manipulate you guys to get support. What were his motives, if he needed to get support so badly he had to blatantly lie to you? Really?

	09-01-2004 07:42									#3
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

how about the disgrace of the French sucking on Saddam's red rosy and doing it for cash. cheese eating surrender monkeys with shade for marching Germans.

	09-01-2004 07:51									#4
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote: Originally posted by TCO how about the disgrace of the French sucking on Saddam's red rosy and doing it for cash. cheese eating surrender monkeys with shade for marching Germans.

Not a bad two liner. If I analyse it, it features:
- French are gays
- a usual reference everybody who was around during the war knows
- an obscure reference to a joke posted a few days ago
- a complete lack of continuity, only to allow as many insults with as few words as possible.

Really, I'm impressed

	09-01-2004 07:54									#5
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

De rien.

	09-01-2004 07:57									#6
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: No concrete evidence of a link between Iraq and al-Qaida. However...where there is smoke there is fire. Powell also says that he believes their was a link.

Ah, your knowledge of the political history from the past 30 years seems to be truly impressing.

	09-01-2004 08:02									#7
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

TCO, your jokes are even less funny than MrFun's. PLEASE leave the humor to the experts (Laz and Stfeu.)

	09-01-2004 08:03									#8
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Laz is too loquacious. And stefu never laughs at mine.

The Brain was the funny one. Him and Gregor.

	09-01-2004 08:07									#9
	Increase the size of your Attachments

TCO, you really think that your trolls have any humorous value? They're worse than Comrade Tassadar's.

	09-01-2004 08:15									#10
	Get a bigger avatar today!

they make me happy...

	09-01-2004 08:32									#12
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

TCO - The Complete Offender

	09-01-2004 08:33									#13
	Get a bigger avatar today!

I still love you and your in-your-face comedic stylings, GP.

	09-01-2004 08:35									#14
	Increase Your PM Length

Go! Go!
TCO!

	09-01-2004 08:41									#15
	Put an end to popups!

*stops crying*

	09-01-2004 08:52									#16
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by VJ Ah, your knowledge of the political history from the past 30 years seems to be truly impressing.

I really didn't expect anyone to get that reference!

	09-01-2004 09:01									#17
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Plato:
If I may ask, what are your feelings that, as an American supportive of Bush, your people have been willingly lied to, in order to manipulate them into supporting a war they maight otherwise have not supported?

	09-01-2004 09:01									#18
	Increase Your PM Length

Is it any surprise that a member of a faith-based administration still believes, even while acknowledging that there's no evidence to support the belief?

	09-01-2004 09:15									#19
	Inflate your Upload Space

That is the problem, I don't think he lied as much as he was just wrong. And even though he was wrong it wasn't all that bad of a mistake because as Powell said the intelligence agencies were confident. US intelligence isn't the first agency to make wrong assesments and give bad advice, and Bush isn't the first world leader to trust in an intelligence agency and be led astray. I think alot of people don't understand how extremely difficult intel work is.

But Bush opponents have to make a decision. Either he is a stupid country bumkin who has no idea what is going on or he is an evil genius conspirator behind the curtain, running a worldwide corporate takeover. You can't have both, they are mutually exclusive. Of course the true answer is neither.

I also like how for every critisism apparantly that is the PRIMARY reason. They can't all be primary, and if you insist he made multiple mistakes then you admit there were multiple reasons for going in, not JUST for oil or JUST for WMD. So I will admit of the host of reasons that were given, and there were alot of them even if you only bothered to listen to the ones you didn't like, some have turned out to be wrong or mistaken or overexagerated in hindsight (and lets remember that Monday morning quarterbacks) most have not.

	09-01-2004 09:18									#20
	Increase the size of your Attachments

quote: Originally posted by Patroklos That is the problem, I don't think he lied as much as he was just wrong. And even though he was wrong it wasn't all that bad of a mistake because as Powell said the intelligence agencies were confident.

NOT AS BAD! MORE THAN TEN THOUSAND PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE OF YOUR WRONG INTELLIGENCE AND THAT'S "NOT THAT BAD"!

Oh well, next time let's slaughter the whole of Jordania. Even if we're not completely sure, the intelligence is confident, so it won't be that bad

	09-01-2004 09:19									#21
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by Spiffor Plato: If I may ask, what are your feelings that, as an American supportive of Bush, your people have been willingly lied to, in order to manipulate them into supporting a war they maight otherwise have not supported?

Well the whole situation is bad. I feel like the President had decided that the face of the Middle East must change for their to be real security in America. Something had to be done that hadn't been done before. Diplomacy had more than obviously failed. The solution, to him I believe, was o build an international consensus to do this. He vastly overestimated how far the post 9/11 international support would go. Once the French formed the new triumvirate to oppose US pre-emtion doctrine I feel he felt backed into a corner. The WMD issue was the only one that had the force of international law (Obviously an interpretation of UN resolution 1441). He had no choice but to press this issue internationally. Domestically, the European resistence raised questions to the new policy that otherwise may not have been raised (sure there would have been opposition anyway...it is a matter of scale). In order to deal with this he felt compelled to try to tie this issue to the terrorist issue. Perhaps there are indications of the link, but certainly not the hard evidence that one would want.

