Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Are the Conservatives doomed?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (4): [ 1   2   3   4   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 12:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Are the Conservatives doomed? Put an end to popups!

In a recent by-election for a previously Labor seat (the Tories came in second last time around) the Tories were utterly crushed and came in 4th behind the UK Independence Party. That's got to sting. Meanwhile the Lib Dems didn't even run for this seat (Hartlepool ) the last time around (I think) and they scored a very strong second.

How long is it going to take for the Tories to get a shot at power if, when Labor is hemorrhaging voters, the Tories don't seem to be able to pick up any of them and are actually doing worse than before

The Lib Dems are picking up some seats but it doesn't look like enough, the Tories are more pathetic by the day and the UKIP is pretty fringe (they don't have any House of Commons seats right?), looks like Labour will win again by default. You've got to hand it to Blair for staying on top (at least it looks like it at this point) despite the whole Iraq debacle.

Oh, anyone know the basics of the other minor parties? Like Respect, NF, Common Good etc. etc. I don't know anything about most of them except for the Monster Raving Loonies of course...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3705866.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3705928.stm

Last edited by Bosh on 01-10-2004 at 15:21

Berzerker is offline Berzerker
Emperor
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999
time: 23:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 12:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Labor is hemorrhaging voters


A result of Bush's failure to pass Kerry's "global test"

reds4ever is offline reds4ever
Prince
of the Spion Kop
Mar 2001
time: 05:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

IMHO the major problem that the Tories have is that so many voters in my 'demographic' remember what uncaring sh!ts they were in the 80's and will never vote for them in a General Election, no matter how bad Labour are percieved to be.

Starchild is offline Starchild
Emperor
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Also, it's been mentioned that we've forgotten how massively large Labour's majority is by historical standards. They could afford to lose a few seats and still have a majority in Parliament.

The death spasms of the Tories are fun to watch tho

lightblue is offline lightblue
Chieftain
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001
time: 05:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

I think the Lib Dems can become the 2nd party by the next elections, they seem to be making massive inroads, especially in the cities. The Tories have suffered massivel from a/ electing a Thatcherite like Howard as their leader and b/ supporting the war in Iraq.

Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Also is there any chance of the UKIP poaching the Tories' core votes and grabbing a few seats and really Conservative areas? They don't seem to be quite as bat **** crazy as the other right wing minor parties.

Starchild is offline Starchild
Emperor
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

*Ideally* the UKIP would tear all the social conservative, eldritch voters away from the Tories. UKIP could then wither away and the Tories could be reborn as a liberal, socially progressive party.

Ha. Like that will ever happen.

the_ceebs is offline the_ceebs
Settler

Jan 2003
time: 05:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Also is there any chance of the UKIP poaching the Tories' core votes and grabbing a few seats and really Conservative areas? They don't seem to be quite as bat **** crazy as the other right wing minor parties.


Well if you think living in a fantasy world that is stuck in the 1950's isn't quite as crazy. it dosent stop the delusional idiots from being mad. (They may take a couple of seats but not many)

quote:
I think the Lib Dems can become the 2nd party by the next elections, they seem to be making massive inroads, especially in the cities. The Tories have suffered massivel from a/ electing a Thatcherite like Howard as their leader and b/ supporting the war in Iraq.


The problem is that apart from in the south west, they are spread to evenly throughout the country. Labour are concentrated in the cities and the north. Tories in the countryside and the south west. so although the libdem's have increased their vote they need to increase it disproportionately to become the second party.

If the tories collapse again at the next general election, their may be a disintigration of an infighting party and this might lead to the lib dems becoming the second party

Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Starchild
*Ideally* the UKIP would tear all the social conservative, eldritch voters away from the Tories. UKIP could then wither away and the Tories could be reborn as a liberal, socially progressive party.

Ha. Like that will ever happen.

Well what's going the happen?

1. More of the same. Tories stagger on and don't get power.
2. Tories solidify the base and smack down challenges from the right like the UKIP and bide their time.
3. Move towards the already crowded fuzzy center.
4. Move towards Libertarian Lite and get a good number of people who don't have a real party now. Let the UKIP consolidate as a fringe and then eventually grow as the Lib Dems and Labour fight over the same votes.
5. The Lib Dems go back to obscurity and Labour keeps on having problems, letting the Tories rule by default.
6. Die.

