 |
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
I disagree with the findings on the fact that homosexuality is something people lie about. So you can't get a good cross section of gays because some will remain in the closet and some people who claim to be straight mught be gay.
I disagree because from your information, you don't give the cause of the stress and drug use. You seem to say that the homosexuality is the cause and the effect is drugs and stress. I say societies unacceptance causes the drugs and stress. That is to say that I as a black man feel more stress than the average white person, am more likely to do drugs, commit a crime, contract an STD and die younger. Not because I am black but because I am not totally accepted by society. That is my firm belief and I would like to change that so that people will not feel stressed to walk down the street.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: An unjust law should be resisted and railed against until it is changed. Yes, it is up to people to decide which laws are unjust and to peacefully agitate for change. |
So was it ok for Judge Moore to place those 10 Commandments in the SC building? He obviously believed it was an unjust law which prevented him from doing so.
I'd like to the see people first try to change the law through the law (ie, court), rather than decide just to violate it without going to the courts. |
The judge is right to resist a law he sees as unjust. He may fail, but he is right to follow his conscience so long as he does not interfere with others.
On this topic, people have been trying to change the laws through the law for years. How much longer will it take? There comes a time where it is right to resort to civil disobedience in the face of habitual injustice. If the representatives of a fair sized city choose to pick up the cause, huzzah! That must mean that justice is closer to being served.
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
But is the current law unjust? How are homosexuals restricted from loving their partners under the current regime?
Then the people must have a say, and not the courts. The issue must come to a vote. |
You'd do well arguing for slavery or apartheid along these lines, at least until your views were in the minority of recognised electors. What then, Ben? Will you accept organised religions being banned when the majority become atheists and are good and tired of religious behaviour that they see as immoral?
All you are arguing for is mob rule, human rights and the rights of minorities be damned.
quote: 5. Ben people love who they love. Allowing gays to marry is showing that you believe in the founding fathers vision. It's saying that you respect other people opinion.
6. One of the issues that black americans had during WW1, WW2, Korea, and Vietnam is what am I fighting or again? Our politicians talk about freedom. Let's stop talking about and start being about it. |
More 's, even though Ben and I are not Yanks. 
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
I sincerely doubt the founding fathers would sanction homosexual marriage. I believe their thoughts would be closer along the lines of 'perversion.' |
Let's cut to the chase.
Are these your thoughts, Ben?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Thanks Boris,
Ben one last question. Why are you so against gays. Did you yourself have any homosexual tendencies and was cured through Christianity?
This is a seroius question. I have a friend who tried that route. He ended up having two kids, joininng, the choir, and becoming a deacon in his church before he left his wife for a man.
He told me that he almost committed suicide because he felt that he had let god down. He knew he let Mom, Dad, Brothers, Sisters, Wife and kids down.
That's him.
What about you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Boris where did you get that first pic from. I think I know one of those sinners. Really.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
I hope Ben does not think I was trying to insult him with my question. Some people would be, that's why I said I was serious. Ben, if you are insulted I apologize.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
quote:
Your ideal. Are you suggesting that the US government should impose that ideal on all couples? That so we can reach that ideal, everyone must marry and have children.
|
No. Not everyone is supposed to marry. Those who want to marry should try to live up to the ideal, but the funny thing is that none of us do.
So the real value comes not from falling short, but in trying to live up to the ideal.
And, no, it is not mine. I can't claim credit for the idea is far older than me.
quote:
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not life, liberty, and only the pursuit of Ben Kenobi's ideal of happiness.
|
But the government is not barring anyone from being happy.
quote:
Also, you are still ignoring the fact that whether or not a gay couple have children has nothing to do with whether or not they are married.
|
Why does your fact matter? Regardless of whether they are recognised as married or not, you cannot fill that other gender that you lack.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:34
|
|
The Governator steps in...
quote:
Schwarzenegger Seeks Stop to Gay Unions
Email this Story
Feb 21, 12:12 AM (ET)
By BETH FOUHY
BURLINGAME, Calif. (AP) - After a judge Friday declined to put an immediate end to same-sex marriages in San Francisco, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger ordered California's attorney general Friday to "take immediate steps" to get a court ruling to make the city stop.
Schwarzenegger's directive to Attorney General Bill Lockyer was prompted in part by the judge's decision not to impose a temporary restraining order that would have halted San Francisco's weeklong parade of 3,175 same-sex weddings, said Rob Stutzman, Schwarzenegger's communications director.
"Our civilized society and legal system is based upon a respect for and adherence to the rule of law," Schwarzenegger wrote in a letter to Lockyer. "The City and County of San Francisco's unfortunate choice to disregard state law and grant marriage certificates to gay couples directly undermines this fundamental guarantee."
The Republican governor "feels that we've come to a point where we're starting down a dangerous path and it leads to anarchy at some point," Stutzman said. "It's time for this to end."
Lockyer, an elected Democrat who is a potential candidate in the 2006 governor's race, has said he plans to vigorously defend state laws barring gay marriage.
Judge Ronald Evans Quidachay denied the Campaign for California Families' request for a temporary restraining order Friday, saying conservative groups failed to prove same-sex weddings would cause irreparable harm. In a separate case, another judge declined to order an immediate stop to the marriages Tuesday.
The conservative group argued that the weddings harmed all the Californians who voted in 2000 for Proposition 22, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman.
The judge suggested that the rights of the gay and lesbian couples appeared to be more substantial.
"If the court has to weigh rights here, on the one hand you are talking about voting rights, and on the other you are talking about equal rights," Quidachay said.
Quidachay consolidated the Campaign for California Families' lawsuit against the city with one filed by another conservative group, and told lawyers for both sides to work out between themselves when the next hearing would be held.
Peter Ragone, spokesman for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, scoffed at Schwarzenegger's directive.
"The truth is, thousands of people are involved in loving relationships and having them recognized for the first time," Ragone said. "We urge the governor to meet with some of the couples because what's happening is both lawful and loving."
Mathew Staver, a lawyer representing the Campaign for California Families, said he believes the court ultimately will find that Newsom acted illegally when he began allowing gay marriages last week.
"He can't decide to grant same-sex marriage licenses any more than he can declare war against a foreign country," Staver said.
But chief deputy city attorney Therese Stewart said the failure of conservative opponents to win emergency injunctions demonstrates that the city has a strong case.
"Both judges really recognized there is nobody who is hurt by allowing gay people to marry," Stewart said.
Newsom remained defiant before the ruling, officiating at the wedding of one of California's most prominent lesbian politicians inside his offices at City Hall.
A crowd of politicians and lawyers celebrated that wedding as other gays and lesbians prepared to join the more than 3,000 same-sex couples allowed to marry so far.
About 25 anti-gay-marriage protesters later blocked the door of the county clerk's office, lying down in front of the line and singing religious songs. Gays and lesbians responded by belting out "The Star-Spangled Banner" until sheriff's deputies escorted the protesters out. No arrests were made.
Most Americans remain opposed to same-sex marriages. A poll out Friday indicated that 50 percent of Californians remain opposed, but that sympathy for allowing gays and lesbians to marry has risen by 6 percentage points over the last four years, to 44 percent.
In the San Francisco Bay area, 58 percent of all respondents support gay marriage, according to the Public Policy Institute of California poll, which was based on a statewide survey taken Feb. 8-16 and has a margin of error of 2 percentage points.
While defending its new marriage policy in court, the city also is suing the state, challenging its gay-marriage ban. The city contends the ban violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution.
---
Associated Press writer Lisa Leff in San Francisco contributed to this story.
|
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040221/D80REHL00.html
Pretty brave of him, all things considered.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|