 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
And PA once again shows his (un)glorious nihilism!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
Like how realistic it was to assume that we would never fly, go to the moon, or various other things?
PA is stuck with nihilism, more like.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
quote: et's see your train of logic here guys...
1) It was once thought impossible to do x
2) [b]x[/x] was then accomplished
3) Anything someone thinks is impossible, will therefore be accomplished!
Great work lads! Nice logic skills! |
Even God admits, man can do anything if he sets his heart to it....
However, with lack of unification, the heart conflicts; hence Babel.
So far, the general unity of the scientific community towards gaining knowledge is the primary reason for human advancement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
Yes, because current chemical or even nuclear reactions merely just rearrange the bonds around to gain energy. Inefficient.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000 time: 17:33
|
|
Hmm, scarcity can never really be eliminated. Whatever you have, you can always have more. If you own an entire country, you could want a whole world, how about a whole galaxy, the entire universe?
Although, that is scarcity based on egotism rather than any practical use or need. The real question is what happens when scarcity of basic needs is eliminated, that is:
An abundance of quality food and fresh water.
A fair allocation of land and living quarters rather than trading it as a commodity.
(inter)Net Access.
Although it is interesting to note that the Market economy is not leading towards such abundance, for example fresh water is becoming less abundant and more expensive, often as a direct result of the market economy, for example the fertilizers, pesticides etc applied to land to make production more "economical" pollute the rivers and reduce abundance of fresh water. Heavy industry and often agriculture pollutes the water table.
I also see, all around me, evidence of the Market Economy reducing (or atleast, not heading towards) abundance of food, my home region has been almost entirely paved over with vineyards, replacing land that use to be producing food, with something more profitable, wine to sell to the rich.
Now I'm not saying that the Market Economy will never evolve into a system where there is no scarcity of basic nessecities (anywhere in the world), but it's going to take longer than in an ideal system. Like when the technology finally arrives to filter slurry into pure drinking water, it'll probably be in the hands of some souless corporation that wants to make lots of money from it for as long as they can - and for a currentely "moral" reason, profits for the shareholders.
Altough it seems almost inevitable that even if nothing changes with the market (like the type of money used) then eventually some "opensource" group will invent, reverse engineer or steal a self-replicating nano-replicator device and in weeks there could be one in every house in the world and almost overnight the old market would wither away. Ofcourse it's impossible to predict how long it would take for such a farfetched solution to the worlds problems to come about.... there are less farfetched solutions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
quote: Humans : correct in making the leap from wealth as currency to wealth as
energy. But logic failure : wealth ultimately is extension of desire, fluctuating
with emotions and state of mind. Desires : when all are supported in purely adaptable
system, true wealth is achieved. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Viceroy
|
 |
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000 time: 05:33
|
|
I can see no way in which a star trek economy could occur without
1) more energy than we could consume
2) more "USABLE" space than we could fill
3) a cure for obesity that didn't involve excercise 
1 is certainly the case, but we do not have the technology to harness it yet.
2 is not the case, unless we consider other planets, or technology to create more USABLE space .. ie under water, space, other planet etc ..
3 from the looks of my junk inbox, this was solved years ago ha ha ha .. but seriously though, human health will in my opinion be a major problem if we did have more energy and space than we could use.
The way I look at it is, image a civ map with no bounds, and all the land gave as much resource and food as you fancied .. the game would change dramatically ! (be well boring wouldn't it ???)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|