I guess those are in rough order of likelyhood...

Drogue is offline Drogue
Emperor
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:43 Visit Drogue's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Are the Conservatives doomed? Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Boshko
Respect

George Galloway's party, a breakaway Labour MP. Very much against the war on Iraq, had deals with Saddam for large quantities of oil. Supported in some inner city areas, mostly by Muslims who's main issues is being against thw war. I'm sure EiF, were he here, would tell you about their corruption, but I'm not yet convinced.

quote:
Originally posted by Boshko
NF

Nazis. Like the BNP, but they don't claim to be peaceful.

quote:
Originally posted by Boshko
Common Good

No really sure. Some religious party, IIRC.

Drogue is offline Drogue
Emperor
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:22
  Old Post 01-10-2004 15:46 Visit Drogue's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

And F4J (Fathers for Justice) are a group that campaigns for father's rights in custody hearings. They like purple powder too

Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 08:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Where's Laz when you need him

Moral Hazard is offline Moral Hazard
King
of jack
Jul 1999
time: 01:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 08:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Blair is the man. Smooth talker, knows how to get things done. If the Tories had any sort of leader I think they might be able to push back. They need the Governator. Oh and Sky News should ratchet it up a bit.

Shi Huangdi is offline Shi Huangdi
Emperor
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999
time: 00:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 11:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

tont y blairu will win ibecause he is TEH PWNz0r

Sandman is offline Sandman
Prince
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 12:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
George Galloway's party, a breakaway Labour MP. Very much against the war on Iraq, had deals with Saddam for large quantities of oil. Supported in some inner city areas, mostly by Muslims who's main issues is being against thw war. I'm sure EiF, were he here, would tell you about their corruption, but I'm not yet convinced.


He's an odious git, but the charge that he had oil deals with Saddam was proven to be completely untrue.

Link

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 13:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

The tories were never, in a million years, going to do much in Hartlepool. However they need to worry about the fact that the UKIP is eating away crucial chunks of their vote.

If they swing to the right, they risk re-opening their internal splits over Europe, which will drag them back further and could split the party. Labour and the LibDems would gain from that.

Respect have some ground to gain in cities, but not the rural areas. It'll be at Labour's expense, and that'll boost the LibDems who aren't losing much to Galloway.

With the exception of the Iraq issue, Labour are pretty unified. Most of their problem is the direct attacks on the Blairs individually. My money is on Labour winning the general election with a majority of around 30-40 seats.

Drogue is offline Drogue
Emperor
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 15:38 Visit Drogue's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
Originally posted by Sandman
He's an odious git, but the charge that he had oil deals with Saddam was proven to be completely untrue.

Link

That proves he didn't accept money from Saddam, it doesn't prove he didn't pay Saddam for oil, which was shown when they uncovered Iraqi documentation, IIRC.

Drogue is offline Drogue
Emperor
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 15:43 Visit Drogue's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
Respect have some ground to gain in cities, but not the rural areas. It'll be at Labour's expense, and that'll boost the LibDems who aren't losing much to Galloway.

Are you sure on this? I'd have thought with Respect being to the left of the Lib Dems and with more vehemenant anti-war credentials they may pull votes from them. Or at least, the anti-war votes being lost by Labour would go to Respect rather than the Lib Dems. Without Respect, the Lib Dems would pick up more anti-war votes, IMHO.

quote:
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
With the exception of the Iraq issue, Labour are pretty unified. Most of their problem is the direct attacks on the Blairs individually. My money is on Labour winning the general election with a majority of around 30-40 seats.

Probably quite accurate. I can't see them losing the 3rd term, but they probably won't get much more than that. I'd love to see them not quite getting a majority and having to go to the Lib Dems to get the extra seats they need

Sandman is offline Sandman
Prince
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 16:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Drogue

That proves he didn't accept money from Saddam, it doesn't prove he didn't pay Saddam for oil, which was shown when they uncovered Iraqi documentation, IIRC.


