 |
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
No, this is a greedy, ruthless casino owner looking at dollar signs, and escorting her off the property is one way of limiting liability. Rondstadt isn't some poor little waif, so if anything of hers was damaged, missing, or if she was intimidated, harassed, or any other tortious conduct, she could sue the casino's pants off. It may be in bankruptcy and in the process of being sold, but lawsuits filed post-bankruptcy petition can be quite disruptive to sales plans. |
And wanting to protect yourself from potentially large liability due solely to the need of some washed-up, has-been of a singer to make a political statement is just being greedy?
Could you tell me where you live so that I may plan an 'accident' for myself on or around your property, since you are obviously not 'greedy' or 'ruthless' enough to not want me to take you to the cleaners in your joke of a court system?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sikander
If I want to learn about singing I might be interested in hearing what Rondstadt has to say. But I'm as interested in her opinion about politics as I am in her opinion about plumbing. |
Music is expression. She expresses her thoughts and feelings in song all the time. Why does expressing it through spoken words make it different?
I think the casino owner (and the audience) overreacted, from what the story says. All she did was dedicate a song to Moore. She didn't endorse everything he says, or even go into specifics (I love how Drudge called it an "Anti-Bush tirade," when Bush apparently wasn't even mentioned, and it certainly wasn't a tirade).
The owner made a big to-do about it and probably gave more ammunition to Moore. On top of that, since Rondstadt was only booked for the one show, the spectacle could serve to alienate far more people from the hotel than it would have had he just let it go and then opted not to hire her again. The story certainly would never have gained national media attention.
So, I suppose he exercised his full rights, but it was done in a stupid, needlessly publicized way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Not always...I doubt casino owners personally review the contents of every song in a performer's program, especially very famous ones.
How is this relevant to what I was addressing? I was addressing Sikander's objection to singer's expressing themselves through means other than song, as if they had no right to do anything other than sing. I don't see why it makes a difference if they express themselves in song or the spoken word or in oragami, for that matter. |
I think casino owners would give their bookers guidelines. Like, I'd like my patrons to be happy, and not get pissed off. Perhaps the patrons would get pissed off because the entertainer thinks that some humongous **** who is very controvertial at the moment due to his active campaigning in multiple countries for left wing causes is a good plan.
You know, they might say, don't hire Castro, or OBL, or Bush for that matter. And don;t hire anyone who is gonna piss off half the audience from one side or the other by saying stupid things.
Common sense, I would have thought.
As a business owner, what my employees say, even the hired monkey out front who is supposed to entertain my clients, is my business. If that monkey pisses off people to the point of them doing violence to parts of the premises, then your damn straight that monkey is gonna be taken out back and shot, double quick.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Duhhh, because the proprietor and his patrons were 'bushwhacked'?
The booker wasn't. The booker should have been led out right after the singer. |
, yet again
I'm not talking about the proprietor, patrons, or the bookers, I'm talking about Sikander. Your continuing to bring up the specifics of this incident, which are NOT what I'm addressing in my comments to Sikander.
I'll phrase it another way, and I'll use plumbing, since then you can't get caught up in the politics sillyness. According to Sikander, a singer shouldn't do anything but sing, as that's all they're experts on. But singers don't just sing "la la la," they express things in their songs--be it love, politics, or plumbing. So if she wrote a song about plumbing, presumably that would be okay, but if she talked about it, suddenly her message is meaningless. My question is, why? The only reason that would be is if one doesn't care about the expression in the songs at all, which would make me wonder why one would even bother to listen to them in the first place.
Last edited by Boris Godunov on 20-07-2004 at 09:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: I'll phrase it another way, and I'll use plumbing, since then you can't get caught up in the politics sillyness. According to Sikander, a singer shouldn't do anything but sing, as that's all they're experts on. But singers don't just sing "la la la," they express things in their songs--be it love, politics, or plumbing. So if she wrote a song about plumbing, presumably that would be okay, but if she talked about it, suddenly her message is meaningless. My question is, why? The only reason that would be is if one doesn't care about the expression in the songs at all, which would make me wonder why one would even bother to listen to them in the first place. |
They sound nice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
And I'm continuing to bring up your own words to you.
