 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:22
|
|
"But officials decided yesterday that they would most likely have to declare that they had been misled about the records' origin after Mr. Rather and a top network executive, Betsy West, met in Texas with a man who was said to have helped the news division obtain the memos, a former Guard officer named Bill Burkett.
Mr. Rather interviewed Mr. Burkett on camera this weekend, and several people close to the reporting process said his answers to Mr. Rather's questions led officials to conclude that their initial confidence that the memos had come from Mr. Killian's own files was not warranted. These people indicated that Mr. Burkett had previously led the producer of the piece, Mary Mapes, to have the utmost confidence in the material.
It was unclear last night if Mr. Burkett had told Mr. Rather that he had been misled about the documents' provenance or that he had been the one who did the misleading.
In an e-mail message yesterday, Mr. Burkett declined to answer any questions about the documents.
Yesterday, Emily J. Will, a document specialist who inspected the records for CBS News and said last week that she had raised concerns about their authenticity with CBS News producers, confirmed a report in Newsweek that a producer had told her that the source of the documents said they had been obtained anonymously and through the mail.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/p...print&position=
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
It turns out that CBS was still trying to autheticate the documents on the morning of the broadcast. The reason they stopped, apparently, was that they showed the documents to the White House press secretary, and he did not challenge them. To CBS, this was confirmation of the validity of the documents.
This, to anyone outside the situation, seems to be an obvious mistake. If the documents were fake (as they indeed turned out to be), how would the White House be aware of their existence, in order to have an opinion on the matter. More importantly, failure to disclaim does not mean confirmation.
Why they made this mistake will be hotly debated. Conservatives, I'm sure, will claim that it is because the liberal media is out to get Bush. A more accurate portrayal looks into the mechanism of how the media opertes, and realizing that scoops and controversey mean ratings, and that such a gem as they had needed to be persued quickly in order to avoid being scooped.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|