 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
[Outside observation]
I cannot understand why Kerry get's so much flak for dissing the Vietnam war.
All those in favour of pointless aggression and war... vote Republican!
[/Outside observation]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
Perhaps in France you know all the political figures in your government, but here a citizen of CA could care less about an Mass Senator. Probobly didn't even know he was in politics untill be became national a year ago. I. E. no need to point put the failings of a non entity.
And did the fighter pilot or swifties pay for these adds? They simply told the right people the stories, and of course it would the anti-Kerry team, and someone sponsored them. |
Well indeed. There are people who have a bias against Kerry (just like the vets on the other side have a bias for Kerry), and they can be useful in the political campaign. Hence the political campaign uses them. That there are ads, that such financial and mediatic means are used, is a campaign move.
quote: If this confounds you, well you are a communist so open politics would. |
Thanks for the stupid BAM, which I find highly insulting. Besides, unless you experienced running for office yourself, I think I know more about open politics than you.
quote: And Kerry revolved his own campaign around his military record, which is FALSE. Talk about party idenfication, you are the poster child. |
Were I an American, I'd probably vote Nader. I don't see where you see me supporting Kerry. I just attacked a statement of yours that I considered to be idiotic and blind. I would have attacked Sava just the same if he pretended F911 wasn't a campaign trick (granted, with probably nicer words)
I admit I consider Kerry to be the lesser of two evils, but that certainly doesn't mean I'm believing him on his military record. I don't remember having defended Kerry's record or "consistency", and for a reason: I couldn't care less. However, it is true that I attacked the rabid behaviour of the Republicans who'd swallow everything that came from their side.
quote: Thats a good one Spiffor, that claim from Kerry doesn't even warrent the dignity of a respose. Kerry himself has bent over backwards to erase the memory of his claims of "war criminals" from the public eye. NOBODY, except maybe disgruntled Apolytoner's (which the best indication of nobody in the real world) considisders Vietnam Vets war criminals. Classic Spiffor, Classic. |
Rationalizations, rationalizations...
Since the American crimes in Vietnam disgusted a whole generation of Americans, and put an end to all out American wars for about 25 years, I would be surprised that everybody in your country has now forgotten or disregarded them. Kerry's allegations of war crimes may be less PC now than then, but I would really be surprised if all Vietnam vets are now considered to be heroes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
Unfortunetly for your logic, Democrats presided over the Vietnam war, and the Republicans got us out. |
Yes, but the current Democrat candidate has a track record of being opposed to pointless violence.
Unlike the Republican contender...
I'm guessing that Americans don't care too much for individual track records over party track records... or maybe that's a bit too simplistic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Yes, so what?
One contender stood up and was counted as against the war.
The other stuck his head in the sand and did not serve in any capacity except feathering his own nest.
No contest. One of them has a set of testicles, the other has a calculator and portfolio where his soul should be.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Yes, but I don't see a contradiction here.
Being in favour of invading Iraq and changing your mind about Vietnam after serving there... what's the problem?
I think I'll leave it there. The more I get told about this election the less I understand it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Patroklos
|
 |
Back home in good ole Norfolk VA
Dec 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
I have said that I respect Kerry for going to war to fight and perhaps die to defend his ideals.
That having been said a man is the sum of his entire life, he can make up for wrongs and he can compound them. And some just damn him. Writing false citations is not unique to him, but it is a hit. Coming back from the war and saying those outragious, false, and well stupid things is unforgivable. ESPECSIALLY if you try and use your status as self declared "war criminal" as a bonus later in life. Sorry Cruddy, Kerry's net war veteran worth is in the negatives all considered.
Bush, well, I don't give him any points for his national guard service. Not because I have anything against the NG, but because I admit that it was shaddy. But it isn't like he ran to Canada and then talked **** behind our backs like some other president we know. Nor did any of Bush's wartime actions hurt America or give him traitor stauts. Kerry will never live down his shame, at least to military voters and their families, which is a significant voting power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ogie Oglethorpe
|
 |
Marietta, GA
Dec 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
What a pathetic ad. Ohhh, you felt bad about protesters-well, why the **** should I care?
The thing is, this ad much better exemplifies the reason for this campaign- men stuck in 1971 reliving their nightmares, but more importantly, thinking that their sacrifice somehow had to be lauded by the people. It didn't.
I generally do feel sad for these guys-thinking that the validation for their sufferings had to come from strangers and outsiders. Why? The people owed them respect, but thats it They did not owe them anything else. To think people should not have stated the truth as they saw it becuase men were being held prisoners of war is absurd beyond belief- it is a perversion of democracy, which is the ability to change policy even in the worse of times-perhaps specially there.
John Kerry did the right thing by speaking out against a war he saw as damaging to the US. Too bad these men thought wrongly he owed them anything more than respect. Hopefully they can get over their hangup some day, because if they don;t, they will die embittered men. |
If anyone has a gripe it is the POW's (Which makes McCain's friendship with Kerry all teh more puzzling). Like it or not it is not public apporval the POWS were craving, but freedom. Given the thought process that in the military "We leave no man behind" the acts he engaged were designed to exit the war ASAP and be damned with the POW's. Thus a direct betrayal of the POWs. (I heard you argue that Nixon had no strategy, but buy 71 it surely had become) Nixons strategy was an exit with honor one which meant he needed to get the North Vietnamese to the bargaining table which they were unwilling to do in light of their impression of the US homefront. Acts such as Kerry's IMO undermined that effort and therefor casued needless death and suffering. If you recall correctly, the biggest bone of contention in the talks was release of the POW's as the North Vietnamese had branded them war criminals not POWS.
If you don't think that bears holding a grudge for 33 years your sorely mistaken.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
I have said that I respect Kerry for going to war to fight and perhaps die to defend his ideals.
That having been said a man is the sum of his entire life, he can make up for wrongs and he can compound them. And some just damn him. Writing false citations is not unique to him, but it is a hit. Coming back from the war and saying those outragious, false, and well stupid things is unforgivable. ESPECSIALLY if you try and use your status as self declared "war criminal" as a bonus later in life. Sorry Cruddy, Kerry's net war veteran worth is in the negatives all considered.
|
But... he fought as hard as he could AGAINST the war as he did for it.
Doesn't that show some moral character?
Yes, US troops were hurt, tortured and killed in the Hanoi H.
But... that was policy. War was never declared, and so "standards" did not have to be maintained.
Put it another way - would you have rather he did nothing? That the war was allowed to continue because nobody actually cared?
It may smack of treachery when a soldier says "this war is wrong" - but from my angle, it was THE RIGHT THING TO DO...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
No, it isn't, because people have to pay to see it, as opposed to having it hoisted upon them like and ad. And so the democrats had Moore come to their convention- wow, what a shocker, an anti-Bush celeb! Why, how dare the democracts do that! I mean, I am sure the repugs will have NO celebrities at their convention!!!  |
Please, Gepap, you're better than that. You know very well F911 is a publicity stunt that directly profited Kerry. It was an internationally broadcasted, hugely successful negative campaigning against Bush.
And it did blatantly benefit Kerry. That was part of the campaign against Bush, and there's a reason Moore is closer and closer with the Dems, while being further and further from Nader.
quote: Comparing ads from one 527 to another, that is sensible. Comparing them to F9/11? Thats just whinning that the right's sad attampts at documentaries and so forth have failed to gain any public acknowledgement. |
No it's not.
Ming used an "independent" campaign tool he was sure I'd know. And he was right using that example.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|