 |
| |
|
|
Arnelos
|
 |
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:36
|
|
Status
- Republic
- Researching Sometech (x beakers stored, need x beakers total, x turns left)
- Treasury x gold (end of last turn), approx +x (+x) gpt, = approx x gold (at begining of turn).
- Running at x/x/0 Sci/Tax/Lux
- Anticipated start of GA - Turn 223 (910 AD)
Ministry of the Interior
NOT READY YET
Economy:
To be edited by MoI
Rushing
See Short, Throughput & Regular Rushing Turn by Turn Approval Thread for general rushing requests
and see Turn 171, 550AD post in that thread for this turn's specific requests and approvals.
Edit the post link when coping and pasting.
To be edited by MoI
Worker Force:
To be edited by MoI
Workers:
To be edited by MoI
Settlers:
To be edited by MoI
Preturn SIM Results: actual save should be the same
Beaker Power = x BPT
Cash Power = x GPT
At 50% = x BPT & x GPT
x (this turn, @50%) + x (previous) = x beakers towards Sometech
x - x = x left after this turn (x more turns).
GNP = x
Mfg = x
Prod = x
GPT = +x (+x CFC)
Ministry of War
MoW Thread
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs thread
Last edited by E_T on 02-07-2004 at 07:12
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
BigFree
|
 |
Acampo, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:36
|
|
Trip: We don't have to move our ships further North in order to keep GWT's forces oocupied in the North. Now that they have seen us, they know we are coming/looking for a LZ. That alone will occupy a lot of units to lock up for each and every tile we are near now.
If we withdraw our ships, out of any possible pre-Navigation view, we can keep GWT guessing and they will have to cover every single tile because they won't know what our approach will be next time. If they see our ships they can make calculations as to just where it would be possible for us to land each and every turn. If we keep them out of sight, they won't know whuch tiles to cover, thus keeping more units occupied in "LZ blocking" duty and thus making for higher odds in a CFC landing/raid.
I'm against showing GWT where any of our ships are. In fact, if you look at Kloreep's pic...if GWT has a Galley forted at 6-6-6 of "The Big Stack" then they will have seen our Big Stack! They know just where we could land! Thus, they know what tiles to cover! Thus we are only tieing up the minimum amount of units we would otherwise be tieing up if they did not know where we were.
Now, I'm telling you guys there won't be a place to land. GWT now has Ansar in the area. Our chance to find an open spot has passed. If you want to go ahead and take a look, then go ahead, but we are wasting a turn doing so.
I think we would be better off withdrawing our Fleet to just outside of any possible sight range of GWT. Then, they won't know if we are sitting just outside our original LZ or we are looking further North or further South. They will have to cover all possibilities. Now, wouldn't that help CFC more?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
conmcb25
|
 |
Angmar
Aug 2002
time: 23:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by BigFree
Trip: We don't have to move our ships further North in order to keep GWT's forces oocupied in the North. Now that they have seen us, they know we are coming/looking for a LZ. That alone will occupy a lot of units to lock up for each and every tile we are near now.
If we withdraw our ships, out of any possible pre-Navigation view, we can keep GWT guessing and they will have to cover every single tile because they won't know what our approach will be next time. If they see our ships they can make calculations as to just where it would be possible for us to land each and every turn. If we keep them out of sight, they won't know whuch tiles to cover, thus keeping more units occupied in "LZ blocking" duty and thus making for higher odds in a CFC landing/raid.
I'm against showing GWT where any of our ships are. In fact, if you look at Kloreep's pic...if GWT has a Galley forted at 6-6-6 of "The Big Stack" then they will have seen our Big Stack! They know just where we could land! Thus, they know what tiles to cover! Thus we are only tieing up the minimum amount of units we would otherwise be tieing up if they did not know where we were.
Now, I'm telling you guys there won't be a place to land. GWT now has Ansar in the area. Our chance to find an open spot has passed. If you want to go ahead and take a look, then go ahead, but we are wasting a turn doing so.
I think we would be better off withdrawing our Fleet to just outside of any possible sight range of GWT. Then, they won't know if we are sitting just outside our original LZ or we are looking further North or further South. They will have to cover all possibilities. Now, wouldn't that help CFC more? |
You all know that BF is a "diamond in the rough" and occassionally his delivery could use a little work. 
But lets think about this guys he has a dam good point here.
Just look at what you can see right now. GWT has it perfectly covered. The chances of having an opening within our movement radius is slim to none.
Im beginning to think like BF (I know thats a scary thought  ). Let pull back and hope the CFC appearance will induce enough fog of war to give us an opening somewhere.
And the other option is to go south.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Trip
|
 |
Hunt Valley
Apr 2002
time: 00:36
|
|
Why not do a Library in AP before Copernicus? We can be generating double science in only 4 turns for the duration of the wonder build.
Makes a lot more sense to me.
Last edited by Trip on 20-08-2004 at 23:42
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.
Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-05-2004 22:11
I've been arguing against the people who want to rush in and look for a spot this turn or the next or the one after that.
|