 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Actually, they were all over the desert. Remember the movie "Lawrence of Arabia"? they attack Aqaba, a city on the southern tip of Jordan. That particular family might not have yielded much power, but there are many more other nomads. |
One-a city in souther Jordan-well, if you remember, there were really no lines there-but again, souther jordan, as in not the land occupied by proto-palestinians..
also, yes, there were lots of nomads, and they did NOT particularly suport each other. The Sauds were one family of nomads-way deeper inland, and it was this one tribe that finally ended Hashemite control of the Hejaz and guardianship of Mecca.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
The probelm with that line of thinking is that the Pals have some wonderful teachers- I mean, it took 1800 years, but the jews made it back, no? After alll, whom in 580 ad would have thought a new Jewish kingdom would veer rise up again around Jerusalem? not to mention 180 ad (or whenever the second revolt was finally crushed)? |
Teachers - whom? The Revisionist Zionists, who wanted a state on BOTH banks of the Jordan river, to accomodate the circa 1935 Jewish population of Eastern Europe? Their spiritual descendants, who dont want to withdraw from a single settlement in the West Bank or even Gaza??? On the contrary, Israel was built by visionaries, but by PRAGMATIC visionaries, who were REPEATEDLY willing to settle for half a loaf. The Pals have their Jabotinskys, Sterns, and Begins in abundance (and leaders much worse than any of those) but where are their Ben Gurions, their Arlosoroffs, their Weizmans, their Rabins? When they find them, they will find their way to a state (Im hoping for Dahlan, who seems to have more spine than Abu Mazen)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
There is no lowering of immideate activity; However, statistics show that the more pressure Israel is putting on the terrorists, the less suicide bombings, and other attacks on civilians take place. | Then, I can understand and probably continue the assasinations if my overall goals were being met. Just remember that this could blow up in Israel's face.
If I were a leader of the Palestinians I would use Israel's assasinations to rally my people. Especially the ones who are on the fence to increase the amount of attacks. I would escalate the conflict until the other side was willing to halt their aggression and talk.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Teachers - whom? The Revisionist Zionists, who wanted a state on BOTH banks of the Jordan river, to accomodate the circa 1935 Jewish population of Eastern Europe? Their spiritual descendants, who dont want to withdraw from a single settlement in the West Bank or even Gaza??? On the contrary, Israel was built by visionaries, but by PRAGMATIC visionaries, who were REPEATEDLY willing to settle for half a loaf. The Pals have their Jabotinskys, Sterns, and Begins in abundance (and leaders much worse than any of those) but where are their Ben Gurions, their Arlosoroffs, their Weizmans, their Rabins? When they find them, they will find their way to a state (Im hoping for Dahlan, who seems to have more spine than Abu Mazen) |
Who said teacher need to be good? And I doubt supporters of Jabotinsky and Begin would agree with your characterization that they did not also help build Israel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Who said teacher need to be good? And I doubt supporters of Jabotinsky and Begin would agree with your characterization that they did not also help build Israel. |
Look, youre saying the Jews waited for 1800 years to get a state, and they finally got one so why should the Pals settle for a compromise. Fine. So let them cut a deal for Gaza and 94% of the West Bank now, and KEEP THEIR DREAMS of taking the whole area. Dictating peoples dreams is NOT within the realm of liberal politics. What im interested in is not their dreams, which are their own, but their actions. The ACTIONS I expect are a territorial compromise, one that gives them a viable state but recognizes theyre NOT going to get all they might have gotten had they recognized Israel in say 1950. Just as I ask my revisionist friends to KEEP your dream, but make a territorial compromise NOW. I think Israel MUST withdraw from 90% of the West Bank or more. Do you think I will not still DREAM of Hevron, of Shechem, the hill country of Ephraim, of the ancient homes of my people? But a politics of dreams ALONE is a politics of disaster. One must wake from dreams and face the cold light of day. The moderate elements of the Israeli left have done so. Every now and then Sharon gives the impression of having done so (but not so consistently that i dont still prefer a Labour PM) A few Pal intellectuals have done so, and Abu Mazen gave strong signs of having done so. But Hamas has not done so, much of Fatah has not done so, Arafat has not done so, and many Pals who follow Arafat and Hamas have not done so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002 time: 15:34
|
|
quote: quote:
Originally posted by paiktis22
Damn I wanted to visit the Holy Places this Passover
Originally posted by Azazel
so, what's the problem? |
What Azazel means to say is: it won't get any worse than it is now. Hamas getting its leader killed won't let it magically conjure up more suicide bombings or bombers. So if you were planning on going to Israel, the same risk exists now as before.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:34
|
|
You think? I'd say the next few weeks will see an expansion of the suicide bombers campaigns. It's what always seems to happen after a terrorist faction leader is taken out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Look, youre saying the Jews waited for 1800 years to get a state, and they finally got one so why should the Pals settle for a compromise. Fine. So let them cut a deal for Gaza and 94% of the West Bank now, and KEEP THEIR DREAMS of taking the whole area. Dictating peoples dreams is NOT within the realm of liberal politics. What im interested in is not their dreams, which are their own, but their actions. The ACTIONS I expect are a territorial compromise, one that gives them a viable state but recognizes theyre NOT going to get all they might have gotten had they recognized Israel in say 1950. Just as I ask my revisionist friends to KEEP your dream, but make a territorial compromise NOW. I think Israel MUST withdraw from 90% of the West Bank or more. Do you think I will not still DREAM of Hevron, of Shechem, the hill country of Ephraim, of the ancient homes of my people? But a politics of dreams ALONE is a politics of disaster. One must wake from dreams and face the cold light of day. The moderate elements of the Israeli left have done so. Every now and then Sharon gives the impression of having done so (but not so consistently that i dont still prefer a Labour PM) A few Pal intellectuals have done so, and Abu Mazen gave strong signs of having done so. But Hamas has not done so, much of Fatah has not done so, Arafat has not done so, and many Pals who follow Arafat and Hamas have not done so. |
Well, there is a slight difference-you see, Jews can imagine a wonderful old kingdom they once had- and dream about the past, as you seem to do-whether this has any bearing with reality, different matter.
But the palestinians have nothing to dream about-their state was stillborn. They were fundamentally correct to feel what was going on in the mandate in the 1920's, 30's and 40's was completely against the values their rulers had voiced-they were denied self-determination, and when it came time for them to have any real political say, this was crushed by both the neighboring arab states and the Israelis. So what can a Palestinian dream about? The wonderful time in the 1930's?
Palestinian identity was being born in the early part of the century, as was all arab nationalism-so the entire palestinian national experience, as that and not just a pan-arab experience, has been rather shitty. Denied thier own state, betrayed in various ways by the self-serving arab leaders who claim to be helping them-why should they then aspire to anything but all? After all, what will it change? They have been victims for all their history-whats a few more centuries of same old, same old?
I really hope Sharon pulls out of Gaza soon and keeps his hands off- the Palestinians need some time of actually havingh real self-rule somewhere to work out their many, many issues.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|