 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:36
|
|
My main problem with unemployment is not the existence of the program - well, it is, but that's a separate issue. My main issue is that the state transfers the cost, in many cases, to the former employer.
Now, if the state wants to hand money out, fine - I disagree, obviously, but I'm being taxed either way. But that's the state's problem, not the business's problem. If a business fires someone for, for example, refusing to work on Sunday because of religious beliefs, the State cannot refuse to pay out unemployment (Supreme Court decision, can't recall case citation). If the State pays unemployment, then most likely the employer will pay as well.
But wait a minute. If it didn't fit the employer's business needs to employ a person who couldn't work on Sunday, why should they have to pay to fire that person? Doesn't quite seem fair that business needs can be subordinated to personal religious beliefs, now does it?
In any case, I have a final exam to take so I've gotta run, but I'd be (marginally) satisfied if employers were not forced to pay out unemployment compensation. If the state wants to, that's the states business, but don't raise taxes or get money from the employer in order to do so.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|