 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
For once, Ned is right.
The end is nigh.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
No I mean the massacre of the Byzantines inhabiting Constantinople when it fell in the 15th century. |
Some were killed, some were not- a Venetian eye-witness (Barbaro) said that quarters of the city that voluntarily submitted to the Turks avoided death:
'According to Islamic tradition the Sultan, before the beginning of hostilities, demanded the surrender of the city, promising to spare the lives of its inhabitants and respect their property. In a proud and dignified reply the Emperor rejected Mehmed's demand.'
Then:
'The Sultan swore to distribute fairly the treasures found in the city. According to tradition the troops were free to loot and sack the city for three days.'
and
'The excesses which followed, during the early hours of the Ottoman victory, are described in detail by eyewitnesses. They were, and unfortunately still are, a common practice, almost a ritual, among all armies capturing enemy strongholds and territory after a prolonged and violent struggle. '
but:
'In some distant neighborhoods, especially near the sea walls in the sea of Marmora, such as Psamathia, but also in the Golden Horn at Phanar and Petrion, where local fishermen opened the gates, while the enemy soldiers were pouring into the city from the land gates, local magistrates negotiated successfully their surrender to Hamza Bey's officers. Their act saved the lives of their fellow citizens. Furthermore their churches were not desecrated. '
http://www.greece.org/Romiosini/fall.html
Lest it be thought that this was a particularly odious 'Asiatic' practice, the same thing happened in Europe, as the fall of Rome to Charles V's Lutheran mercenaries illustrates, or the sack of Magdeburg, or the fall of Munster.
http://www.strategypage.com/cic/docs/cic66c.asp
Of course the city was rebuilt, refortified and repopulated, Greek subjects allowed to maintain their faith, and a new Patriarch, Gennadius elected, who lost no time in accepting control of the Orthodox churches of Serbia and Bulgaria, and finally repudiating union with Rome.
Why refound Byzantium anyway? The Byzantine Empire was markedly less tolerant than the Ottoman Empire.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:34
|
|
"Why refound Byzantium anyway? The Byzantine Empire was markedly less tolerant than the Ottoman Empire."
Because one of the owners of this site is Greek, and he's kicking in a Poly T-shirt to Oerdin, a Polytoner who is stationed in Tikrit. Nice thing to do...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Would you like to go back to my place, bouncy-bouncy?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|