 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
when dealing with the Western Allies, the Germans treated prisoners according to the convention, didn't attack the Red Cross, didn't use poison gas or exploding bullets... yet didn't grant the same honours to the Russians, not to mention the whole issue of the holocaust.
So why? Why did the Germans follow the Convention when dealing with the Brits and Americans when they so obviously didn't care about human rights in regards to other groups?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
GENEVA... my bad.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
my question is why would a State that clearly didn't care about human rights go out of its way to follow the geneva convention when dealing with the Brits and Americans, especially as they didn't follow the convention when dealing with the Russians? Was it to ensure their POW's own protection in Allied hands? But then the Japanese didn't give a damn about the convention and Jap prisoners in American hands weren't butchered.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Hitler was looking to get peace with the western powers at a possible later date
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
Well, it wasn't so much that the Nazis didn't care about "human rights" - they didn't, as you or I would understand or define them, but they did according to their definitions. That CERTAINLY doesn't justify anything they did - let's be crystal clear about that. It does, I think, give some perspective on why they treated different groups differently.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
How did they deal with captured American soldiers who happened to be jewish? black? asian? hispanic?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
it's crazy how Spanish and Asians were integrated into the regular military (was there ever even a division to begin with?) while Blacks weren't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: It's not like American POWs were so well treated in Germany. Many of them looked like they'd been in the death camps when they were liberated, and many were also used for slave labor. |
In some cases, yes. In general, though, US (and Brit and Canadian) POWs (especially officers) were far better treated than other nationalities. Additionally, there is a difference between prisoners captured and held by the SS and those held in Luftstalags by the Luftwaffe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:23
|
|
chegitz:
almost every account i've read was positive... the pilot author of "Tumult in the Skies", whose name i forget as i read the book 6 years ago, noted how he was allowed to be freed of his handcuffs and wander about the town as long as he swore on his honour that he would return to his captors later in the day. he refused but still saw plays and movies with his guards. he was a major or colonel in the air force though, so that would explain his good treatment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: it's crazy how Spanish and Asians were integrated into the regular military (was there ever even a division to begin with?) while Blacks weren't. |
Well, the Japanese were certainly segregated in WW2. The 442d RCT, which served primarily with 5th Army in Italy, was the most decorated unit of the war, and was made up entirely of soldiers of Japanese descent.
Had the war gone on longer - had the US needed more infantry, that is - I think that it's likely blacks would have been integrated in, especially once Truman took office. If, say, the war dragged on through 1946, the US would have been getting short on trained combat infantry (much of available US manpower was tied up in stateside support roles and industrial occupations, as well as the Navy and Army Air Corps).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
Speaking of US POWs, there are some remarkable stories of US and British POWs liberated by the Soviets, who went to great pains to protect German (and Polish) civilians and even soldiers from the Soviet army.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
That's exactly my point, chegitz. There was a marked difference in the treatment of Slavs and Jews vs. Americans/Brits, and part of the reason for that had to do with the way the Nazis defined humanity and human rights.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
Well, the crews of bombers were seen as terrorists, essentially. Bomber crews were defined and treated differently - and, while I'm sympathetic to the US/Brit bomber crews, orders to carpet bomb and firebomb cities are orders that should be refused.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:23
|
|
While it is true that Western POWS were better treated than the Russians, it should be remembered that hundreds of thousands of western POWs worked as slave laborers.
Jewish POWS, and those who "looked" like jews or had Jewish sounding names were sent to concentration camps.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|