22-07-2004 20:30									#121
	Put an end to popups!

Three stage wins in a row for Lance en route to six straight Tour wins. Greatest cyclist ever...

	22-07-2004 20:35									#122
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Spiffor Wow, there is only one second separating the four first riders. Quite impressive, for a 6 hours long run

But pretty normal as well since the strongest (Armstrong) has no incentive to burn himself out now trying to gain more time and Basso has probably pretty much accepted that he can't catch Armstrong. So those two are just willing to stay with Kloden and Ullrich except that it is still worth it to try for time bonuses for stage wins

	22-07-2004 21:42									#123
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten Three stage wins in a row for Lance en route to six straight Tour wins. Greatest cyclist ever...

Close, but no fish..

	22-07-2004 21:52									#124
	Increase Your PM Length

Keep telling yourself that. No one else has six...

	22-07-2004 21:54									#125
	Increase Your PM Length

Reuters is reporting that the last biker to take 3 stages in the Alps in one tour was Gino Bartali in 1948.

Armstrong's performance this year is rather convincing. Nothing like last year's.

	22-07-2004 23:35									#126
	Increase the size of your Attachments

quote: Originally posted by DanS Reuters is reporting that the last biker to take 3 stages in the Alps in one tour was Gino Bartali in 1948. Armstrong's performance this year is rather convincing. Nothing like last year's.

and apparently Lance is the first ever to win FOUR consecutive mountain stages

Oh and for anyone that says this tour is boring or predictable, thats only true if you care only about the yellow or polka dot jerseys since Armstrong looks unbeatable for yellow and Virenque has clinched the King of the Mountains title.

But the story of Voeckler is ongoing and he has less than a minute on two rivals for the white jersey. The points jersey is also close as I believe there are as many as 4 sprinters that could win the thing. Add to that a possible GC upset if Basso holds second and the hard charge of the CSC riders, Kloden and Ullrich to try to take 2nd and 3rd . .. . heck there are still lots of great stories

	23-07-2004 01:20									#127
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

the finish today was great. i also liked the race at the top of the big mountain between virenque and that other guy. i hope oln shows more bike racing in the future(not just the tour). are there any serious usa bike races?

	23-07-2004 01:25									#128
	Support Apolyton

Tour Dupont was big, I don't know if it is still being sponsored by Dupont tho'.

There was a tour Atlanta IIRC not to long ago.

	23-07-2004 01:41									#129
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten Keep telling yourself that. No one else has six...

And Lance stays out of many other races to concentrate primarily on the tour. He's not a pimple on Eddy Merckx' ass as an overall rider.

	23-07-2004 01:43									#130
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by pg the finish today was great. i also liked the race at the top of the big mountain between virenque and that other guy. i hope oln shows more bike racing in the future(not just the tour). are there any serious usa bike races?

On the " Lance Chronicles" they showed where Armstrong competed with USP at the "Tour de Georgia".
Armstron spoke of the event highly and stated r=that more events like it were needed if elite cyclists were to compete within the US.

	23-07-2004 02:10									#131
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

My bad Tour de Georgia not Tour Atlanta. Like there is anything else worthwhile in Georgia besides Atlanta.

	23-07-2004 03:21									#132
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat And Lance stays out of many other races to concentrate primarily on the tour. He's not a pimple on Eddy Merckx' ass as an overall rider.

Lance will soon be deserving of the crown "best tour de france rider ever" but his focus on this race means he is hardly ever even ranked as the top cyclist in the professional ranks- he just doesn't care enough about any other race so its impossible to know what he could do.

I do think he is far more than a pimple on Merxkx butt though.

	23-07-2004 03:26									#133
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat And Lance stays out of many other races to concentrate primarily on the tour. He's not a pimple on Eddy Merckx' ass as an overall rider.

The problem with the "greatest ever" tags is that improvements in training, nutrition, medecine and equipment mean that there are probably 50 riders that would crush Merckx ( if he raced in his condition and on his old style bike). Even with equal equipment, Armstrong would likely beat any of the old champs due to training methods and a scientific approach that was unavailable to riders in the past-- as well as a team tarined rigorously for the sole purpose of protecting their leader

	23-07-2004 04:30									#134
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: Originally posted by Flubber The problem with the "greatest ever" tags is that improvements in training, nutrition, medecine and equipment mean that there are probably 50 riders that would crush Merckx ( if he raced in his condition and on his old style bike). Even with equal equipment, Armstrong would likely beat any of the old champs due to training methods and a scientific approach that was unavailable to riders in the past-- as well as a team tarined rigorously for the sole purpose of protecting their leader

Correct, the cyclists now climb those mountains a lot faster than in the old days. I can't remember how much but it was a considerable difference. On the other hand the Tour de France back then was a lot harder, because of the reasons you stated there: their inferior equipment, 'treatment' and so on. Also don't underestimate Bruyneel's role in this. It's Lance's team coach and he guided Armstrong to this; His way of working is very professional. Look at all the racers joining US Postal: Beltran, Heras, Rubiera, Azevedo, and various others of previous years all were at their best in the US Postal team; that's an interesting fact. I never considered Azevedo being this good tbh!

