 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:22
|
|
Gepap - quote: Why wouldn't it? If the state is soverign, some individual private landowner's stubborness does not stop projects for the public (state) benefit being moved forward. |
The state is not sovereign or we wouldn't have a Constitution limiting what it can do. We have a system of diffused democracy where federal, state, and local governments share sovereignty with each of us. The only way to make this work is to limit democracy... That limit is exceeded here...
quote: It is a power the government needs, and I think the constitution does allow for it. |
Every reference to "public good" within the context of eminent domain powers makes it clear "public" means government structures built on land bought from the rightful owner - structures that serve the public, not various factions within society...
Kid - quote: How could city govts ever make improvements without eminent domain? |
Buy land? Plan ahead? Tell the damn baseball team to build it's own stadium... I can't believe some of you guys think this is okay, it's no surprise eminent domain is being used more and more to transfer property from the less wealthy to the more wealthy...
at liberals
quote: It's the only way to create jobs? Fresno is making a huge industrial park here. Sure a few home owners complain, but with double digit unemployment no one else really cares. Most of the home owners who complain live alone in 4 bedroom houses. |
Opinion polls of people who are taking other people's homes don't impress me. Government doesn't create jobs, government is less efficient than the private sector so the more government takes from the private sector the more efficiency declines.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: The land owner is compensated fairly and a lot of people are made better off. |
Except the property owner, who might feel better off keeping his/her property. But then again, when the majority wants to take something, then might pretty much makes right, doesn't it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
Yes, everyone needs a job. Need doesn't create entitlement, though. I need $10000 to pay off student loans. Doesn't mean anyone owes it to me, though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: No. What makes it right is that the property owner is compensated. |
Value is not an absolute figure. What is worth $1 to you may be worth $1000 to me. What's more important, though, is the issue of ownership.
quote: Much like libertarian political theory, that doesn't work. |
*cough cough*
Pot, kettle, black.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: If I truely need something, and you don't then I do have a right to it. |
How do you figure that?
quote: Saying that makes just as much sense as what you are saying. It's just a biased subjective claim. |
No, it's based on an objective claim - that is, I'm morally entitled to my body, and by extension, what my body (myself) produces, and by further extension, what I acquire as a result of my production.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: If value isn't absolute than it isn't objective either. So you aren't helping your claim here. |
The relativity of value is irrelevant to the issue of ownership.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: How do you own things? |
If what you are getting at is "how do you conduct transactions", then obviously, two people agree on value.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|