Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Why do people not like Muslims?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
I just want to pinpoint that the US has been involved in troubles all around the world.


What's your point? The police are involved in virtually all crimes, too

quote:
The US sparks trouble all across the world.


Trouble manages to spark itself most of the time.

quote:
And the Americans will find excuses, will be as self-righteous when they defend these actions, as the average Muslim defending the suicide bombers.


There's a slight difference between peacekeeping in Kosovo and blowing yourself up in a crowded resteraunt.

quote:
You can only imagine the clash when two such big(oted) egoes meet. That's what we are having now. And no offense, Lord Merciless, but you are exactly as bigoted as the average terrorist-supporter. You just support the exactions of the other side.


How are we "bigoted"? The vast majority of people don't "hate" Muslims, they just think a lot of them are a problem (which is true). Moreover, support for US military actions isn't comparable to support for damage directly inflicted upon civilians.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by Whaleboy
Yes. If you're asking me whether I support terrorism, I say that as a pacifist I'll be the first to protest against it. If you asked whether I support the subjugation of women, homosexuals, liberals, intellectuals etc, I say no. I just don't think that I, or anyone else, is so necesarily correct in their views as to force it upon others as "more correct".


You aren't forcing your views on a person by preventing others from forcing their views on that person.

You forget that subjugation of women necessarily includes a coerced partner.

quote:
On the other hand, I see a hell of a lot of good stuff in Muslim culture, not to mention the degree to which many of the advances in the West have been directly due to Islam.


Not due to Islam, to Muslims. Big difference.

Plus, these were Muslims who lived centuries ago.

Spiffor is offline Spiffor
Emperor
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Kucinich
There's a slight difference between peacekeeping in Kosovo and blowing yourself up in a crowded resteraunt.

Where is the difference between blowing up a hospital and blowing up a restaurant? Ah yes, one is "colateral damage", so it must be OK.

I should have been a BenLadenite, and I should explain you that there is nothing personal about killing Americans, they are merely "colateral damage" in the grand scheme of things.

Sandman is offline Sandman
Prince
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001
time: 05:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Why do people not like Muslims? Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

People are cretins who need an 'other' to bounce their own identities off.

There are scores of conflicts going on around the world which don't involve any Muslims whatsoever. But if a war involves Muslims, it's certain to get more media attention.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
Where is the difference between blowing up a hospital and blowing up a restaurant? Ah yes, one is "colateral damage", so it must be OK.


Rather, they intended to blow up the resteraunt, we did not intend to blow up the hospital.

Our actions are superior to theirs in that they direct all their power against civilians, and if they had our power they would be carpet-bombing American cities, but we deliberately try to AVOID killing civilians.

quote:
I should have been a BenLadenite, and I should explain you that there is nothing personal about killing Americans, they are merely "colateral damage" in the grand scheme of things.


Except that it would be false, because you are deliberately targetting them.

Spiffor is offline Spiffor
Emperor
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 06:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Kucinich
quote:
I should have been a BenLadenite, and I should explain you that there is nothing personal about killing Americans, they are merely "colateral damage" in the grand scheme of things.


Except that it would be false, because you are deliberately targetting them.

I'm sure most mainstream BenLadenites don't wish the utter extermination of the American people. They just wanted to scare the Americans into stop meddling in the affairs of the Arab world, while getting publicity for their own group doing so.

You don't make an omelette without breaking some eggs. The death of these people was instrumental to their aims, nothing personal.

cyclotron7 is offline cyclotron7
King
Drowning in Schnitzel
Jan 2001
time: 21:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 09:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

If you want to use the technical meaning of fundamentalism, which is the interpretation of every word of a religious text as literal truth, then all Muslims are in fact fundamentalists, where say, Christians are not. This is not a loaded statement value-wise, I'm just saying that many Christians do not take the Bible as literal truth, but because the Koran is believed to be straight from God, it is interpreted literally. Thus, all Muslims are fundamentalists. Whether all Muslims are extremists is entirely another matter; I would have to say absolutely not.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Our actions are superior to theirs in that they direct all their power against civilians


The US has deliberatlely targeted civilians in the past.