Also Armstrong hasn't got any decent competition these days. In the old days there were a LOT of contenders.

	23-07-2004 05:04									#135
	Got spare money?

quote: Correct, the cyclists now climb those mountains a lot faster than in the old days.

Yeah, because they're better than the old riders. Armstrong is the best of the current bunch and the best of all time. Merckx would get destroyed by Armstrong...

quote: Also Armstrong hasn't got any decent competition these days.

Don't sell Ullrich et al short; they're excellent riders. They just happen to be going up against the best ever, which can make anyone look bad.

	23-07-2004 05:20									#136
	Modern Methods Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Certainly the biggest difference between riders of today and yesteryear are the advances in training, nutrition, and medicine. Riders should be able to maintain their health and top conditioning longer. In the event of crashes or other injury, they can come back at a higher level too. I think this is biggest reason why Lance could win 6 while the other 5 time winners could not.

	23-07-2004 05:22									#137
	Suffering from ads?

quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten quote: Correct, the cyclists now climb those mountains a lot faster than in the old days. Yeah, because they're better than the old riders. Armstrong is the best of the current bunch and the best of all time. Merckx would get destroyed by Armstrong...

If you assumed that Armstrong had the benefits of current equipment, training methods, communications, while Merckx was still back in the 70's, then yes.

Equalize external conditions in either era, and make Armstrong ride as many events as Merckx, or let Merckx rest up and save his strength for the tour, then Armstrong couldn't come close to matching Merckx.

Eddy Merckx:

5 times Tour de France winner (1969-72, 1974) and 35 stage wins. Wore yellow jersey for 96 days.
5 times Giro d'Italia winner (1968, 1970, 1972-74) and 25 stage wins.
Vuelta a Espana winner (1973)
World Champion (1967,1971,1974) (plus amateur in 1964)
Hour record (49.431 km, 1972-84)
3 times Paris-Nice winner (1969-71)
Tour of Switzerland (1974)
7 times Milan-San Remo winner (1966-67, 1969, 1971-72, 1975-76)
Tour of Flanders (1969,1975)
Paris-Roubaix (1968, 1970, 1973)
Liege-Bastogne-Liege (1969, 1971-73, 1975)
Amstel Gold Race (1973,1975)
Tour of Lombardy (1971-72)
Het Volk (1971,1973)
Ghent-Wevelgem (1967, 1969-70, 1973)
Fleche-Wallonne (1967, 1970, 1972, 1975)
Paris-Brussels (1973)
Henninger Turm (1971)
Grand Prix des Nations (1973)

445 wins as a pro.

Only rider ever to win the Tour de France, Giro d'Italia, Vuelta a Espana and Tour of Switzerland.

One of two riders ever to win the Tour de France, Giro d'Italia and world championship in the same year.

One of two riders ever to take the Tour de France and the hour record in the same year.

Only rider ever to win all three major classifications (overall, points, and KotM) of the Tour de France.


So tell me again what all Lance Armstrong has to stack up against that record?

	23-07-2004 05:23									#138
	Got spare money?

quote: If you assumed that Armstrong had the benefits of current equipment, training methods, communications, while Merckx was still back in the 70's, then yes.

Why would I assume differently? That's reality, MtG...

quote: So tell me again what all Lance Armstrong has to stack up against that record?

Soon to be six straight Tour de France titles.

	23-07-2004 05:31									#139
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten quote: If you assumed that Armstrong had the benefits of current equipment, training methods, communications, while Merckx was still back in the 70's, then yes. Why would I assume differently? That's reality, MtG...

Sorry, I assumed when you posted about Merckx getting "destroyed" by Armstrong you were comparing Merckx as a rider to Armstrong as a rider.

I didn't realize you were considering Armstrong now against a 58 year old Merckx. That's "reality."

quote: quote: So tell me again what all Lance Armstrong has to stack up against that record? Soon to be six straight Tour de France titles.

Which doesn't even come close to matching Merckx' overall career records. Not even close.

	23-07-2004 05:36									#140
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote: Sorry, I assumed when you posted about Merckx getting "destroyed" by Armstrong you were comparing Merckx as a rider to Armstrong as a rider. I didn't realize you were considering Armstrong now against a 58 year old Merckx. That's "reality."

Damn you, you clever bastard...

quote: Which doesn't even come close to matching Merckx' overall career records. Not even close.

I guess it depends on what you consider to be an important record. When I compare college football programs, I look at the number of national titles they've won; I don't give a **** about conference titles and all the other, lesser accomplishments. Same thing for cycling. The Tour de France is obviously the premier event and winning it means more to me than a win in the other, lesser races. Good for Merckx and all, but Lance will soon be ahead in the category that counts most.

	23-07-2004 06:47									#141
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

My two cents:

I don't know about best ever title, but one can say that Lance Armstrong is one of the bigger miracle stories in sports history, going from a man with cancer that had spread to multiple parts of his body and almost killing him to being a 5 (soon to be 6) time Tour de France Winner. Best in the world or not, titles or not, you have to give the man credit...

