 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
in the other thread:
quote: it's disgustingly ugly. |
refers directly to the imac. i've established that i hate imacs.
quote: and i was amused that you had to bump your other thread because nobody really gave that big of a **** about it. |
word count: 1.
pointing out that you're a one-trick pony. nothing really about macs.
quote: btw, how the **** is it "fully expandable"? |
word count: 2.
pointing out that your initial claim about imacs, which i have established i hate, is wrong.
quote: 1. he misspells sayonara.
2. he still hasn't answered how the heck this new imac is "fully expandable".
3. putting someone who disagrees with you, however vehemently, i think is a rather cowardly act. especially since until this point i've never actually insulted him, just his inane fanboi support of apple. |
1 and 3, i admit, are somewhat personal attacks. i'm sorry you feel that way.
2 is still the same: your initial claim was wrong about imacs, which i've established i hate.
quote: because those are the people who are least capable of understanding what makes good technology good, and are blinded by style points. |
only a half-sarcastic remark. however, the market and the image does bear this observation out. hipsters like apple. hipsters also tend to be the ones running to it specialists-like me-to fix things that they messed up without realizing it because they don't understand machines.
quote: of course, to mac fanbois, nothing apple does can ever be wrong. |
personal attack on you, perhaps. it's true though. you've never really said much positive about microsoft until this thread, and seem to believe that apple can do no wrong. that's a classic example of fanboism.
quote: this is not "fully expandable". the term "fully expandable" includes the ability to add features, which does not appear to be in line for this imac either. |
reiterating the allegation that your initial claim was wrong.
quote: this is merely relaying what is an apple claim. which means that it is close to hogwash, also. not because apple is filled with liars, no i don't mean anything like that. i mean that the "most user-servicable" line is bullshit, seeing as x86 has been like that almost ever since its inception.
try again. |
emphasizing that point.
====
now, this:
quote: Ok, I read your posts in that thread. I found lots of foul language and nothing to indicate this "different" point-of-view that you've pointed out to me. |
lots of foul language? that's two words. you can bet there are people with fouler language than i.
also, how is anything there inconsistent witht he worldview that i've pointed out before?
note that all of my attacks are on apple's imac or the image that they try to sell--i do not attack their g5 hardware for the powermac, i do not attack their os, i do not attack their useful contributions.
try again. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mr. Nice Guy
|
 |
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Q Cubed
lots of foul language? that's two words. you can bet there are people with fouler language than i.
also, how is anything there inconsistent witht he worldview that i've pointed out before? |
3 foul words. You missed one in that last post. And there is still a lot of other language in your posts that is not cussing, but still sounds very harsh. Now don't get me wrong, I know I'm guilty of this sometimes myself, but I also know that I do need to try harder not to do this.
Hate? Disagree is a better word. There is no need to get angry if you disagree with someone or if someone clearly has made a mistake about something. That's very childish.
quote: note that all of my attacks are on apple's imac or the image that they try to sell--i do not attack their g5 hardware for the powermac, i do not attack their os, i do not attack their useful contributions. |
Oh really. Well, I can't recall ever hearing you praise the G5, the PowerMac, Mac OS X and Apple's useful contributions either. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Oh really. Well, I can't recall ever hearing you praise the G5, the PowerMac, Mac OS X and Apple's useful contributions either. |
if the search function worked, you'd see the numerous threads where i say i love the powermac and want one.
unfortunately, you seem to think the imac is the best thing since sliced bread, and i think it's an abomination. what's worse for you is that you're wrong and can't see it. 
as far as mac osx, you'll see in a lot of those threads that i point out it's stylish, slick, and that i like it. i also point out that i don't need a lot of that, and prefer simpler OSes--hence, my preference for linux most of the time. go look at the recent gentoo thread, and ask asher about how i keep telling him gentoo is the only distro really worth looking at, even if it doesn't work for him.
i tell you again, ask anybody, and i guarantee that most of the time, they'll tell you that i don't hate Apple or Macs in general.
unless you're afraid of that too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
muxec
|
 |
Mingapulco
Jul 2002 time: 07:24
|
|
Apple= no compatability, bad hardware support, avful interface, no warez
Linux= average compatability, average hardware support, average interface, freeware
Win=Stability issues, price(specially for corporate use), security holes, fast patching.
Grows of linux sector is a result of the fact that software is economically public good. Soon MS will need to adjust to that, maybe even by using Special Semi-Public License for Win.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|