 |
|  |
 |
|
Alexander's Horse
|
 |
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970 time: 15:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
Did I mention that Kiwi veterans considered US soldiers to be, on the average, gutless cowards.
|
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, a tad strong I dare say - I do know from several sources that the Aussies in Vietnam would hide from the Yanks as they went by and take detours to avoid concentrations of them. Their fieldcraft was considered poor and their trigger happiness made for friendly fire incidents.
quote:
One guy said that as soon as the North Koreans turned up, your lot would pack it in and hightail it. |
The rout being stopped by the 3 Battalion Royal Australian Regiment's heroic stand, along with the Canucks, at Kapyong.
http://www.awm.gov.au/korea/operati...ong/kapyong.htm
I love this quote.
quote:
"Major O'Dowd then directed the radio operator to contact anyone. The American 1st Marine Division answered but their operator refused to believe who our operator was speaking for. Major O'Dowd took the phone and demanded to speak to the commanding officer. The general in charge of the [Marine] division came on the phone and told O'Dowd we didn't exist as we had been wiped out the night before. Major O'Dowd said, 'I've got news for you, we are still here and we are staying here.'"
Private Patrick Knowles, 3 RAR, on the morning of 24 April 1951
|
Isn't first marines one of the formations in Iraq now?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
According to the various news agencies the political situation is generally regarded as more important than the situation on the ground. If anyone have any other indication as to what is happening, let it be known. My impression:
The intial attacks were described by Us sources as well-coordinated and professional.
Presumably the insurgents were willing to accept a 10-1 killing ratio - this according to US command. However when the 30-80 dead mercenaries are added to the 88 official dead US soldiers in April so far, and compared with 600-1000 plus dead insurgents that would give a very rough 5-1 kill ratio estimate. The real ratio might be nearer to 3-1 since many of the insurgents may be civilians - this according to Arab news.
How many combat troops is available to the coalition? Well a wild guess is 40.000 US plus 5.000 'private contractors'. The rest is logistics, guard duty, security, staff, and other support roles. UK and others will not see any combat. The number of insurgents is probably limitless.
Supply situation. The road from Baghdad to Falluja is presumably cut off. On the strategic level emergency supplies of humvees originally destined for Israel have been redirected to Iraq, indicationg some degree of ad hoc flexibility. Halliburton have suspended their convoys supplying US troops. Wounded marines have complained of lack of ammunition. Us command have described the roads as 'yellow', as opposed to 'green', meaning clear, and 'red' meaning closed.
It is unclear how the situation is further South. But the coalition troops are keeping to their bases.
Semi-official. British commanders have critizised the Americans for being ham-fisted in their approach. Saying that laying down artillery barrages in civilian areas will not do any good.
Geneva convention has been breached in several instances, and no entity have as yet pronounced their opinion on the legal status of the levée en masse of the Iraqi, or the role of the private contractors.
Near Falluja 2.500 marines are poised in a stand-off. Closing in on Najaf is 25.000 US troops.
It should be noted that Islamic agencies have claimed higher losses regarding the US, but have not denied own losses.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Two things happened with Sadr- his actions garnered him the sort of attention from ther high leadership he porbalby always craved (like getting to meet with the sons of all the Grand Ayatollahs and neogtiators coming all the way from Iran), and he also saw the highr ps would not back him, so that long run he would not succeed.
How can the US serve the warrant? Sadr will probably get to stay in Najaf unless the Clerics force him out, and the US would be monumentally stupid to enter Najaf in force trying to get him.
My guess is that some sort of surrender to the Clerics by Sadr will happen. But not a turnover into US hands, or the police. |
And yet they just executed an Iranian hostage. That's a heck of a way to impress a putative ally! Does he belong to some obscure Shiite sect that considers Shiites to be their natural enemies?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|