 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
That was very insulting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
But I expected no better from a supporter of BUSH.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
PLATO

|
 |
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
If we buy the oft repeated "AQ hates us for our freedom", then any time a people get to elect their new leaders freely and a peaceful transfer of power occurs, AQ has lost. Will now the people who repeat this most often stop saying it? Or do they trully believe it?
|
Hey Gepap! Good to see you join this debate.
I am decrying the free choice of people to elect their government. It does not matter if it is socialist or conservative as long as it is freely elected. The problem I have is the undue influence that a terrorist attack may have had on this election. With polls showing the government leading a week ago and now the vote going the other way then one has to raise the question about this being a possible influence. If it was, then was this election truly free? This is my point.
quote: Plato: those that sold the war on Iraq sold it a a short term action-an immidiate cure to an immidiate problem -remmber all the flack given to Dean for saying we werew not a lick safer having caught Saddam? Well, to the people of Spain, this has come to shown true- Iraq is a very long term part of the possible solution to the war on terror, which will not yield benefits for at leasta decade in that regard. It was not sold that way though-and those that sold the war on false premises should see the consequences of their claims. |
While I did believe the WMD bullsh1t, I hope that you remember that my main argument was changing the power structures in the ME. This I believe is essential. I think that 10 years may be about right, but where would the ME be in 10 years if its course had continued unchecked. Terrorism did not spring up overnight. It has been coming for 30 to 50 years. Its defeat may well take as long. There does, however, have to be a first step. Hopefully we have taken the right ones. I believe that we have wrt Afghanistan and Iraq, but truly, only time will tell.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
The Spanish result is actually a huge victory for the battle against terrorism. For a safer (bush free) world and for the European Union. I hear the socialists are much more pro Europe than their predecessors.
How this unconviences the bush regime leaves me completely impassive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
This is a definite victory for Al-Qaeda. Their terror attack has succeded at getting a government much less friendly to the US and removed a key ally. |
Only if you beleive the 'who is not with us is against us' BS, you could possibly think this is an al-Qaeda victory.
And you might finally start to rethink your key-ally wasn't so KEY, as the spanish people have told the US a year ago with the massive demonstrations in the streets of Madrid (yes, the very same streets that you have seen over the last couple of days)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Odd
|
|
São Paulo Brazil
Apr 2002 time: 02:34
|
|
Of course the election of the socialists was a defeat for democracy. The US government is democratic, therefore anything against it is against democracy and should be erradicated by force.
I believe we should start a seach in the socialist party for weapons of mass destruction.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|