|
Not very effectively, because it's only showing you're not grasping their meaning and are arguing something that I'm not arguing about. See above.
quote: I'm trying to tell you what is wrong with the picture, but all you want to do is asert that Ms. R. is a plumber with rights! |
You're not addressing the problem that I posed to Sikander at all, you're addressing some sort of imagined argument where I'm saying Rondstadt has a right to spout off on her political beliefs as she sees fit sans consequences from employers and audiences. I said no such thing.
quote:
Now, maybe Sikander will agree with you that plumbers should be free to spout off profanities while fixing the toilet, or Marx, or show tunes. |
And where did I say the plumbers should be free to so on someone else's dime? I would say plumbers should be free to do so without people dismissing their opinions on the matter because they're not 'experts.' That's the heart of the matter--I despise the notion that if one isn't a politician, one's political views are somehow meaningless. That's precisely the problem in our system, I think.
quote: The point is, you are not 'free' to do as you please without consequences. |
And where did I say otherwise?
quote: You may disagree with the people who are pissed off all you wish, but that will not change the fact that people get pissed off when their entertainment is interupted by a charged political topic. |
And where did I say the people had no right to pissed off about the concert? You're particularly good at the strawmen tonight.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Did she write a song about Mr. Moore that the owner and half the audience just had to hear?
No. She has a very innocuous reputation based on a life time in music, and no doubt the owner himself was a fan. He was there, right? I am. I love Slap Shot and that song ( I think that was her). I can assure you that I would have been very pissed off if she said that at a concert I attended, let alone paid her to perform. |
*sigh* You're still not getting it, despite my best efforts. I'm off to bed, but I'll try once more. I can see the plumbing tack didn't work as I'd hope, because rather than addressing it, you've gone back to the argument in which you're the only participant, since that's not at all what I'm arguing about.
Strip away the concert, the audience, the owner, the booker, the Moore stuff, and hell, even Rondstadt. We'll strip it down to a some very generic general things: Singer, songs, speaking, plumbing.
Sikander's view (as far as I can tell):
Singer makes song: that's okay.
Singer makes song about plumbing: that's okay, presumably (since a song is in his realm of expertise, whatever the subject matter).
Singer speaks about plumbing: That's stupid, because he's not an 'expert' in plumbing.
I'm saying that I don't find the third proposition necessarily true at all, and I find little difference between one speaking about plumbing and one singing about plumbing. Now, if you don't like plumbing, then I imagine you won't like the song that well. But that's not the point, as I doubt one would say the singer was outstepping his bounds to write the song.
But suddenly if it's not a song, it's just the words, the singer becomes inexpert about plumbing and his meaning/expression or whatever on it worthless. Just doesn't follow, for me.
Note this has NOTHING to do the singer interjecting a surprise lecture on plumbing at his next gig, lest we start any more diversions that aren't relevant.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
quote:
It'll affect your job performance in that it'll limit where you can go in the company.
|
Just like women have a glass ceiling?
Not my fault, it's theirs, and theirs alone.
quote:
You want to keep your employer's opinion of you objective, don't give them anything that can make a bias.
|
I'd rather have an employer who wants to have me work for them rather than someone who could care less. I'm not out for an 'objective' employer, just as I'm not an objective employee.
I work better for people when I care for them, and for their business rather than maintaining a shroud of objectivity.
quote:
nor just idly bringing up "I hate them gays" or "I don't like women makin' any choices!".
|
Oh shoot. I'll have to be on my best behaviour. 
quote:
Actually, it would be your loss. Young people fresh out of university with an artsy degree are hardly a rare commodity, you can be replaced easily. Whereas, finding a good job for you is tough.
|
Arts grads who actually know a thing or two are rare.
And it's not a job after graduation I'm worried about. I already have had several offers.
I just need something in the interim so that I can finish up my school, and pay for the rest myself.
And my employer when I'm done wants me to work for her because of my credentials and my beliefs, so it's all good. 
quote:
All in all, it'd be your loss.
|

Someone who shows up to work on time, works hard, gets stuff done, and doesn't show up drunk on the job, or hung over the next morning?
It's their loss, not mine.
It's hard enough finding qualified people without conducting a litmus test.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|