Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-General > Patch 1.20
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread   
Pages (8): [ <<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
player1 is offline player1
King
Belgrade, YU
Sep 2001
time: 06:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 01:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#121 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

You know, Jesse comment just shows that they did tried to fix sub bug, but it showed to be a little bit complicated.

It would take too much time to be put in this patch.
If they focused more on fixing this, I bet we won't see a patch till April or later.

But, since there will be a patch after 1.20 we know they'll try to fix that bug later.


I just don't understand all that bashing.
They did tied to fix sub-bug.
Really, that tried.
But, it was too much time consuming to be fixed with this patch.

JimMac is offline JimMac
Warlord
Belfast, N.Ireland
Mar 1999
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 01:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#122 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by player1
You know, Jesse comment just shows that they did tried to fix sub bug, but it showed to be a little bit complicated....

But, since there will be a patch after 1.20 we know they'll try to fix that bug later.

I just don't understand all that bashing.
.


I generally agree, but I think Jesse could changing the 'bashing tone' of this thread if he was clearer about what is going to happen after 1.20.

IIRC the plan was for monthly beta patches leading to a final patch in June. Jesse was quite enthusiastic about new aspects such as the worker gangs and the proposed new combat system. Then we hear about some major changes in Atari (was it the Q.A. function? I can't remember), Jesse goes quiet and it seems the whole deal is off!

If Jesse was to post something like:

'Listen guys, this 1.20 patch IS simply the official version of the 1.15b, plus a few additions. I promise that I will be getting right on to fixing the sub bug and all the other issues that Alexman and Doc have listed, and I promise that they willl be fixed in forthcoming patches. Thanks for all the feedback" etc

Then I for one would br ready to place my order for CivIV.

But Jesse's actual comments:

"the next steps can be taken.... We need to be focused on Civ IV...there's little to be done about it besides apologizing. I'm not saying a new patch isn't coming, but we are at a crucial point in CIV and need to stay focused.

sounds to me like "we're working on CivIV but if I get a chance I will see what I can do for you all"

Jarred is offline Jarred
Settler

Dec 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 02:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#123 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

It is April almost, so we won't see this patch until April anyway.

Jaybe is offline Jaybe

King
Las Vegas, NV USA
Sep 2001
time: 21:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 02:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#124 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
... if he was clearer about what is going to happen after 1.20.

He probably didn't clarify it because he is not sure that it will happen, though he has intentions, hopes and plans.
It is possible that he knows it will not.

planetfall is offline planetfall
Prince
Incoming from CO
Jan 2002
time: 22:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 02:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#125 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Unless I miss read, I am disappointed the turns-to-research prompt under SGA is not fixed.

I have learned to adjust, but it is annoying.

PF

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#126 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I think this thread is beginning wax dribble with sprinkles of babbles midst meloncholly whinning... ...unfortunately for credible reasons...

So therefor I would repost here an adroit quote:

to wit...
quote:
by Antrine... 'I think after this, a lot us here should check ourselves in at the 'positive thinking' clinic for needed therapy'.


Therapy classes are on a first come first bash basis.

Oh that darn 'writing on the wall'

On another note, I've been a wandering lately, anyone like EUII with patch 1.07? I found it for eleven bucks, thinking about trying it out.

ErikM is offline ErikM
Warlord

Nov 2003
time: 00:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#127 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

1.05 is better for starters.
If you do 1.07, download the betas from the Paradox site. 1.07 is rather annoying without beta patches due to endless revolts.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#128 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Many thanks ErikM! Inside info is always good place to start.

planetfall is offline planetfall
Prince
Incoming from CO
Jan 2002
time: 22:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#129 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

sub bug is nothing. Just remove invisible from subs.

Now AI not building armies, that is significant.

PF

alexman is offline alexman
Emperor
Hunt Valley, MD
Jan 1970
time: 00:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:49 Visit alexman's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#130 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

No problem, just remove "Army" property from Armies.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 03:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#131 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
by planetfall... Now AI not building armies, that is significant.


Gee, just refer to my thread AI army really!! http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...threadid=109636

This will secure you a working knowledge ( work-a-around ) of how to see, engage and otherwise 'experience' an AI Army in the field, filled with useful units.


perhaps Firaxis should bring me on as a consultant!