--

As just about the only Muslim on the board (I don't know what Ramo was raised as) I will say that the Islamophobia is troubling. I ask how Christianity looked at 1400, because that is how old Islam is. I seem to remember something called the Dark Ages with all the learning of Rome and Greece preserved in the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain.

Oncle Boris is offline Oncle Boris
Prince
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Honestly Imran I think Islam is worse right now than even what Christianty has been. Religion is probably not the cause (any religion can become subject to reappropriation), but even in the Middle Ages Christians had safe-thought havens in Universities.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Honestly Imran I think Islam is worse right now than even what Christianty has been.


Studying a great amount of history during the 'Dark Ages', I'd have to disagree with that sentiment. The difference is that technology is being applied to these 'backward' views.

quote:
even in the Middle Ages Christians had safe-thought havens in Universities.


Ask Galileo or those branded 'heretics'.

DinoDoc is offline DinoDoc
Emperor
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999
time: 23:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I ask how Christianity looked at 1400, because that is how old Islam is. I seem to remember something called the Dark Ages with all the learning of Rome and Greece preserved in the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain.
And I find it quite sad that the religion/civilization has been hijacked to such an extent that OBL can attract a large following.

Oncle Boris is offline Oncle Boris
Prince
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Studying a great amount of history during the 'Dark Ages', I'd have to disagree with that sentiment. The difference is that technology is being applied to these 'backward' views.


What?

quote:

Ask Galileo or those branded 'heretics'.


Galileo didn't have the backing of any religious organizations. The same thing could have happened to Thomas of Aquinus hadn't he been a Dominican.

Besides, the 'Golden Age' of the Inquisition, IIRC, was during the Renaissance (15th to 17th century), and not the so-called 'Dark Ages'.

The problem is that conditions varied within Christianty just like they do within actual Islam. I prefer to suspend my judgment for now, the comparison is just too hard to make. But in essence as you pointed out they are probably similar.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
And I find it quite sad that the religion/civilization has been hijacked to such an extent that OBL can attract a large following.


May I point to the 30 Years War?

quote:
What?


It is no worse than Christianity back then, only they have more technology so are able to be more repressive. In certain pockets, the Church couldn't reach because of the space between people.

quote:
Galileo didn't have the backing of any religious organizations.


Isn't that the point? What about Luther? He was a monk and was only saved by political authorities. What about those monks who were burned at the stake?

quote:
the 'Golden Age' of the Inquisition, IIRC, was during the Renaissance (15th to 17th century), and not the so-called 'Dark Ages'.


Heretics didn't exist before the Inquisition? Are you being serious?

Oncle Boris is offline Oncle Boris
Prince
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001
time: 00:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 10:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
It is no worse than Christianity back then, only they have more technology so are able to be more repressive. In certain pockets, the Church couldn't reach because of the space between people.


Yes.

quote:

Isn't that the point? What about Luther? He was a monk and was only saved by political authorities. What about those monks who were burned at the stake?


Oh well, count in any powerful organization, whatever their nature. As for monk burning, I never heard of it as a frequent occurence.

quote:

Heretics didn't exist before the Inquisition? Are you being serious?


Of course there were clashes between intellectuals and the Church. I was only pointing out that the period ranging from the 8th century to the 14th probably wasn't worse than the Renaissance, contrary to popular belief. For instance, the Church was surprisingly tolerant to Aristotle when he reached the Latin West.

My point was only to question the idea of a 'dark age'.

Dis is offline Dis
Emperor
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000
time: 21:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 11:41 Visit Dis's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

I have nothing against muslims.

I have a mosque accross the street from where I live. Doesn't bother me the least bit. More power to them.

But I don't care for the middle east very much. But that's more of a political reason, nothing personal. I just don't care about their religious politics.

