 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO
Please explain a bit further how you think that this line of postulation would lead to the conclusions you draw. I am really curious as to the corelations that you are drawing to gain these conclusions. (Unless of course that was just a troll ) |
Well I couldn't help thinking that the Spanish people (like the British) have lived with the knowledge and the effects of terrorism for years:
'
1959
Euskadi Ta Askatasuma (Basque Homeland and Freedom) is established as Spain enters the 20th year of General Franco's fascist dictatorship.
The Basque language has been banned, its culture suppressed, and intellectuals imprisoned and tortured for their political and cultural beliefs. Eta's founders are students dissatisfied with the moderates in the existing Basque Nationalist Party, the Partido Nacionalista Vasco, or PNV.
1961
The only armed group to emerge during the Franco years, Eta attempts its first large-scale operation, the derailing of a train carrying civil war veterans travelling to San Sebastian (Donostia in Basque) to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the start of the Spanish civil war.
The attempt fails, and police respond with road controls, arrests, house searches and the widespread use of torture.
1968
The group commits its first murder. Meliton Manzanas, the San Sebastian police chief, is the victim.
1973
Eta registers its most spectacular success, assassinating Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco, the prime minister and Franco's most likely successor. The group tunnelled under the road used by the admiral on his daily route from mass, mining it and blowing his car over a four-storey building.
1974
Eta is blamed for a bomb attack on a central Madrid bar frequented by police officers. The attack kills 12 people and seriously injures 69.
1975
Franco dies, and Juan Carlos, the grandson of Spain's last ruling king, takes his place.
1978
Spain's new democratic constitution gives autonomous powers to a Basque government in the provinces of Alava, Vizcaya and Guipuzcoa, with a parliament, police force, control over education, and tax-raising powers. Eta's political wing, Herri Batasuna, is founded to press for full independence for the three provinces and neighbouring Navarre.
1979
Madrid's airport and two railway stations are the target of simultaneous bombings, causing six deaths and 130 injuries.
1980
118 people are killed in what is Eta's bloodiest year to date.
1983-87
Gal, the anti-terrorist liberation group, is set up to fight a dirty war against Eta. Its agents carry out assassinations of known Eta members (and several who were not), kidnappings, bombings and torture, killing 27 people during the 80s.
1987
21 shoppers are killed when a bomb hits a Barcelona supermarket. Eta apologises for a "mistake."
1988-95
Judge Baltasar Garzon begins to look at links between the government and Gal. It emerges that Gal groups were made up entirely of mercenaries recruited by two policemen using public funds. The prime minister, Felipe Gonzalez, denies that he authorised their actions, but the scandal taints the ailing administration.
1995
The Popular Party (PP) leader, Jose Maria Aznar, is saved from an Eta car bomb by his car's armour plating. Police foil a plot to kill Juan Carlos in Majorca.
1996
The PP defeats the Socialist Party (PSOE) in the general election, and Mr Aznar becomes prime minister.
1997
Demanding that Basque prisoners are moved closer to home, Eta kidnaps and kills a Basque councillor, Miguel Angel Blanco. Six million Spaniards demonstrate against Eta on the streets. The year ends with 23 leaders of Herri Batasuna being given seven years in jail for collaborating with Eta, the first time any members of the party have been jailed for their links to the group.
1998
Eta announces its first indefinite ceasefire. A former interior minister, Jose Barrionuevo, is jailed for ten years for his part in the Gal operation.
1999
Eta ends its ceasefire, blaming lack of progress in talks with the Spanish government.
2000
A January car bombing, that kills an army officer in Madrid, marks a return to violence.
Over the following months, one PSOE, one Basque and two PP politicians are killed in car bomb and shooting attacks in the Basque region and southern Spain; a newspaper columnist, Jose Luis de la Calle, is shot dead; and four suspected Eta members are killed when their car, loaded with arms and explosives, blows up in Bilbao.
2001
Eta announces that visitors to Spain are "legitimate targets".
2002
Bomb blasts hit several tourist resorts as an EU summit is held in Seville and a court suspends Batasuna for three years because of its suspected links with Eta
2003
An indefinite ban is imposed on Batasuna party and both the EU and US declare it a terrorist group. Twin bombs hit Benidorm and Alicante; there are further blasts in towns in northern Spain.
Suspected Eta leaders are arrested in a series of police raids in November and December. The suspected logistics chief, Ibon Fernandez Iradi, is captured in the French town of Mont-de-Marsan.
2004
In a move much denounced by Spanish politicians Eta declares a ceasefire in eastern Catalonia. The Catalan region's Socialist president, Pasqual Maragall, said it was "perverse to use death to divide the peoples of Spain". '
Governments aren't thrown out of office willy nilly because some disgruntled group of sociopaths set off bombs, or assassinate Prime Ministers, cabinet minsters or chiefs of police.
I suggest that you consider the Spanish people might have the same degree of intelligence as any other human beings and might act not in reply to a chance event, but with discretion and with their political wits about them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
Ehrrrmm...
Not so easy, as the US would ALSO have to pay its due's, AND it would have to place peace-keepers under UN command, just like the rest of the world would do.
NO,no, Agathon, it's not THAT easy to do...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
It would have plenty of teeth in this case. The UN is only as strong as its member states.
The Europeans, for their own reasons, want to engender multilateralism. That means making the UN look good.
It's in the interest of the US to spread the load, it is not in their interest just to walk away. The US itself is in the position to put a large number of "teeth" behind the UN.
But as long as the necon fantasy that the US can actually run the world unilaterally holds sway in Washington this won't happen. And it's a pity, since it reduces American influence in the world and does not play to the country's strength.
I don't admire Bush senior that much, but in my view he showed himself to be a master politician with respect to the first Gulf war. He managed to get his own way and get almost everyone on side - AND it cost him almost nothing, since others paid for the war.
Wake up and smell the coffee. If you really want to stop terrorism, you don't use that as an excuse to settle old scores and accrue power to yourself. The Iraq thing was a mistake and will haunt international politics for years to come.
It boils down to:
1. The US gains little but grief for its one sided stance with regard to Israel and Palestine.
2. The US gains little but grief by being excessively unilateralist.
3. The US gains little but grief for its two faced attitude towards Arab tyranny.
4. Certain groups in the US gain much from the above, but they are clearly not the majority. |
While you make some good points, and I'd like to see the UN succeed just as much as anybody, they have an absolutley horrible track record.
The last "successful" UN campaign that took place was in Korea.
And here, over 50 years later, the issue is still unresolved.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thorgal
|
|
Tarifa, Cádiz.
Jan 2002 time: 05:34
|
|
quote: This is the point I was hoping to see debated here. Was the election the result of the terror attacks or would these results have been obtained in any event. If they are the result of the terror attacks then surely this is a dangerous precedent. |
There has not been a significant change in the intention of vote. The Popular Party has obtained approximately the same number of votes that in the year 2000. It is only that the Spanish Socialist Party has obtained many more votes due to a higher participation in these elections.
This extra electorate is mostly left people disillusioned with the Spanish Socialist Party that does not use to vote normally, but that due to the prepotence and lies of the Popular Party, have encouraged themselves to vote.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|