Tell me truly what would rather have? A long table of work-a-rounds like unto this or an official credible patch? Hey, you decide, the list is getting longer...

P.S. Alexman I move aside to work behind this obvious genius.

Mad Bomber is offline Mad Bomber
King
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 2002
time: 00:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 04:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#132 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by player1


Well, it's made to be 2 techs to give Frigates some chance in the game. And not to be never to be used unit by players.

I'm satisifed by that.


I find it absurd that I can build Modern ships without the Ironclad tech. I don't mind that Ironclads need an additional tech, so long as Ironclads are required to build Destroyers, Cruisers, Subs, and Battleships (perhaps require an additional tech after Ironclads in addition to combustion to build these?)

Fried-Psitalon is offline Fried-Psitalon
Prince
Not just another pretty face.
Dec 2002
time: 00:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 04:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#133 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

I believe Jesse posted somewhere that Civ4 was written with a new engine specifically to help deal with the issues mentioned here?

Cort Haus is offline Cort Haus
Emperor
London
Apr 2002
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 18:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#134 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

The big deal here is the detatchment of Mot Trans from the Electronics branch and the removal of Radio. This will help break the auto ToE-Hoover 2-step as the best tech strat for the industrial era. Before you could only get bombers from the mid-branch alone, but now you get Tanks too. ToE techs can now be used for a miltary beeline.

hexagonian is offline hexagonian
King
Gnawing on your mind...
Jun 1999
time: 23:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 19:50 Visit hexagonian's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#135 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by asleepathewheel
Has paradox ever released a game even as complete as C3C? Every game of theirs I've played required at least 6 months or patching before some manual features worked at all.

As an aside, C3C is the third incarnation of the civ3 engine and the upgrades are not substanially different than the initial release (with the exception of the addition of MP). Most of the upgrades (for instance, a more complete editor springs to mind) should have been part of the initial release.

Basically, Firaxis has charged customers for 2 patches - and it has taken 2 years to make civ3 playable - as opposed to the 6 months for EU2.

And Paradox upgrades EU2 without charging the customer...

I'll take Paradox's committment level to their games over Firaxis's committment level any day.

vmxa1 is offline vmxa1
Deity
Oviedo, Fl
Nov 2001
time: 21:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 21:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#136 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Well commitment is good, but look at Galciv and Starships Unlimited. You can't beat them for working on the game, but it does not make me want to play them all that much.

I appreciate what they have done and I am glad I bought the games, but I play Civ instead.

ducki is offline ducki
King

Sep 2002
time: 23:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 22:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#137 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by Antrine
Gee, just refer to my thread AI army really!! http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...threadid=109636

This will secure you a working knowledge ( work-a-around ) of how to see, engage and otherwise 'experience' an AI Army in the field, filled with useful units.

Come on, Antrine.
You modded the palace to spit out Armies like SoZ spits out Ancient Cav. No reason to continue being misleading about it, especially with so many folks wanting a "real" fix for this.
Besides, what if Jesse just scans the posts/subject lines. Sees yours about an AI army in the field and thinks "Oh, well, good. We can cross that off," without actually reading how you did it? It's not that likely, but if enough folks don't actually read your post and just take your word for it and stop complaining about it, is it possible it slips further down the priority list for Jesse?
quote:

Tell me truly what would rather have? A long table of work-a-rounds like unto this or an official credible patch? Hey, you decide, the list is getting longer...

Speaking of "credible"...

Hehehe. Just pokin' fun a bit, Antrine. A bit of "pot, kettle, black" in there made me giggle a bit.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 18-03-2004 23:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#138 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

'misleading' ?
I surely hope not! sarcastic yes!

Pokin fun in a now depressing scenario. I confess.

Leading the unwary along, who do not read?

Gosh darn ducki I SURE hope I have not so easily misled Firaxis and on account my antics 'they' bypass fixing the Army delimma.

Perhaps I include more 'disclosures' in my posts?

However, today I think I will let 'others' spell it out. Thanks

I have only presented myself one way ( a modder who worships the great big editor in the sky ). Anyway many blessings and let us collectively have mercy on the future of our game.



P.S. the creation forum is nearly dead however, I hope to move back to the graveyard soon.

Jarred is offline Jarred
Settler

Dec 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 09:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#139 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Since Great Leaders don't build improvements anymore, why not for the AI make Amries instead of great leaders?

