 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Is it true that this was not shown on American television?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
Completely leaving aside for a moment the question of right and wrong:
The continuing guerrilla war against the occupying US forces is exactly what anyone should have predicted long before we even invaded.
It should come as little surprise that an occupied country will contain lots of people willing to risk their lives and even kill their own countrymen in an effort to drive out the invaders.
I'm not defending the actions at all. I'm just saying, it's monumental folly to go invading other countries and expect no one to fight back.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Wll you can understand that if 20 Iraqi police officers are bombed to death in one incedent, and no proper healthcare is offered to the survivors, that the willingness to be employed in such an endeavor is going to subside fairly quickly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:35
|
|
I agree this type of stuff should have been expected. When you plan for something, it's usually best to plan for the worst.
Che - point taken, although it's not a call for a massacre (but rather a call for a tactic I think is really stupid). Edit: two r's, Che, two r's. See:
-Arrian
Last edited by Arrian on 01-04-2004 at 01:11
|
|
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
I think resistance in the Sunni triangle was expected. What wasnt expected was how badly the existing Iraqi police, and other Iraqi government institutions, would fall apart. |
When you destroy the government, by definition you get anarchy. An occupier can't just impose a government and expect anything different, especially when the occupier is as hated as the US is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
I think that the Arab perspective is that this whole thing in Falluja started with American soldiers killing 3 Iraqi demonstrators sometime in 2003, and then the situation has gradually escalated. The Americans said that some men in the crowd had begun shooting at them. So in reality it might have been started by maybe some ba'athist agents, and then the whole thing naturally evolved from there. I wonder if the American commander of the area needs to be replaced, or something?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by debeest
When you destroy the government, by definition you get anarchy. An occupier can't just impose a government and expect anything different, especially when the occupier is as hated as the US is. |
On the contrary, there are numerous example in history where an occupier has been able to take advantage of local governing structures.
as for the US being hated, I suggest you read Oerdins thread, or just look at a variety of sources. All evidence suggests that the the Sunni arabs mainly hate us, some mistrust us, and a few like us. Among the Shiites a minority hate us, most mistrust us, and a considerable minority like us. Among the Kurds most like us. All in all not much worse, and probably better, than most occupations.
The number who hate us was reasonably easy to predict. Where the admin got it wrong was in the number who mistrust us, rather than like us, principally among the Shia. They didnt seem to quite realize how much our failure to come to the aid of the Shia in 1991 still rankled.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|