Ted Striker is offline Ted Striker
Emperor
United States of America
Jan 1970
time: 21:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 11:49 Visit Ted Striker's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Moderate muslims need to take responsibility for those extremists that take their religion and pervert it for things like Al Queda terrorism.

Never has the Muslim community as a whole openly condemned these groups who intentionally kill innocents in the name of Islam. Ironically it's the clerics in Iraq that have recently shown the most moderation out of all of them, in condemning the horrible acts that have been committed.

I wonder what would have happened had Al Queda detonated the recent chemical bomb in Jordan? Would the Arab and Muslim communities still look the other way?

It's the same thing with the way Catholics have turned a blind eye to all of the priests who have molested all those little kids.

Yes it's the extremists that give the majority of those groups a bad name, but it's also the responsibility of those in the group to say, "hey THAT is not US, those guys are wackos, they are not true Muslims and what they are doing is WRONG."

Why is it so hard for the Muslim and Arab communities to say that?????????


WHY?

bipolarbear is offline bipolarbear
King
of Persia and the Communist Party of Apolyton
Feb 2004
time: 22:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 11:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Moderate muslims need to take responsibility for those extremists that take their religion and pervert it for things like Al Queda terrorism.

How?

:) Smiley is offline :) Smiley
Emperor
USCA, Berkeley
Feb 2001
time: 21:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 11:58 Visit :) Smiley's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Don't they have some equivalent of excommunication?

Ted Striker is offline Ted Striker
Emperor
United States of America
Jan 1970
time: 21:35
Post  Old Post 29-04-2004 12:15 Visit Ted Striker's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by bipolarbear

How?


All they have to do is speak up. That's it.

When Sistani says something in Iraq, EVERYBODY listens to what he says. Not only that, most of the time alot of people will want to do whatever he says. One of the main reason alot of the hostages were recently released is because many of the clerics condemned the actions and asked for the hostages to be released.

There are no equivalents in the Muslim world of a Sistani. Nobody who has ever stepped up and said, "these guys are not part of what we stand for."

Unless someone wants to educate me on that voice and who exactly it is. And furthermore why I don't hear it.

Recently in the Arab world, the Emir from Qatar spoke up and said that the Arabs need to stop blaming all of their problems on the Israeli-Palestininan conflict. He said that Arab leaders need to look to themselves to fix their own problems which mainly involve the oppression of their own populations.

Really, when you look at it, the Arab and Muslim communities have turned their backs on the Palestinians just as much and probably moreso than anyone else, hijacking them for their own perverted and political purposes.

"Oh damn I just contracted the clap, if those damn Israelis would just free the Palestinians maybe this wouldn't have happened to me."

Then we have posionous networks like Al Jazerra which is the Arab equivalent of the Jerry Springer show except in this case people actually die on the show.

Last edited by Ted Striker on 29-04-2004 at 12:21

Zevico is offline Zevico
Chieftain
Melbourne
Apr 2002
time: 15:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 12:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

I try not to think about this too much.
My view is as such: The majority-or at least a very large portion- of Muslims in the world hate Western civilisation or nations and wish them destroyed. They also think that jews are trying to 'take over the world'.
Therefore, I think it quite reasonable that I dislike that segment of the Muslim population of the world, considering they want to kill me and my family. If I met a Muslim that didn't think that "zionists are evil brutal killers" and "the west is evil, bla bla bla bla" or something like that, I'd be fine with them.

Az is offline Az
King
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000
time: 07:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 14:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Intersting thread. I shall return.

Monk is offline Monk
Emperor
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970
time: 06:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 16:13 Visit Monk's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

My major problem with Islam lies in that it doesn't allow for individualism. The examples are legion with the close ties between religion and politics being the most obvious. I'm aware that religion by definition presupposes submission, but pictures of Muslims gathered in a religous ceremony on their knees, none of their faces (identities) visible, all united and submissive to the highest degree... there's nothing as scary and dangerous as collective identity at this level.