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 11:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#140 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Great idea! Jarred. However...

This and many 'other' great ideas require so-called hard-coding for to be implemented. That means we continue petitioning the gods up at Firaxis for these favors.

Again, though we have been ( ...and I say apparently ) left naked on the 'windy' side of the temple, like old lovers. As new loves are pursued. ( CIV 4 )

Rellin is offline Rellin
Chieftain
Chicago, Illinois
Jan 2004
time: 05:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 12:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#141 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
With such sweeping personnel change at Firaxis, is it reasonable to expect that Civ4 will be a cheap knockoff of Civ3, much in the same way that Call to Power tried to imitate Civ2 but failed miserably?


Scary thought, but sadly enough probably going to be correct.

AK47 is offline AK47
Chieftain
Tervuren - Belgium
Nov 2003
time: 06:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 16:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#142 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

I already brought this up at CFC, but 1.20 patch doesn't seem to be taking care of it (the description I read of it), so:

Hidden Nationality land units bug. Although a HUMAN player can not attack and capture cities with them (unless declaring war), the AI can, and greatly abuses this. For me it's no problem, I can handle it, but the other AIs have no clue how to deal with it.

And also, the continuing sub bug really annoys me.
(a general Invisible units bug)

I'd really like to see both of them fixed at some stage.
AK.

Last edited by AK47 on 19-03-2004 at 16:38

Spiffor is offline Spiffor
Emperor
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 18:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#143 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by Antrine
This and many 'other' great ideas require so-called hard-coding for to be implemented. That means we continue petitioning the gods up at Firaxis for these favors.

Not quite. You can do a little tweak in the editor, and have armies created in battle, instead of a leader (general settings). The AI is supposed to know what to do when it has un army under its control.

Edit: however, maybe this tweak would prevent scientific leaders from appearing. I don't know, it needs to be tested.

alexman is offline alexman
Emperor
Hunt Valley, MD
Jan 1970
time: 00:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 18:42 Visit alexman's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#144 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:

However, maybe this tweak would prevent scientific leaders from appearing. I don't know, it needs to be tested.

It would not prevent scientific leaders from appearing, but it would prevent Armies from appearing if you already have an Army in the field. Tested and verified.

Still, better than how it is now, IMO.

Last edited by alexman on 19-03-2004 at 20:16

planetfall is offline planetfall
Prince
Incoming from CO
Jan 2002
time: 22:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 20:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#145 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

F3 crash bug
Any idea if this bug was fixed in 1.20? With 1.15 I'm experiencing crashes about 3..5 times a game.

PF

DrSpike is offline DrSpike
Deity
Enthusiastic member of Apolyton
Sep 2001
time: 05:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 20:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#146 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Never seen it.

planetfall is offline planetfall
Prince
Incoming from CO
Jan 2002
time: 22:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 20:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#147 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Doc,

It happens late in game with lots of units/cities. When you press the F3 key and have ability to see other civs military, the game crashes about 1/50 turns. Not windows, just the game. Does not seem to have any correlation with frequency of windows reboot. This is on WinXP. Others have reported the problem and is listed as a bug over at cfan.

PF

player1 is offline player1
King
Belgrade, YU
Sep 2001
time: 06:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 21:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#148 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Who knows?

Maybe when Firaxis tweaked rules for scientific leader, maybe army creation bug got fixed too.

vmxa1 is offline vmxa1
Deity
Oviedo, Fl
Nov 2001
time: 21:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 21:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#149 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

planetfall do you have to have a spy for it to happen? I have not seen it, but I have not had a spy either with 1.15.

planetfall is offline planetfall
Prince
Incoming from CO
Jan 2002
time: 22:34
  Old Post 19-03-2004 21:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#150 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

VMXA1,

I think having a spy increases frequency. What is annoying is I have not retrained me yet. I like to:
-- play round
-- see new count of AI military after my action
-- save game
-- go to next round

Unfortunately I too often forget I need to save BEFORE hitting F3. Usually I am trying to see change in number of bombers||infantry||tanks||AC||BS.

It has happened before I had spies in AI civs, but does increase with active spies.

PF

 
Pages (8): [ <<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34.
Apolyton Time is 00:34.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0520 seconds (90.29% PHP - 9.71% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net