 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
I actually think that they added some players after Dungy left in that offseason. It wasn't the exact same team as Dungy left. The core was the same, but some of the role players (who really are what win championships) were different.
But, of course it ALWAYS happens that way. They always can the guy that brought them there before the team makes it big (such as Showalter with the Yankees). I've always thought that the team would have won with the old coach in those situations.
Because, as we see now, Gruden has brought in his guys and they really, really, really suck. Hell, even last year they were pretty bad.
Oh, and of course, when in Oakland, Gruden never led his team to the Superbowl, but Callahan did. Does that mean Callahan is the better coach?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
reismark
|
 |
Paragon of Virtue
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
You're forgetting something very important about Dungy, Imran. He's not an offensive mind. He never called the plays while he was in Tampa - the offensive coordinators did, and before Gruden came in, a new OC was a yearly occurrance. We would not have won the Super Bowl in 2002 even with that defense because with Dungy, the offense would not have held up its end. Without Gruden's scheming, we get crushed by the Eagles (again) and we're not talking about the monkey on the Eagles' back...
quote: Because, as we see now, Gruden has brought in his guys and they really, really, really suck. Hell, even last year they were pretty bad. |
Why were we bad last year? Keyshawn being an ass, and injuries. Brian Kelly, John Lynch, Shelton Quarles, Mike Alstott, Joe Jurevicius. And it's the same story this year, only this time we have arrogant holdouts to worry about as well. When we play a game next year when Garner, Galloway, Jurevicius, Pittman, Dudley (our pass-catching TE who we just lost for two months) and McCardell (or whoever replaces him) are all healthy and available, and we struggle then, THEN you can say we suck.
quote: Oh, and of course, when in Oakland, Gruden never led his team to the Superbowl, but Callahan did. Does that mean Callahan is the better coach? |
- I firmly believe if not for the Snow Bowl ruling, it would have been the Raiders and not the Patriots beating the Rams in the Super Bowl that year.
- Callahan had essentially the same core in 2003 and he fell flat on his ass. Why? Because he was carried by players' career years the year before and he learned absolutely nothing from the well-deserved beating we put on him in the Super Bowl (translation: RUN THE GODDAMN BALL). Hence, there is no way you can make a case that Callahan's a better coach than Gruden.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: We would not have won the Super Bowl in 2002 even with that defense because with Dungy, the offense would not have held up its end. |
Um... like I've shown the offense wasn't that much better in 2002 than in 2001, and the offense in 2000 was better than in 2002.
quote: Why were we bad last year? Keyshawn being an ass, and injuries. Brian Kelly, John Lynch, Shelton Quarles, Mike Alstott, Joe Jurevicius. And it's the same story this year, only this time we have arrogant holdouts to worry about as well. When we play a game next year when Garner, Galloway, Jurevicius, Pittman, Dudley (our pass-catching TE who we just lost for two months) and McCardell (or whoever replaces him) are all healthy and available, and we struggle then, THEN you can say we suck. |
Other teams don't have injuries? It's a fact of life in football and you have to deal with them. The good teams get by with injuries. Sorry, but if sooo many people get injured under Gruden's watch, maybe it's because he doesn't train them well enough so that they avoid injuries. Some coaches have lower level of injuries because their training conditions the players better.
And holdouts and suspending players for the year for no absolute reason is a problem of the management and falls squarely on Gruden who pushed out one of the best GMs in the league (ie, Rich McKay) for his power trips.
quote: I firmly believe if not for the Snow Bowl ruling, it would have been the Raiders and not the Patriots beating the Rams in the Super Bowl that year. |
I seriously doubt it. The Pats won because the Rams didn't seem to take them seriously (partly because they had really no stars on the team). A Raiders team that was star-laden would not have been dismissed.
quote: Hence, there is no way you can make a case that Callahan's a better coach than Gruden. |
That was kind of my point . Callahan is not better than Gruden for simply getting to the SuperBowl in Oakland while Gruden did not. And Gruden is not better than Dungy in winning the Superbowl where Dungy did not.
All things being equal, if I had a team, I'd take Dungy to lead it before I'd ask Gruden to do so.
Last edited by Imran Siddiqui on 01-10-2004 at 21:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|