It hasn't been shown, it's been alleged. One of the newspapers accusing him (the Christian Science Monitor) has admitted that the documents it used were almost certainly fake. Meanwhile, Galloway's libel case against the Telegraph is due to start in November, so we'll see if their claim has any credibility.

Provost Harrison is offline Provost Harrison
Emperor
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 16:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by reds4ever
IMHO the major problem that the Tories have is that so many voters in my 'demographic' remember what uncaring sh!ts they were in the 80's and will never vote for them in a General Election, no matter how bad Labour are percieved to be.


This is true. From my perspective, I think this disillusionment will mean a very low voter turnout at the next general election, but now I think that Labour will still win a third term in office. They may as well appoint Blair life-long dictator and have done with that - I said that years ago.

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 17:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Drogue

Are you sure on this? I'd have thought with Respect being to the left of the Lib Dems and with more vehemenant anti-war credentials they may pull votes from them. Or at least, the anti-war votes being lost by Labour would go to Respect rather than the Lib Dems. Without Respect, the Lib Dems would pick up more anti-war votes, IMHO.


The LibDems are anti-war, so I don't think that being pitched against a "more anti-war" party will hurt them much. Respect are a one-trick pony aimed squarely at Labour.

Take Hartlepool as an example. It wasn't Respect that strongly threatened a Labour safe seat- it was the Lib Dems. Even if not one wavering Labour voter switches to LibDem over war concerns and they all go to Respect instead, the LibDems will gain significantly by the Labour vote being split in marginal seats.

Provost Harrison is offline Provost Harrison
Emperor
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 17:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

And then there is the fact that, in reality, the Tories are just irrelevent. People haven't forgotten the Thatcherite reign, and they just bring nothing new and have nothing in common with the normal person in this country.

Drogue is offline Drogue
Emperor
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 17:40 Visit Drogue's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp


The LibDems are anti-war, so I don't think that being pitched against a "more anti-war" party will hurt them much. Respect are a one-trick pony aimed squarely at Labour.

Take Hartlepool as an example. It wasn't Respect that strongly threatened a Labour safe seat- it was the Lib Dems. Even if not one wavering Labour voter switches to LibDem over war concerns and they all go to Respect instead, the LibDems will gain significantly by the Labour vote being split in marginal seats.

True, but without Respect, the Lib Dems get all the anti-war votes. Having 2 anti-war parties splits the vote, even though they take more away from labour, so there's more votes to be split. Respect hurts Labour far more than the Lib Dems, but like Nader does in the US to the Democrats, it also takes votes that without Respect would probably go to the Lib Dems.

Zulu Elephant is offline Zulu Elephant
Prince

Jun 1999
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 18:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
True, but without Respect, the Lib Dems get all the anti-war votes. Having 2 anti-war parties splits the vote, even though they take more away from labour, so there's more votes to be split. Respect hurts Labour far more than the Lib Dems, but like Nader does in the US to the Democrats, it also takes votes that without Respect would probably go to the Lib Dems.


I dont think Respect is really hurting anyone at the moment. They've gained votes in areas with large Muslim populations but remember that Muslims are concentrated in certain (often very pro-Labour) constituencies and not, generally) in middle class marginals that Labour took from the Tories in 1997.

Respect is very much a Socialist Workers Party type organisation and many of their votes are coming from the oldschool 80s style socialists who, lets face it, wouldn't be voting New Labour anyway.

The only party taking Labour votes in any number are the Lib Dems (The Tories haven't moved the polls for months - The loss in Labour points is going to the Lib Dems)

When it comes to the crunch, a lot (although certainly not all) voters will switch back to Labour from the Lib Dems come a general election, if only to stop a Conservative winning in the constituency they're voting in. The people switching to the Lib Dems are centre-left, intelligent types, not fundamentalist, who are smart enough to realise that a not-so-perfect Labour government is preferable to the Conservatives - Labour hasn't pissed them off that much, especially since the new manifesto is looking like its going to contain a nice bunch of social democratic policies.