	23-07-2004 08:47									#142
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Only rider ever to win all three major classifications (overall, points, and KotM) of the Tour de France.

If the white jersey had existed in those days he would have one all four in one year.

Plus Merckx won his final TdF after being punched in the kidneys by a Frenchman and breaking his rib.

	23-07-2004 09:02									#143
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

DAMN FRENCHIES!

	23-07-2004 17:30									#144
	Question Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Why did Lance chase down Simeoni in Stage 18 today? Simeoni is over 2 hours behind in the GC.

	23-07-2004 17:46									#145
	Tired of ads?

Whoa! I just turned on my TV (when I realised you weren't talking about yesterday and Simoni), and I think the broadcast had just started, so I saw a "replay" of it...

But this would be the reason:
http://www.loopdiloop.com/folderol/...ni-vs-lance.asp

	23-07-2004 18:32									#146
	Full PM-box? Change here!

I'd have to pick Merckx over Armstrong.

IIRC the interesting thing about the hour record was that he set the 10Km then 20Km then hour record all in the same ride.

	23-07-2004 19:24									#147
	Simeoni vs. Armstrong Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Looks like Armstrong can be a pretty vengeful ***** when he wants to be.

According to the unofficial word in the press room, when Armstrong reached the break earlier with Simeoni, he allegedly said to the others in the break, "If you ride with Simeoni in this breakaway, I'll put my team on the front to chase you down." There will no doubt be more to come in this story today.

	23-07-2004 19:35									#148
	Re: Simeoni vs. Armstrong Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by pchang Looks like Armstrong can be a pretty vengeful ***** when he wants to be. According to the unofficial word in the press room, when Armstrong reached the break earlier with Simeoni, he allegedly said to the others in the break, "If you ride with Simeoni in this breakaway, I'll put my team on the front to chase you down." There will no doubt be more to come in this story today.

I love it -- Whe I saw that he went on Simeoni's wheel, I thought it was the oddest thing ever since NO ONE in the break was even close in the GC-- its the type of break that POstal and CSC and T-mobile can be content t let go and only people trying to catch up for the green jersey would want to chase down--

Here's the yellow jersey leaving the protection of his team to send a personal message. If I was his coach or teammates I would be FURIOUS

	23-07-2004 19:49									#149
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

MTG

As I said, it depends what you compare and what the focus is. I think Lance Armstrong is on his way to becoming the greatest Tour de France Rider ever. I assess this by the criteria of winning what he wants to win which is the yellow jersey. The fact that he rides strategically and therefore does not rack up as many days in yellow ( by preventing or chasing the Voeckler breakaway for instance ), to me does not lessen his status. He simply wins. The fact that he wins systematically and with smarts does not lessen the fact that he wins

If Eddy Merckx at his best with the knowledge and training and skills he had at his prime, were magically dropped onto a current day bike for CSC or T-mobile, I still believe Armstrong would win. I believe in modern training that much.

Now if Eddy Merckx was at his prime and then given a couple of years to train with modern methods, then thats the question that I don't think anyone can answer since there are two unanswerable questions within it

1. How much could modern methods have improved Eddy Merckx?

2. How much better than everyone else is Armstrong today? We really don't know his capacity . .. all his efforts are measured precisely to meet the precise goal of winning. All we do know is that he seems to catch other riders with ease and NOBODY gets away from him that he doesn't want to. Armstrong could probably have held yellow for instance from the time of the team time trial onward but he knew that that was a harder road for the team.

	23-07-2004 20:35									#150
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Flubber - I think the biggest difference is that Armstrong puts nearly his entire racing effort into the Tour de France, while Merckx took on anyone, anytime, in any major event unless he was injured.

Armstrong trains and works on energy management to be in ideal condition for the Tour. Merckx was busy riding and winning everywhere.

Riding strategically is nice, but is that a choice, or a response to a limitation as a rider?

Merckx won the Giro d'Italia (for the uninformed, like Drake , this year's Giro ran 20 stages and 3,435km, so it's no "minor league" event) 3 of the years he won the Tour. Would Armstrong manage to do as well? We don't know, since he doesn't try. Given that there's only a month and a few days between the events, I think Armstrong knows the answer, though, which is why he conserves energy for the tour.

In 1974, Merckx won the Tour de France, Giro d'Italia, Tour of Switzerland and World's road championship. Riding "strategically" for Merckx was simply dominating everyone, everywhere.

In 1970, while also winning the Giro, Merckx wore the yellow jersey in the Tour every stage but one. Another record nobody has come close to approaching.

The era Merckx raced certainly had a large number of excellent riders - Poulidor, Ocana, Van Impe, Zoetemelk, De Vlaemink, Thevenet, Gimondi, Maertens, etc. There certainly was no lack of top level competition.

If you compare the number of events raced, the number won, and overall level of competition, I don't have any doubt that Merckx would eat Armstrong alive with similar training regimens, similar nutrtion regimens and the same technology. Armstrong is a great rider, but still nowhere near the caliber of Merckx, IMO.