 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
Doesn't the whole theory of deficit spending your way out of a recession rest upon the notion of it being temporary? Last time I checked reducing the deficit isn't the same thing as eliminating it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Kontiki, I hate to go through this once again, but there does seem to be a strong correlation between budgets moving from deficit to surplus and the onset of recession. (Deficits add to demand. Surplusses subtract from it.) All this suggests is that budgets have a strong effect on the so-called business cycle, and that one should plan on a modest deficit and never plan on a surplus -- at least in the absence of significant inflation. |
You can go through it as many times as you want, Ned. It's not going to make it right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
Ned, the Canadian government just racked up its seventh straight surplus. By your logic, we must be in one of the longest, deepest recessions the world has ever seen.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|