Another example is the need for leaving a permanent mark on children as a religious statement. I can't help but comparing this to the Christian ritual of inaguration that leaves no mark when your hair has dried up and I wonder why this difference exists.

(edit - let's stay with the topic and not begin talking about circumcision's medical benefits etc.)

Last edited by Monk on 29-04-2004 at 16:21

DinoDoc is offline DinoDoc
Emperor
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999
time: 23:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 17:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote:
And I find it quite sad that the religion/civilization has been hijacked to such an extent that OBL can attract a large following.


May I point to the 30 Years War?
Yes, you may. Especially since you seem to be advancing the notion that Arabic civilization seems to be stuck 600 years in the past and you see nothing wrong with that.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 17:43 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:

There's a slight difference between peacekeeping in Kosovo and blowing yourself up in a crowded resteraunt.


Are you sure? If you take military action, you may see as justified others will not concur, and we of all people should understand that. For example, Palestinians will see suicide bombers as freedom fighters wereas you and I see them as murderers. We may see an action as peacekeeping, another will see it as imperialism, and we are no more correct that they are. The person behind the gun is going to have a different opinion to the person in front of it.

quote:

You aren't forcing your views on a person by preventing others from forcing their views on that person.


Different context to a libertarian society, so principles of libertarianism are not neutral when we are dealing with a society that does not operate on the same premises we do. Your best bet is to view it as something of a house of cards. Picture our society as one cell, Islam as another. No matter how libertarian or relativist one cell is, forcing that upon another on the same level is not a relativist act. That means one should use the cell resting on both, what I call a "pseudo-objective", which says "to each society, his own".

quote:

People are cretins who need an 'other' to bounce their own identities off.


Very true, after all, we all need our enemies, lest we emulate Socrates.

quote:

then all Muslims are in fact fundamentalists


That is uninformed BS.

quote:

And I find it quite sad that the religion/civilization has been hijacked to such an extent that OBL can attract a large following.


As I said, cause-consequence. Things like that don't happen on their own, and the West is very far from blameless.

quote:

the Muslim community as a whole


A contradiction in terms

quote:

Therefore, I think it quite reasonable that I dislike that segment of the Muslim population of the world, considering they want to kill me and my family. If I met a Muslim that didn't think that "zionists are evil brutal killers" and "the west is evil, bla bla bla bla" or something like that, I'd be fine with them.


Interesting, you would choose to like or dislike someone based upon their opinions, not their intent to act upon them?

quote:

My major problem with Islam lies in that it doesn't allow for individualism. The examples are legion with the close ties between religion and politics being the most obvious. I'm aware that religion by definition presupposes submission, but pictures of Muslims gathered in a religous ceremony on their knees, none of their faces (identities) visible, all united and submissive to the highest degree... there's nothing as scary and dangerous as collective identity at this level.


You'll find that in all the Semitic religions. You'll note that collective worship and rituals is no barrier to individual thought. Indeed, before we started screwing with them, Islamic civilisation was one of the, if not the most enlightened civilisations on the face of this Earth, where men were trained as poets and philosophers.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 17:44 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:

Yes, you may. Especially since you seem to be advancing the notion that Arabic civilization seems to be stuck 600 years in the past and you see nothing wrong with that.


Specifically, what makes your way the right way and theirs the wrong?

Monk is offline Monk
Emperor
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970
time: 06:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 17:57 Visit Monk's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#86 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by Whaleboy
You'll find that in all the Semitic religions. You'll note that collective worship and rituals is no barrier to individual thought. Indeed, before we started screwing with them, Islamic civilisation was one of the, if not the most enlightened civilisations on the face of this Earth, where men were trained as poets and philosophers.


Are you seriously arguing that collectivism isn't a barrier to individual thought? I hardly know what to say now.

I'm aware of the fact that the Jews are much like the Muslims in this regard, and I do find that questionable as well. The thing is that the Jews are generally well-integrated, self-supporting and educated to an extent significantly above that of the Muslims. And there are a lot less of them, too.

