 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by johncmcleod
rest of the world combined. |
Wrong
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:36
|
|
I can only give my personal view, and being a non-american, my view on his legacy is rather limited to his foreign policies, not on his domestic ones like the economy.
As he is the first president that I conciously remember, I remember him most as a US president that represented US militarism, and a relentless US policy of confrontation.
The 80's were quite a decade of doom from my perspective: here we had a bad recession, unemployment was high (which didn't effect me too much, as I was a student, but sure did not paint a good picture of what the future could hold for me), and the prospect of a war, likely to turn nuclear, seemed not too far away.
Reagan's policies appeared to do little to diffuse the situation, on the contrary: he chose confrontation.
The many wars that were fought (in Africa, middle and south-america, asia, war on drugs etc.) showed that the US was capable of doing bad things, and it was clear the world wasn't that black and white as what would be comfortable. This didn't really strengthen me in the opinion we had the right guys on our side.
Reagan was scary, and the most frightening thing was his apparent idiocy at times, the most frightening example his 'radio-speech' were he notified the US-populace that bombing of the USSR would commence in 15 minutes. Sure, it was very clear this was supposed to be laughed at, but I did so only to get rid of the knot in my stomach, not with a passion.
It was very difficult to feel comfortable with this guy at the helm of the USA, and I was glad he could only serve two terms.
The turn that took place during his presidency was truly amazing however: when Gorbatsjov emerged as leader of the USSR, quite suddenly a thaw in east-west relations occured, and I will be forever thankfull that Reagan did take the opportunaty to cooperate with the Soviets.
I remember very well how thin the edge of the coin appeared, and how uncertain it was if the change of leadership in the USSR, with the announced change in policies as well (perestroika, glasnost, what would it mean?) would really be able to make a difference from the world that was.
And it was evident that Reagan's attitude to the opportunaty at hand would be one of the decisive factors if the world was really to change direction at the crossroads at hand, or if would be only a glimmer of hope that would soon fade away.
IIRC, it was the summit in Reykyavik that really broke the ice in the end, and I remember very well the releive I felt when the historic thaw became apparent.
If anything, I think that the greatest achievement of Ronald Reagan is that he took the opportunaty at hand with the rise of Gorbatsjov, and that he was able to end his path of confrontation, and switch to a path of cooperation.
I will remember Reagan for a long time as the caracter from the 'Frankie goes to Hollywood' clip though: "when two tribes go to war", and it may be very well that this clip showed very much the situation where both the USA and the USSR found themselves: the ring-fight they were both in was not going to get them anywhere, and it was draining both there resources to an unacceptable level.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|