Dauphin is offline Dauphin
Emperor
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Where I live there are lots of people who vote LibDem and say "I want to vote right of centre, but I look at the Tories and think, God no! They're evil, slimy people" . The Tory majority over LibDems was 269 in 2001, will be interesting next general election which way it goes.

Zulu Elephant is offline Zulu Elephant
Prince

Jun 1999
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by Dauphin
Where I live there are lots of people who vote LibDem and say "I want to vote right of centre, but I look at the Tories and think, God no! They're evil, slimy people" . The Tory majority over LibDems was 269 in 2001, will be interesting next general election which way it goes.


The Lib Dems will certainly pick up a lot of seats from the Tories at the next election, but they won't become the main opposition in the next 20 years.

The way the seats and votters are distributed benefits Labour most, then the Tories and the Lib Dems least. A percentage draw between Labour and the Conservatives at the next general election would still leave Labour with a majority somewhere between workable and thumping (not my phrase). With this in mind, it would take a swing of unimaginable proportions to put the Liberals anywhere near second place (in terms of number of MPs), let alone power.

*End Is Forever* is offline *End Is Forever*
Emperor
Salford, UK
Jan 1970
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:20 Visit *End Is Forever*'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Good god, where to start on this thread...

Zulu Elephant is offline Zulu Elephant
Prince

Jun 1999
time: 05:22
  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

He's going to claim the English-Scottish Act of settlement is some kind of socialist conspiricy to stop the Conservatives getting in and that there are millions of Tories unwilling to admit to voting Conservative who will come out of the woodwork at the next general election (As Major said before 1997)

*End Is Forever* is offline *End Is Forever*
Emperor
Salford, UK
Jan 1970
time: 05:22
Arrow  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:32 Visit *End Is Forever*'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Let's start with Laz, seeing as he was injecting reason to an extent rather than letting his colours show.

quote:
The tories were never, in a million years, going to do much in Hartlepool. However they need to worry about the fact that the UKIP is eating away crucial chunks of their vote.


First sentence, agreed. Second, not.

I think the collapse in the Conservative vote was towards the Liberal Democrats on a "get Labour out" ticket; each Conservative pledge in Hartlepool, I assume, as with Leicester South and Brent East, would have got about four pieces of paper through their door in the 24 hours prior to polling telling them that "the Conservatives can't win here". It's superb campaigning but it tells us nothing about what might happen in a General Election where they have neither the resources nor the credibility to pull off such a message.

I think the UKIP vote came largely from Labour voters. People forget that a nationalistic, anti-EU, anti-immigrant stance actually plays well in areas considered to be strongly Labour (don't see the BNP making gains in well-to-do areas!).

quote:
If they swing to the right, they risk re-opening their internal splits over Europe, which will drag them back further and could split the party. Labour and the LibDems would gain from that.


Agreed entirely. This is the potential disaster with this result - the fact the Conservatives came fourth will, ultimately, be fairly irrelevent.

quote:
Respect have some ground to gain in cities, but not the rural areas. It'll be at Labour's expense, and that'll boost the LibDems who aren't losing much to Galloway.


RESPECT are a dead-loss in the country. In the cities, their gains are very much at the expense of Labour - often benefitting the Liberal Democrats but not always - look for a strong Tory campaign in Bethnal Green & Bow come 2005.

*End Is Forever* is offline *End Is Forever*
Emperor
Salford, UK
Jan 1970
time: 05:22
Arrow  Old Post 02-10-2004 21:35 Visit *End Is Forever*'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Boshko,

quote:
How long is it going to take for the Tories to get a shot at power if, when Labor is hemorrhaging voters, the Tories don't seem to be able to pick up any of them and are actually doing worse than before


The Conservative Party was never going to win Hartlepool. The voters Labour lost in Hartlepool were core Labour voters - they'll never vote Conservative, but they will consider (in a by-election at least) the Liberal Democrats and (to an extent) UKIP.

Yes, Hartlepool is a bad result for the Tories, but in the greater scheme of things it's about as relevent for us as Labour losing their deposits in the Christchurch and Romsey by-elections was for them.

 
Pages (4): [ 1   2   3   4   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22.
Apolyton Time is 00:22.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0687 seconds (90.44% PHP - 9.56% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net