Jac de Molay is offline Jac de Molay
Prince
Detroit
Sep 2001
time: 05:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 18:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#87 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Striker


All they have to do is speak up. That's it.



Kudos for the best post yet.

There's two problems IMO. The tendency for Islam to almost invariably lash out and blame others for its own problems, and the allowance of the most radical aspects to hijack the religion as a whole. This is happening in too many hotspots to name. It's up to the moderates and scholars to take back their religion, and quickly.

our_man is offline our_man
Prince
Glasgow, Scotland
Oct 2000
time: 05:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 18:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#88 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

I think the dislike of Muslims has several reasons, but a lot of it is simply down to fear. Think like the red menace in 50's America. There might be cause for some concern, but it's blown completely out of proportion. Not all Muslims are Bin Laden fans the same way not all communists were Stalins buddies back then.

Most of the ones in the West I believe have similar values to our own. Despite the fact that good Muslims aren't meant to be concerned with material wealth, Ireland's Muslim population went to 3,000 to 19,000 in ten years, coinciding with the Celtic Tiger era. In other words, despite the protestations you might here from them, they're here for the money. And that stuff about covering women up - rubbish; let's just say it appears a lot of the Muslim girls are being left on the shelf in Ireland. You're far more likely to see the guys trying to chat up Christian Irish girls.

This is just for the majority of the Muslims living in the West. I have no problem in condemning the rest of the Muslim world for a litany of abuses. Having non-Muslim friends in Muslim countries and hearing their stories about what back home is like, you get the sense that there is a "we are the master religion" vibe about Islam, and that it is perfectly OK for non-Muslims to be treated as inferiors. A lot of what goes on in Muslim countries is not acceptable and I honestly don't believe we're doing enough to change their way of thinking (for a recent example of our inability to act, see the ongoing genocide in Sudan). I'll freely admit that I'd find it frightening to wake up living in a Muslim country one day, as I believe I would find my rights curtailed.

I still don't believe that the Muslim culture is inferior per se; you can't really label it as a homogenous thing. I've been to Turkey, which is Muslim yet embraces western culture. Another example; a homosexual finished second in the race for the student presidency in UCD this year. The auditor of the Islamic Society let it know that he would have been most displeased if he had won the race; in the next issue of the student paper one of the Muslim students publicly rebuked the auditor for his bigotted stance.

I believe that the West is more tolerant than the Muslim world, but I don't think labelling Muslim culture as inferior is quite correct. Certain values being promoted at the moment in Islam (e.g. the Saudi Arabian branch of the religion, Wahabbism) are the main problem.

Spiffor is offline Spiffor
Emperor
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 19:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#89 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Ted Striker:

It is difficult for a Muslim cleric to speak up and be listened to, because the Sunni are a disorganized bunch, without an equivalent to our pope. You speak about Sistani, and he's a shi'a, a religion where there is a hierarchy, and a main priest (the Ayatollah).
The Sunnis don't have this kind of hirerachy - as such, any imam condemning a barbarous act (and I trust there are some) will do it in his own little corner.

For example, in France we have tried to prop up the leader of the Paris mosque as the main guy in our Muslim scene. He's an agreeable guy who defends the ideas of tolerance and integration in the French society. Whenever the TV needs a PC Muslim, he gets broadcasted. Yet, it is a purely articificial job done by the TV and the State, because this guy is no more representative of French Islam than Chicago's chief priest is representative of American christianty.

DinoDoc is offline DinoDoc
Emperor
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999
time: 23:35
  Old Post 29-04-2004 19:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#90 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
Originally posted by Whaleboy
Specifically, what makes your way the right way and theirs the wrong?
Specifically what makes you think I'm at all interested in getting diverted into a relativistic debate on if it is OK to go around murdering civilians to put forth a political/religious point?

 
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35.
Apolyton Time is 00:35.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0707 seconds (92.79% PHP - 7.21% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net