Given these two situations, Bush stretched beyond the evidence in the name of support. This he should not have done.

I believe that the policy we are pursuing is sound. The dividends are being seen in Libya and possibly DPRK. Iraqi democracy will come to pass eventually and Iranian dissidents are energized. Bush should have stated exactly why we needed to be there.

My support for the politics of Bush continues even if my dissapointment in the procedure is growing.

Did that answer the question or was I rambling?

	09-01-2004 09:21									#22
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Actually, more accurately, more than ten thousand people did not die because of your faulty intelligence, but because the US and the UK wanted to wage this war so badly they forged intelligence. The forgery was blatant in the UK. In the US, mouths get opened since a few months, and denounce a climate where the intelligence agencies were asked to charge Iraq, rather than to make reports reflecting reality.

	09-01-2004 09:24									#23
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Thanks Plato, for your answer seems sincere, and that's sincerity we need in these times.

If I compress it a bit, you end up saying you favor the realpolitical motives for the war, and that you consider the manipulation of intelligence (and thus of your fellow Americans) as a necessary evil to reach that goal. But what an evil.

	09-01-2004 09:24									#24
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by Spiffor NOT AS BAD! MORE THAN TEN THOUSAND PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE OF YOUR WRONG INTELLIGENCE AND THAT'S "NOT THAT BAD"! Oh well, next time let's slaughter the whole of Jordania. Even if we're not completely sure, the intelligence is confident, so it won't be that bad

Spiffor! Really now! How many people were found in Iraqi mass graves? Give me a break!! You have points on other issues, but the net loss of life in Iraq is surely less then it would have been with continued Saddam rule.

	09-01-2004 09:25									#25
	Inflate your Upload Space

That would be your opinion, usupported by fact. You may have .5% of the UK/US retired intelligence community in decent, but then again the majority are perfectly happy staying at their jobs and supporting what is going on.

The fact is niether you or I have any idea what is going on on that front in any real sence, and this constant assumption that everyone is coprrupt lieing devils is very boring and tiresome.

	09-01-2004 09:26									#26
	Got spare money?

quote: Originally posted by Spiffor Thanks Plato, for your answer seems sincere, and that's sincerity we need in these times. If I compress it a bit, you end up saying you favor the realpolitical motives for the war, and that you consider the manipulation of intelligence (and thus of your fellow Americans) as a necessary evil to reach that goal. But what an evil.

No I don't favor manipulation of intelligence. I think he should have plainly said that we didn't know for sure, but we were going anyway because it was the right thing to do.

	09-01-2004 09:33									#27
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: Originally posted by PLATO Spiffor! Really now! How many people were found in Iraqi mass graves? Give me a break!! You have points on other issues, but the net loss of life in Iraq is surely less then it would have been with continued Saddam rule.

1. These figures come from a seemingly serious source quoted by Lord Of The Mark. They figure the estimated amount of dead Iraqi soldiers, among other victims. For these guys are people too. And when hundreds of tanks get wasted, and when barracks get levelled by cruise missiles, it's not hard to figure there have been quite a few dead anyways.

2. It's most probably true that the death toll would have been worse if Saddam's family had been remaining in power. This is actually the only valid reason to support the war IMHO (and IIRC, only Laz was consistent he solely supported the war based on these grounds).
Yet, starting a war is great responsibility. When I read that it's "not that bad" that doubtful intelligence started a whole war, I think that some people have completely forgotten what responsibility a declaration of war is. I find it particularily frightening coming from someone in the military. I mean, these people are supposed to know better than others that war is hell.

If I kill your daughter, and then I say later it's "not that bad, because I trusted my hunch she was dangerous", how would you react? Badly I assume (I hope). Well, here is exactly the same.

The "oops" argument can not, may not be tolerated.

	09-01-2004 09:35									#28
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

I have a very realpolitik way of looking at things which is plainly obvious, but people are simply wrong in realpolitik too.

Why is that in politics everyone has to have been involved in some sort of elaborate sceme that blew up?

	09-01-2004 09:38									#29
	Suffering from ads?

Not quite Spiffor. If I killed your daughter because she was running around with a gun (which turned out to not be loaded but how did I know that), killing the rest of your family in torterous ways I would feel totally justified. Because thoough I was wring about the gun, I was right about the killing her own.

Intelligence only failed us in certain areas. And intelligence is a human construct and thus will be wrong. Nobody should say "oh well," but you have to understand things like this are a reality of statecraft, and heads would sure as hell role in the CIA, and I am sure they did.

	09-01-2004 09:41									#30
	Increase Your PM Length

quote: Originally posted by Patroklos this constant assumption that everyone is coprrupt lieing devils is very boring and tiresome.

Of course, this assumption is wholly unreasonable when talking about realpolitik .

I still fail to see how come the intelligence could have been adamant there was a proof (as Powell told the UN) of the ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, now that we know there is no proof? What could we possibly learn this year that invalidates previous proof? How could we learn that the accusatory taped conversations were just pranks? How could we learn that the blatant missile platforms have never been there? Surely, the satellites must have had a glitch and just happened to make sand look like convincing missile platforms.

Really, I would have thought that the capture of Saddam's palace would have brought many revelations. But how could they bring "unrevelations"?