 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
If the US is so concerned about human rights we should intervene. |
I thought we did.
quote: Sudanese peasants will be naming their sons ``George Bush'' because he scored a humanitarian victory last week that could be a momentous event around the globe -- although almost nobody noticed. It was Bush administration diplomacy that led to an accord to end a 20-year civil war between Sudan's north and south after 2 million deaths.
If the peace holds, hundreds of thousands of lives will be saved, millions of refugees will return home, and a region of Africa may be revived. |
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/merc.../8808070.htm?1c
That's not to say this won't fail, or that we can't do more, but we've certainly done something
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
That would be good.
Here, the TV media started talking about Darfur only 3 days ago, as a team of journalists sent their report after a week there or so. The tone of the article was far less accusatory as what it should have been. Sure, we only got to see the vsurvivors of the ethnic cleansing, and not the perpetrators, but it really didn't insist on the blatant: a government-made ethnic cleansing.
It may have to do with Sudan giving us something in the past (renowned terrorist Carlos), traded for France's neutrality in Sudan's internal affairs. | \
The US has tended to look away, as Sudan has helped in the fight against Al Qaeeda, and has pursued a peace in the South.
That to me, is why this is important. We need to make clear that even help on other issues wont make us look away from genocide. The US govt has started to make some noises in this direction, but IMHO wont go far enough unless pressed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
I would like to keep humanitarian intervention against genocide seperate from democracy promotion. The former while still controversial, is accepted by many as a point of international law. The latter, as motive by itself for regime change, is not going anywhere anytime soon. This does not mean the US and others cant concern themselves with democracy promotion, or that there isnt a concern with, say, the issues of sharia in Nigeria - but theres no prospect of intervention by force solely on that basis.
But genocide, is , fortunately, fairly rare. Even there it may not be possible to establish a universal standard of intervention - but we can go far in that direction, and should.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|