 |
|  |
 |
|
curtsibling
|
 |
of the Kill!
May 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Elok
Lack of proof is useless when you're dealing with the concept of a theoretically omnipotent and omniscient being. You can't possibly second-guess someone whose motives you'll never understand. There's no absolute proof of God either. Believe or not. |
We could also apply your rant here to the easter bunny, santa or a giant cosmic cucumber.
Because they are not any more unfeasible than the deity you have chosen to support.
And your attempts to sound high and mighty also come to naught, sir.
You are merely guessing, using fabricated fantasy to address some great
macro-being you hold up as a reason to egotise over whomever you imagine as heretics.
quote: Originally posted by Elok Faith in an uncertainty is useful for salvation for many reasons, not least of which is that it encourages one to stop assuming one is the arbiter and judge of all truth, and thereby unclouds the eye of the soul. |
Stop and read what you are saying.
I may as well try and convince you that Star Wars or Lord of the Rings is real, because that is how your grim intonements 'soul' and 'judge of all truth' sound to me.
Are you trying to convince me of something or are you really trying to sell me these fanciful ideas?
OK, prove there is a soul, and not a chemical mix in humanity.
Then come back and try hitting me with the sermon.
quote: Originally posted by Elok And don't give me the usual jibber-jabber about primitive superstition and the triumph of science. Science is the investigation of natural phenomena. It has little if anything to do with the supernatural. The confusion of religion and science in the past is not an error commited by me in the present, AFAIK. Feel free to accuse others of "creation science" (Maybe you weren't even going to mention that to me, in which case my apologies. I was just trying to head off a rant before it happened). |
Ehm.
Yes, well your rant has taken full bloom. 
You are right, science is indeed the trial and error testing and subsequent inscription of all around us.
I am unsure of what you are trying to tell me here, but you are hideously off-topic, by any means.
quote: Originally posted by Elok And if we do not die as frequently, our own spite and evil will merely drive us to living hell. I'll have to ask Ben, but I believe That Hideous Strength addressed the subject of eugenics/transhumanism at length. |
Good for him.
But it matters not if it offends you, me or anyone, selective genetics and that it entails will eventually happen.
And the 'elites' of our society will take precedence, while the massed flock will be short lived.
I can imagine most religionists accepting that, as the use of science is an 'abomination' after all.
Now, I have indulged you.
Please stop dragging this off-topic.
Cheers!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
I would go insane and denounce all meaning in life, my hygiene would decline significantly and I'd become rude and abrupt w/ ppl I met on the street.
after a sufficient amount of self pity and woe I would turn to a life of crime.
u?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
I have another question for religious people.
During the Holocaust there was a case of a group of Jews who led by their Rabbi decided to put God on trial. I think he/she/it was found guilty.
So my question is two fold.
Do you think this is within the faith, to put God on trial?
Would your religious beliefs be challanged if you were put into a concentration camp?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
So God is not infallible?
Does it not strip God of his authority if he/she/it is put on trial and found guilty?
This must effectively be the same as saying that God does not exist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
So God is not infallible?
Does it not strip God of his authority if he/she/it is put on trial and found guilty?
This must effectively be the same as saying that God does not exist. |
who says god has to be infallible??? stop acting like a fundie!!!!
a court holds according to its authority, not for all time
A court of jews putting G-d on trial(and could you provide a link please) , is not making a theological argument, or even claiming to prove god fallible by absolute criteria. They are saying that as far as THEY are concerned, judging as humans but using the principles G-d gave us, they cannot exonerate G-d.
The bible, an old book and yet a new one, says "shall not the judge of the earth do justice???" and also "where were you when I created Heaven and earth"
On the one hand, it IS appropriate for man to apply concepts of justice to G-d, and to do so harshly if necessary. On the other hand, G-d is radically other than man, and cannot be judged in ways appropriate to human beings. This, of course, is a contradiction. In wrestling with the contradiction, you MAY learn something about the eternal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Ok so God was found guilty, put in jail, and now he is out on parole?
IŽll be watching him closely.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|