 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
bfg900-
I'd like to hear your answer to my original post.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
quote: Originally posted by bfg9000
It is a recurring theme in history that weak countries get exploited by stronger ones. It's immoral, it's not right, but it is a fact. It's just human nature for that to happen. If I'm an African-American looking at it from that perspective, I have to thank God my ancestors were snatched from Africa and brought to America. |
That's like being thankful you only lost an arm and a leg in an accident instead of an arm and two legs. Certainly it is an incrediably selfish and inanely limited view of the world.
If that's your take on it, then it is just like saying Jews should be thankful for the holocaust because they got Isreal out of it.
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by bfg9000
That is probably true. If it weren't for slavery African-Americans would not exist. America would not exist in way we know it - we might still be an English colony. Are you just taking issue with the somantics of my argument or are you suggesting that blacks should view themselves only as Americans (because they could only have decended from a combination of slaves in America) and that they only need to be concerned about viewing slavery as a civil rights infringment on their American citizenship and not as former Africans escaping cutural domination by Europeans?
If you want to argue somantics, my premise is written incorrectly. But the same idea still applies. If you are an African-American concerned about the advancement of the African race, you must look objectively at colonial American enslavement of Africans as a positive thing because it paved the way for African assimilation into a European-based culture that had the power to conquer and destroy Africa if it had chose to.
I understand that it is difficult for blacks to be objective about this because they still have to deal with racism and subjugation by whites. For blacks, accepting this idea is almost like accepting the status of being a second-class citizen that has been forced on them by whites for so long. That is NOT what I am trying to suggest here. |
I guess my argument is with your semantics. Otherwise, I agree that slavery has had some unintended positive effects to go along with the negative.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:20
|
|
I've said for years that blacks in the US are, by and large, far better off than blacks in Africa, and as a result reparations are bullshit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Feel free to give them your money Sava.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
Saying they should be thankful is like saying you should be thankful if a rich person kills your family and then adopts you. Yes, if they had left you to fend for yourself you'd be worse off, and if they hadn't done anything you might still be "worse" off (financially), but that hardly means you should be thankful for what they did.
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JimmyCracksCorn
|
|
Macedonia - Sovereign country north of Greece.
Dec 2002 time: 05:20
|
|
Saying African Americans should be greatful for slavery is absolutely retarded.
You have to wonder if any of the problems Africa is facing today would still be a reality if the slavers had never come. For example, the slave trade completely disrupted whole regions of Africa as they saw the most productive members of their community taken away. In traditional societies, such as they were, social stability can sometimes hang on a very delicate thread, and when you disrupt it so drastically and so suddenly, there's no way for that society to cope or go back to stability.
Also many parts of Africa were genetically raped. You know the stereotype of blacks in the US being bigger and taller and stronger than white people? There's a reason for that. The slavers didn't want puny guys as slaves, so they only took the biggest, strongest, fastest and smartest Africans as slaves... which meant that alot of Africa's most valuable individuals were gone. There's alot of literature out there on the effects this has had, and most of it is quite well founded.
Another thing is, you can't be so blind to think that European slaving and colonization hasn't drastically, drastically altered the course that Africa has taken in the past 500 years. Prior to the Euros going there, Africa was a realtively stable place, especially compared to Europe. If Euros hadn't gone there, there's a VERY good chance Africa wouldn't be in the trouble its in today.
African Americans and African instablity are two chips off the same block, you wouldn't have one without the other. They weren't spared anything.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|