 |
|  |
 |
|
alva
|
 |
Republic of Flanders
Sep 2001 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Well, he certainly did do just fine, but I don't think he ever actually won a mountain stage, for instance. |
He didn't, in fact he never won one open stage ( IE, he only won time trials and IIRC only lost one )
He was good enough to win mountain stages but left them to others to 'gain' their support, he was only interested in winning the whole thing, not parts of it. Good tactics.
-
quote: and if anyone should have a problem with steroid rules changing, it should be jan ulrich, who was caught and banned for a year, yet no one ever says that. thye arer all convinved that armstrong cheats, but he has never been caught once in 6 years. |
He was caught doing XTC.
quote: with how the team finishes and stuff.. i forget exactly - but they also changed the Alpe d'Huez stage. it used to be a climb up that hill after 180 km of flats. now they cut it into two stages, and made the uphill a time trial. |
???
They change all stages every year, besides Alpe d'Huez - though famous - is not really the top 'hill'* out there.
The Alpes being old mountains are more suited for the power cyclists,while the pyrenees are more for the real specialists.
The Alps are more even, though they take longer, the total hight is about the same, maximum is about 2000M, which is btw a magical barier.
The reason being that it's much harder to take in oxygen past that point, for Example Lemond had a lot of trouble with it, as most power - instead of the more fluent - cyclists have.
* it's still quit awesome though 
-
Anyone else find it cute how Americans see this event? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pchang
What dod you mean by the best hill climber? There is a special jersey (red polka dot) for the best climber and the winner of the tour rarely wins this. |
For obvious reasons-- Contesting all the intermediate hill points would require large efforts. People attempting to wn the overall classification don't make extra efforts when it will not garner them time advantages.
Riders going for the green or polka dot jersey will make maximum efforts on certain stages to pick up points but then accept that they will lose major amounts of time when not many points are up for grabs. For example O'grady, hushvold and Mcewen will likely just hang with the pack for the next few stages. Time is irrelevant to them as long as they remain in contention for the sprint points.
Virenque had a courageous stage win but efforts like that will usually hurt your time in the long run. I do expect to see Virenque go off the front again in the mountains-- he may even win another stage, but I'm betting he also struggles mightily and loses a lot of time somwhere along the way. That type of effort has to take a lot out of you
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pchang
Will they switch to supporting Kloden instead of Ullrich? |
teams wouldn't usually abandon their leader quite that quickly. Kloden is a good two and a half minutes up on Ulrich now but he doesn't have a history at the tour which would lead the team to quickly jump to him as their leader.
Just to give Kloden a chance, I could see them using a strategy where both Ullrich and Kloden are protected until crunch time . .. . but then if Ulrich is strong, I can see Kloden having to take the role of leading for him. If Ulrich starts to get dropped again, I can see the strategy change
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|