 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Geronimo
I wonder how Canada's murder rate compares to the states along it's border. |
You do realize Michigan is a border state right??
Well if youwant to do and apples to apples comparison, you would have to segregate out the relatively large number of murders in the Canadan far north ( murder rate is by far the highest in the territories) from the "Canadian" total.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
Oh and I found this site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/region.htm
While the graphs are not precise enough to get a truly accurate reading, thee are some detailed stats.
New England region consistently has the lowest murder rates in the US at around 2.4 per hundred thousand followed by West-north -central US at 3.2. All other regions are over 4 .
So the lowest region in the US is still significantly higher than the average for all of Canada. (The lowest regions in Canada can often approach zero)
The good news is that the US homicide rate appears to be down markedly. ten years ago it was routinely around 9 per hundred thousand while in the last 5 years it has stabilized around 5.5.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:22
|
|
Toronto, pop 4 million, annual murders 90
Detroit, pop 950,000, annual murders 350
Enough said. Americans have a problem that they won't face up to.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
There is a correlation between liberal mayors and liberal judges who coddle the criminal element and crime rates -- at least in the US. |
There is a correlation between urbanity and liberalism, and there is a correlation between urbanity and crime. The correlation between liberalism and crime derives from that. It's not causal, as you suggest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:22
|
|
Republican mayors in New York who get tough on criminals = a sharp reduction in murder rates. It's not a coincidence.
Liberals need to support taking back their streets from the criminals (few Republicans live in these cities with warzones) and to disavow the prevailing uncaring attitude toward people who get murdered just because they're in dangerous criminal enterprises or buy from dangerous criminal enterprises. For instance, it's not OK when drug users get offed by their dealers because they haven't paid. NYC seems to understand this fact, after electing pansy democrats to mayor for a couple of decades.
Added to this should be greater information sharing among jurisdictions (these enterprises are linked) and greater involvement by the FBI in taking down these enterprises.
Last edited by DanS on 02-10-2004 at 00:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Republican mayors in New York who get tough on criminals = a sharp reduction in murder rates. It's not a coincidence.
|
It's got nothing to do with Repub vs Democrat.
Death penalty, Republican Texas has a murder rate of 6/100,000 compared to Ontario with less than 2/100,000.
And the effects of a repub mayor in New York is not that significant. Murder rates declined in the 90s throughout the US, regardless of demo or repub politicians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Republican mayors in New York who get tough on criminals = a sharp reduction in murder rates. It's not a coincidence.
|
Democratic mayors in most big cities = sharp reduction in murder rates. See my post above: it's not that liberals cause crime, it's that cities have high crime rates and cities tend to be run by liberals.
"Toughness" didn't cut the murder rates, broad societal changes did. Shrinking of the violent adolescent age group, better economy, reduction of the crack epidemic. There's no reason to believe otherwise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Chicago is more freedom-loving than Canada, though. Chicago shows compassion, and lets the murdered people vote.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
How is there any kind of local democracy in a place when the tilt reaches such a degree that only one party can ever win under any conceivable circumstances?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: How is there any kind of local democracy in a place when the tilt reaches such a degree that only one party can ever win under any conceivable circumstances? |
Easy. A party tilts to a regional bias and it gets stuck. Or "birds of a feather flock together," and large numbers of like-minded people move to certain places.
For example, the people of Louisiana have not once in their history elected a Republican Senator (since Reconstruction). The Democratic Party was very well aligned with LA in the 1800s and through the mid 20th century, but less now (although still close).
Or the rise of the rich whitey suburbs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Max Webster
|
|
My what an entertaining thread.
Well anyway the city where Muddy Waters was laying down his great music can't be too bad of a place.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|