 |
| |
|
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:36
|
|
The concept of "culture" as put by Asher is generally a way for the upper-class people (in the broadest meaning: it is not purely a question of money) to distinguish themselves from the common man, and feel superior.
Actually, every form of culture wishes to be elitist. L33t H4xx0rz will consider the people who don't share their cultural values as l4m3rZ; lefty pinkoes will consider those who don't share the folklore (clothes, music...) to be sheepish bourgeois; cowboys will consider non-cowboys as "tenderfeet" (this is the English word, right?), etc.
The main difference when it comes to the upper class' "culture", is that the upper class is very efficient at forcing its values to the other subcultures. Nobody here considers himself a l4m4, a sheepish bourgeois, or a tenderfoot. That's because we weren't exposed to these subcultures prejudices toward non-members.
However, we were exposed to the upper class' predjudices toward non members, hence some of us feeling "uncultured" by these standards.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Caligastia
|
|
I'm not young enough to know everything anymore.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
OzzyKP
|
 |
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Arrian
Ozzy,
You really have a burr up your butt about this whole "ageism" thing.
It works two ways. Kids, particularly in the immediate pre-teen and teen years, have a strong tendency towards arrogance - a "I know everything, you're an idiot" mindset. I know this because I and my friends all had it at the age, to varying degrees. How could our parents be SO dumb, out of style, etc?
The natural adult reaction to that is mild scoffing. Which seems to really get at you.
-Arrian |
Two things. First they are exaggerating/overcompensating for being labeled and treated as idiots who know absolutely nothing.
Second, this is exactly the attitude their parents and adults around them adopt, so they learn from it and copy it. The difference is when you have that attitude when you're young you are arrogant (correct) but when you have the same attitude when you're older then you are normal (incorrect).
Lord knows my parents have that attitude, and many other people I know.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Imran Siddiqui
|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:36
|
|
quote:
We're talking about things like music and literature, which are unabashedly subjective, so it's not based on intellect. |
But they aren't unabashedly subjective. There are some music which is considered 'better' by an internal objective measurment of music. For example, Norah Jones is better than William Hung (the American Idol contestant who has a contract because he is sooo bad). There are some objective measures put into place within the music universe. People can say that the Rolling Stones were good, but Vanilla Ice was crap based on those standards.
After all, why do critics have jobs? Because people value their opinions and believe they have a good handle on what is good or bad music. They have an objective faith in them.
quote:
You've said it yourself, it's based on popularity. The "cultured" people like what's popular (seeing as they have survived filtering down through history ). |
So you would consider Classical Music of, say, Mozart to be 'popular' today? 
Things which have filtered down through history may not, and a lot times are not, the popular thing. They may have been the popular thing at one point in time (or not), but are filtered down because of the objective measures of the world of music. People who weren't ever popular find life in history's filter because it is realized how technically proficient or just how good they really were later on, when standards may have shifted.
quote:
If the "cultured" people were as smart as they say they are, they'd know that bringing down others for being "non-cultured" because they don't share the same interests is stupid... |
Why? As Spiffor said:
The main difference when it comes to the upper class' "culture", is that the upper class is very efficient at forcing its values to the other subcultures.
It's actually pretty damned smart, I'd say.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
But they aren't unabashedly subjective. There are some music which is considered 'better' by an internal objective measurment of music. For example, Norah Jones is better than William Hung (the American Idol contestant who has a contract because he is sooo bad). |
I can't stand listening to either. 
quote:
There are some objective measures put into place within the music universe. People can say that the Rolling Stones were good, but Vanilla Ice was crap based on those standards. |
No, no, no. You simply cannot have "objective" measures in an art. There may be generally accepted subjective standards, but those still are not objective. You cannot objectively say if any form of art is good or bad, which means intellect has no part in it.
quote:
After all, why do critics have jobs? Because people value their opinions and believe they have a good handle on what is good or bad music. They have an objective faith in them. |
People who have "objective faith" in critics are so stupid, that I wouldn't know where to begin with them.
quote:
So you would consider Classical Music of, say, Mozart to be 'popular' today? |
Mozart was popular then, and certainly is popular today. Everyone knows who Mozart is, which is why it's particularly easy to act elitist, snobbish, and therefore "cultured' if you claim to listen to Mozart.
quote:
Why? As Spiffor said:
The main difference when it comes to the upper class' "culture", is that the upper class is very efficient at forcing its values to the other subcultures.
It's actually pretty damned smart, I'd say. |
?
It's "smart" because the upperclass tries to force its values to others? That's very interesting logic...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OzzyKP
|
|
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Arrian
Then your parents need to grow up a bit. It's generally something that subsides with age (but may come back with a vengence in old age. See: father, mine).
|
This bit is interesting. How old are you Arrian? Not to take this into the personal realm, but if you are middle ageish and you see kids as arrogant know-it alls, and the elderly as arrogant know-it alls, do you find it convenient the one age group you give a pass to is your own?
I imagine it is a common trait of all people to see themselves and their peers in possession of some superior form of knowledge. That's what factors into this whole debate. Seniors think they know more, mid-age folks think they know more, and youth think they know more. Usually this stems from ignorance of the other groups, and that exists for all three.
The difference is that the mid-age folks are the ones who hold power in society, so they can shape and control the other two groups. (or more likely shape and control youth, and just ignore seniors)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Imran Siddiqui
|
|
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:36
|
|
quote:
I can't stand listening to either. |
Not the point. The point is that Norah Jones is considered better because of objective measurements in music.
quote:
You simply cannot have "objective" measures in an art. There may be generally accepted subjective standards, but those still are not objective. You cannot objectively say if any form of art is good or bad, which means intellect has no part in it. |
Generally accepted subjective standards tend to turn into, for all intents and purposes, objective standards, especially after a few generations. And how does intellect not play a role in subjectivity? In order to argue your case, that your subjective notion is better than B's subjective notion, you have to have intellect
quote:
People who have "objective faith" in critics are so stupid, that I wouldn't know where to begin with them. |
Is that your subjective view about people's views on art? 
Obviously critics have a job for a reason. People believe they can tell them what the standards are and if this work matches them.
quote:
Mozart was popular then, and certainly is popular today. Everyone knows who Mozart is, which is why it's particularly easy to act elitist, snobbish, and therefore "cultured' if you claim to listen to Mozart. |
Just because everyone knows him doesn't mean he is popular. How many people listen to Mozart compared to the popular acts of today? I'm sure he sells much less than a million records in the US per year.
quote:
It's "smart" because the upperclass tries to force its values to others? That's very interesting logic... |
It's smart because the upperclass succeeds in forcing its values through its methods. Logic is an art which happens to be lost on you.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.
Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2004 19:57
).
|