 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
Some are, some aren't. Many left-wing and right-wing people see freedom and the ability to do what you want to do as more important than democracy. As long as people aren't hurting others, they should not be contrained, type of thing.
quote: Originally posted by Park Avenue
1) They don't support the establishment of a democracy in the Middle East. They'd rather we left Iraq alone. |
Most, if not every, left-wing person I know supports democracy in the Middle East. They just don't think it gives us a right to go to war with them for it.
quote: Originally posted by Park Avenue
2) Whenever a right-wing group is voted in, the talk is about how "dangerous" or "scary" their policies are, such as the spread of democracy. They don't seem able to accept the result of an election in which "their side" lost. |
If you mean far right, as in the shock when Le Pen did so well in the French elections, then yes. People voting for a racist is quite scary, IMHO. It doesn't mean they can't take that they lost, it just means they think what the population did was extremely stupid.
quote: Originally posted by Park Avenue
3) The majority are against such things as gay marriage or gay adoption, yet the left want to force these things through anyway. |
Who gives those people the right to say that someone can't do something that has nothing to do with them?
It's not about the left not believing in democracy, it's that it is not a holy policy that must at all times be followed exactly. If most people are against gay marriage and adoption (depends which country you're citing) then you still have the question of whether someone else should be able to decide what a person does, when it has nothing to do with them.
I believe in democracy in that I think we should elect our rulers. I don't believe in democracy in that I think once elected, let them do their job, and if you don't like it, elect someone else.
Ask yourself this, if 51% of the population want one thing, but are not really affected that much by it, and 49% of the population would lose out horribly if it did happen, what should happen? For example, if the majority wanted a law that said that people of a certain ethnicity could be beaten up at will. IMHO, some things are more important than democracy, such as the effects of that decision. When democracy takes into account that strength of that persons views on the matters, and when the vast majority of people can understand the issues and make an informed judgement, then I'll believe democracy doesn't need contraints in the way it does now. However many people vote on whims or prejudices, without being able to understand the effects of each option. And many people believe very strongly in an issue, and would be affected greatly by it, but someone who it will not affect gets the same say. IMHO, it's not for someone to tell a gay couple that they can't adopt. As long as they want to, and the mother is happy with it, it isn't the business of the population as a whole.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
If we can get a majority of participants in this thread voting that Spink repeatedly slams his tackle in a car door, will he stand by his principles? |
Aye.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:33
|
|
Well, that was a completely bizarre DP...
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 22-01-2004 at 19:46
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|