 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: That is an infringement on the freedom of association of both employer and employee. If I don't want to join the union and I can't work as a result, the union is deciding if I can work, not me and the employer. |
Eh? Union shop agreements are freely agreed upon between the employees and the management, not dictated by the state. How, exactly, are they an "infringement on the freedom of association?"
Last edited by Ramo on 15-10-2004 at 10:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Union shop agreements are freely agreed upon between the employees and the management, not dictated by the state. |
That's a mischaracterization of reality, when you also face the fact that employers aren't allowed - in yours and Che's fantasy and unfortunately in some realities - to crush unions, by closing stores, firing employees for starting unions, etc. There IS government interference, otherwise why in the hell would most companies agree to the presence of unions?
If the contract between unions and employers aren't directly coerced by the government, the fact that the employer has to tolerate the presence of a union IS in many cases coerced by the government.
In any case, I have no problems with the existence of unions, as long as there are no laws preventing employers from banning unions, or firing employees for unionizing, or closing stores that bring in unions. That way, EVERYONE's freedom is protected - employees are free to organize, and employers are free to pick and choose who to hire and fire. Can't get much more fair than that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
That's odd, I'm not in a union, and I'm doing fine. Interestingly enough, I get by through my own hard work and merit, rather than relying on government rules and regulations and bullshit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Ever hear of strikes? |
Ever hear of, as you call them, scabs? Ever hear of unemployment? Because I guarantee you, when there is unemployment, workers who go on strike CAN be replaced.
quote: Yes, the poor widdle employers are being coerced into these agreements by the state, when the state prohibits employees from creating closed shops - and union shops as well in right to work states, conducting jurisdictional strikes, secondary boycotts, and the state can slap down an injunction on them whenever they get antsy and decide to strike. |
What's your point? Regardless of state laws about unions, I only support the existence of unions in the absence of laws prevented employers from acting - non violently - against unions.
che,
quote: So bevcause it's true for you, it must be true for everyone. |
Not necessarily, no, but hard work and a strong work ethic will take you a lot farther, in general, than a union will.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
che,
Not necessarily, no, but hard work and a strong work ethic will take you a lot farther, in general, than a union will. |
Nyet. The reason this country has a halfway decent standard of living for most people is because of unions. Unions gave us a minimum wage, social security, health care, and a lot of other nice stuff that countries which don't have legal unions don't have. Unions may be down today (which is why so many of the rights we won are under attack), but without unions, we'd all be a lot worse off today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
Minimum wages lead in part to unemployment, and artificially interfere with the free market.
Social Security is not sustainable, and quite frankly, there's no good reason I should be forced to save in a government account for my own retirement when I could get a better return privately. The only way around that is to either say that the government should be my nanny and force me to save, or that I'm not actually putting money away for my own retirement, but rather paying for that of others (which is part of the reason SS is currently unsustainable). As for socialized health care, I've said before and will continue to say that the US private health care system is near the top in terms of GP care, and AT the top in terms of surgery, teaching, R&D, and specialized medicine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|